ipl-logo

Who Will Save Behavior Sibling Analysis

566 Words3 Pages

Ethics means respecting all life in general. The cartoon, “Mascots” does the right action through the virtuous ethic and also shows a role reversal in racism, the blog “Who Will Save the Savior Sibling” does the right action through the virtuous ethic by attempting to defend Savior siblings nationwide because they can not defend themselves, and the excerpt from “Lather and Nothing Else” does the right action through the virtuous ethic. To begin, it is virtuously correct to treat everyone with the same dignity and respect. Phil Hands uses his cartoon Mascots to persuade people of caucasian descent that someone’s ethnic background should not be used as a symbol for something with no relation to said ethnicity, because no matter how hard you try, it will always be offensive. Hands persuades caucasian people to be more sensitive with his cartoon about the controversy of the Native American culture being used as images to advertise a product, or …show more content…

Maura Dickey is persuading all parents of ill children in her non-fiction article, “Who Will Save the Savior Sibling?”, that savior siblings do not have a voice due to their parents speaking for them because the pursuit of materialistic things has turned them greedy and can rapidly spiral out of control. Children should not be treated as if they are disposable and only needed for parts. Everyone deserves a choice with what is happening to their body and Maura further expands on this by saying “This leaves the savior siblings who don’t want to provide a live-organ donation helpless”(4). This is crucial when realizing that everyone has a right to choose. Dickey’s thought process is ethical because if this is simply overlooked it has the potential to release carnage on the building blocks that we as a society have clawed and fought to

Open Document