The women were considered weak, they stayed as the offense. The men were known as the “Brave Knights,” however they played defender and offender. Women their roles were the more on the side for you know, that one boy on the wrestling team that can't even attempt getting the other opponent on the floor, the ‘weakling’ type of work. Being complex and always on the strict side clothing wise Victorian Era, women and men roles were to me very complex. Men on the other hand were the big hand of things. They were the ones on the wrestling team that were boosted up to a higher grade to compete against. That's how I see they took stuff and how they were so on the point that women were weak and it’s like they thought they wasn't really meant to do things men did which they did. They had a fashion role to! They were really strict on what to wear kinda made me think of amish in a way. The “strict part was only 1901-1910.” Women had tight corsets and pastel that were a really good look for the women most of the time during the Victorian Era. The men, however, had quite a different style than nowadays. Men had fashionable …show more content…
They tried to make everything perfect even tho even tho no one or anything can be perfect even if you are a billionaire it wouldn't be if it was life would not be life it would be like an easy puzzle that takes one try and you get it together. Nothing would be fun. You will never have challenges to go against and try hard to complete. There was some crime, but every thing i have read was just saying that it was not too bad it seemed, but i would say there at some point something worse, like what happened to the author of Earnest just because he was gay, I don't see anything wrong with it,but they had some strict laws and they really made sure to throw someone in jail because of the way they just