ipl-logo

Why Did Gallipoli Lose Ww1

1506 Words7 Pages

In early 1915 World War I had come to a standstill. One of the causes of the Gallipoli campaign was to attempt to break the stalemate on the Western Front. The Western Front was lacking productivity with no progress being made by either side. The British Government soon realised that an attack would be more useful somewhere else. On November 24th 1914, Winston Churchill suggested to the War Council that they should create a new front to fight on. The plan was to create another front, the Gallipoli Peninsula,other than the Western Front, in which they would fight, forcing the Germans to split their army to cover the new front and support the Austrian Army. This plan meant that the German army would be spread thin across Europe so that they would …show more content…

The Gallipoli campaign was initially intended to have a direct naval route to Russia, have new areas to attack the central powers and therefore spreading the German army across Europe, by seizing the Dardanelles Strait. All of this also meant that it was planned that it would shorten the war for the allies to have a success. This however was not the case. Because the allies failed in seizing the Dardanelles Strait, it meant that they could not re-arm Russia. It also meant that they were unable to knock Turkey out of the war. If Russia were to be re-armed it would have meant that they could defend themselves and the allies would have more defense and forces that could be used to fight against the Central Powers. The Gallipoli campaign made no progress in the war, there were only …show more content…

From the Gallipoli Campaign, 2779 New Zealanders died, and 4852 were wounded. The whole country felt the significance of losing 2779 men, not just the friends and families of those men. The Gallipoli campaign made no progress in the War, nothing was achieved but lives were lost as a costly failure. This is significant as the New Zealand soldiers fought hard and were committed to fighting in this battle. Their determination to stay fighting was admirable, even though they knew the campaign was failing, as the allied troops were up against 14 Ottoman divisions, whereas there were only 13 allied divisions. The loss of lives were significant as it was such a large number of New Zealand men who lost their lives in such a fruitless battle. The original war records stated that there were 8556 New Zealand soldiers that landed on the Gallipoli Peninsula. From this figure there were 7447 men who were wounded or that died. This meant that the casualty rate for the Gallipoli Campaign for New Zealand mean was 87%. This figure was significant as it was such a large number of the New Zealand soldiers that had casualties. The original casualty rate was also far higher than any other country’s. This high casualty rate was significant as it was such a huge percentage of casualties compared to other countries and it showed that the New Zealand men were

Show More
Related
1257 Words | 6 Pages

The Battle of Hamel had a huge positive impact on the young nation as Australian was renowned for its leadership and the war tactics. Source D (page 2) is a quote from the French President Georges Clemenceau. This is a very important source as it is a quote from a president of an entire nation acknowledging Australian men. Historical quotes like this would have really encouraged the Australian troops and the strong sense of a great

Read More
602 Words | 3 Pages

It was recorded that around 600+ Australian soldiers had died on the battlefield, and 1600+ were wounded. The

Read More
987 Words | 4 Pages

There were many casualties on the Western Front, conditions were challenging, and Australia was involved in multiple battles. Lives were lost on the Western Front because of bombardment and sickness. On the Western Front, lots of blood was spilt and sickness was common. People may say that Gallipoli was more important than the

Read More
185 Words | 1 Pages

They saw their friends, brothers, and men they worked with, die. World War one was split in many small wars. One of the battle that the Australians helped to fight was the battle of Fromelles. The battle of Fromelles was considered one of the worst battles in history. It only went on for 12th hours, but yet the 5th Australian Division

Read More
742 Words | 3 Pages

They were hard at work all through the night, but, the Turkish forces launched waves of fierce counterattacks to get them off the country. Both sides suffered a great loss in men, however, the ANZAC lines held. At least 2300 ANZAC soldiers passed away that day and night. This was a major challenge for the troops as they did not have enough forces to attack together. There were weeks of counterattacks and loss of thousands of men each day.

Read More
1015 Words | 5 Pages

This source says that our campaign was like the American civil war . We were both young countries introduced to the horrors of advanced of modern warfare, but unlike the civil war, it was not the Turks attacking us, in fact it was us Australians going to a foreign country that we had no strife

Read More
1149 Words | 5 Pages

The losses of lives and ships had dented the plan but the Allies pushed on. The inland conditions were horrific. The Allied troops had to break through roots of trees which had created barriers. Narrow roads obstructed the troops from traveling quickly through the land. The German troops had all been moved towards southern England as they had been informed that that is where the invasion was going to commence.

Read More
857 Words | 4 Pages

During World War One, there was a battle, which, while not as well known as Gallipoli, which finished only 6 months prior, is certainly just as significant to Australians both past and present. The battle of Fromelles saw thousands of soldiers die in less that one day, and although being regarded as a complete and utter failure, has taught Australians the importance of individuals. It has also taught people that war is not fun and games, the way it is romanticized in film and television, but is truly, indescribably inhumane and murderous. Good or bad, the battle of Fromelles cannot be called anything less than significant. The battle of Fromelles is often regarded as the most severe and overtly pointless battle that Australians fought throughout World War One.

Read More
830 Words | 4 Pages

Casualties in the war mainly favored in the Australians side with the Japanese casualties greatly outweighing the Australians. NMA (National Museum of Australia)

Read More
510 Words | 3 Pages

The Gallipoli campaign, also known as Dardanelles Campaign, was established April 1915 due to the outbreak of World War 1, which forced men from all nations to enlist in this event that demonstrated honour toward their nation. The controversy erupted on the 28th of June 1914 as Archduke Franz Ferdinand and his wife was assassinated. In view of the fact, a global conflict was emerging; the entire world became associated with the generating actions of militarism, alliances, imperialism and nationalism. The Gallipoli campaign was a vital part of the Australian and New Zealand history, as it was the first major event they had encountered.

Read More
635 Words | 3 Pages

Every single soldier in the war came close to death, whether watching a fellow fighter die, almost dying themselves, or killing an innocent victim. Anywhere from 620,000-850,000

Read More
1075 Words | 5 Pages

125000 of well trained and equipped members of BEF (British Expeditionary Force) helped to resist the assault. A crucial element of failure of the Schlieffen Plan was the fact, that Russia organised it 's army earlier than Germany suspected, what forced it to send soldiers away to Western Front and fight off the Russian troops invasion. Another reason for the

Read More
171 Words | 1 Pages

The Gallipoli Campaign was a campaign of World War 1, which was initiated by Winston Churchill in the hope that the Allied forces could gain control of the Gallipoli Peninsula. With control of the Dardanelles, the Allied forces would be able to reach Constantinople and be able to transport supplies to Russia, a British Empire ally (P.K.Macdougali, 2004). This campaign, although an important campaign in shaping Australian history, was considered a military failure. The reasons as to why it was such a catastrophe was due to the inadequate maps and the initial planning, which led to failures at the Landing and at the Battle of the Nek. The biggest reason as to why it was a failure was mostly due to miscalculations.

Read More
992 Words | 4 Pages

Despite the fact that it appears harsh to through the blame on just the Navy it was the matter that the Naval boats sent by Britain affirmed that they could start to begin sending troops on the coast of Turkish region, which then ended up being one of the greatest oversights made. This resulted that neither the British Troops nor the ANZACs could make strides. Individuals were outraged and extremely disappointed bringing about Hamilton's substitution by Monro who ordered Birdwood to arrange for an evacuation. The battle ended and on the nineteenth to the twentieth of December, troops at ANZAC cove and Suvla Bay were withdrawn, trailed by Helles in January. The Turks were misdirected with self-firing guns however it is believed that they knew of the evacuation and let it continue to protect livs of anymore danger that could have arisen.

Read More
1686 Words | 7 Pages

While on the other hand the Allied Forces had powerful allies such as the USA which could contribute greater resources of men and materials. Furthermore, the British had put in place a Naval Blockade prevent the passing of cargo of any ships that attempted to pass through, this was very effective and starved much of Germany’s population. Lastly, Germany’s two front with Russia greatly weakened German forces and had larger repercussions later on. Although these are all important causes, the most factor that

Read More

More about Why Did Gallipoli Lose Ww1

Related Topics

Open Document