ipl-logo

Why Did Joseph Stalin Come To Power

881 Words4 Pages

What source one is trying to interpret is what Russia had to go through to get to a classless, Socialist society. First Lenin was in power and wanted to soften the ideas of communism because he believed that socialism had to be changed in order to fit the political, economic and social situations in Russia. So, he made the New economic system which had some capitalist ideas; it gave peasants farmland to own, and they were allowed to decide what to produce. Many didn’t like the idea of capitalism; they wanted a government that would fix all their economic problems fast. So when Lenin died Stalin beat Trotsky and came into power. Stalin wanted absolute control. Which lead to many of his policies and development meaning oppression and fear instead …show more content…

He saw that total collectivization meant taking everything away from peasants. The reason he was helping Stalin and the Soviet Union gain power is because he believed that he was achieving and helping the “necessary transformation” of the farm side. The necessary transformation started in 1932-33, Stalin’s plan was to take independently owned farmlands form wealthy farm owners (Kulak) and give it to the collective. He wanted industrialization, more agriculture and government ownership of land. This lead to collectivization policies, which were designed to put an end to Ukrainian nationalism. Some of these policies were large grain quotas given to farmers that had to be made. If they weren’t meant, farmers would either be killed or they were sent to the gulag. Millions died from starvation. Some were satisfied with these changes because they were given land but most were unhappy. Those who were unhappy destroyed their crops and equipment and killed their animals instead of giving it to the government, which led to a major famine. Stalin saw the famine as a success because if anyone opposed the new policies were killed or sent to the gulag which resulting in everyone seeing that the collective farm was there to stay. This famine represents a rejection of liberalism because it was used as a weapon to try and get rid of Ukrainian nationalism, this is a violation against the civil rights and liberties of the

Show More
Related
774 Words | 4 Pages

From 1928, when the plan started, to 1932 to its end, many factories, dams, power stations and even cities were being built. Despite there being harsh penalties implemented to workers for failure to meet their targets, there was still a significant increase in Russia’s industrial growth in a very short period of time. Just like the emancipation of the serfs in 1861, under Tsar Alexander II, in protest of Stalin’s policies, the peasants, in protest, refused to work harder than they needed too, causing them to destroy livestock and crops, which eventually lead to their unnecessary death. Stalin, just like the Tsarist autocratic regime, was not committed to collectivism but preferred capitalism in his ruling of the Soviet Union. This caused a lot of rebellion from the Kulaks who opposed collectivism.

Read More
784 Words | 4 Pages

Stalin was indeed good for the USSR, because he improved the economy by using collectivization farms, which led to an increase in quality of life. Although he did good for the country, he wanted prosperity and recognition more than anything, so he was willing to sacrifice his own citizens’ lives. Stalin was good for the USSR, because he changed the USSR’s economy positively by using sets of goals, called the “Five Year Plan”. The objective of this was to multiply production in manufacturing, like coal, oil, pig iron, and steel.

Read More
896 Words | 4 Pages

3: Dr. Oleh W. Gerus, “The Great Ukrainian Famine-Genocide,” Centre for Ukrainian Canadian Studies, University of Manitoba, August 4, 2001 (adapted)) Stalin’s policies had stripped Ukrainians of their hard-working, individualistic values, turning the country into a voiceless machine used to make more grain to be

Read More
1331 Words | 6 Pages

Litvin illustrated one of the numerous examples of Soviet nationalism when he discussed how the military collected food from the collective farms. Litvin Claims, “Times were very difficult for the people in these regions because land had been devastated by war… the army did not have to seize food from the peasants—Soviet authority engaged in this.” The above passage paints the Soviets’ handling of peasants in a positive light and does nothing to ponder the impact that collectivization had on agriculture in the country. Certainly, the harsh occupation by the Germans did not help the agriculture production, but the relentless collectivization of farming ruined the efficiency of agriculture in the Soviet Union. However, Litvin in no way paints Stalin in a negative light, but rather boasts about how Soviet authorities procured agriculture goods from peasants.

Read More
413 Words | 2 Pages

From 1929-1930, Ukrainian farmers fought against the program and stayed individual, these farmers were known as "kurkuls". Stalin decided to "liquidate them as a class" and introduced a policy of class warfare. The new policies from the "dekulakization", ended up with half a million Ukrainians being deported to remote areas like Siberia and are left to die. In 1932-1933, the Soviet government increased Ukraine’s production quotas, just so they could not be met.

Read More
476 Words | 2 Pages

Stalin Primary ambition was to turn what he believed to be the industrial backwater that was the Soviet Union into an economic a world superpower. His goal was to make up decades or even years of time in just a single decade. By the definition of his goal he succeed he had turned a mostly agricultural country into an industrial super power, but it did not come without a cost. Those cost fell on the soviet working class in two ways the first was their atrocious living conditions and the second was their personal freedoms.

Read More
1357 Words | 6 Pages

He said the problem was "bourgeois nationalism". Fifthteen Ukrainian villages were arrested by the Soviets. The Soviets clearly had the upper hand over the people. Stalin deported mostly successful farmers, which helped him increase in grain. Successful farmers, or kulkuls are branded as the class enemy, and brutal enforcement by regular troops and secret police is used to "liquidate them as a class”(Babij 1).

Read More
990 Words | 4 Pages

Under the breadths of communism, Stalin reorganized the economy and changed labor prioritization. Executing a total of 3 individual 5-year plan installments, Stalin began to change the long ancient farmland based economy into an industrial superpower. These centralized economic plans were instated by a state planning committee that followed communistic economic principles. In this manner, the 5-year plans called for rapid industrialization through heavy industry. Joshua R. Keefe wrote for the Student Pulse: “ . . .

Read More
266 Words | 2 Pages

Stalin wanted the eastern part of Europe to be a communist nation. The reasons where more for his benefit then anyone else's. There where three major goals for Stalin in having communist nations. One of his big goals that he was trying to receive was he wanted workers from all over Eastern Europe to revolt up. This was kind of like take overs.

Read More
227 Words | 1 Pages

Joseph Stalin gained absolute power in 1928 after overcoming struggles with rivalry communist members after the death of the previous Soviet leader Vladimir Lenin. Stalin had come up with five year plans to help transform the Soviet Union from a peasant society into an industrial superpower. The main idea of his plan was forced collectivization of Soviet agriculture, where the government took complete ownership of the farms. Of course, this was not done peacefully, where farmers where shot immediately when refused to cooperate. The forced collectivization resulted in a extensive famine throughout the soviet union, that killed millions of people.

Read More
1319 Words | 6 Pages

Fordham University entailed, "if there were a proletarian dictatorship not only in our country but in other, more advanced countries as well, Germany and France, say. If that were the case, the capitalist encirclement could not be so serious a danger as it is now, " With these three quotes excerpted thus far, it is clear to see that Stalin played the victim card, making the Soviet Union seemed completely doomed. To fix this awful problem, the answer lied in the rapid industrialization he desperately wanted and eventually achieved (Fordham University). Stalin also explained on the Soviet Unions issues internally. Fordham University stated, "But besides the external conditions, there are also internal conditions which dictate a fast rate of development of our industry as the main foundation of our entire national economy.

Read More
459 Words | 2 Pages

Stalin used this insignificant position as his base to build off of. Before anybody realized this, everyone already owed their position to them. After the leader of Bolshevik died, Stalin took total control. Stalin soon became a person people feared because he had many arrested. Stalin changed peasants back to serfs and millions died of labor and starvation.

Read More
516 Words | 3 Pages

Before Stalin become an ally to the U.S. and U.K., he was an ally to Nazi Germany. Stalin sought to achieve only what he felt was in his best interest. Stalin wen so far as to break promises that he made at the conference of Yalta to organize free elections, and inserted a puppet government. Stalin believed that the communist political, social, and economic ideology was what he could spread throughout the world. Just as President Wilson wished to spread democracy far and wide, Stalin desired to spread communism far and wide.

Read More
793 Words | 4 Pages

Totalitarianism is a form of government in which the national government takes control of all aspects of both the public and private life. It’s the purpose of getting rid of the battle between government and society with the keys traits of totalitarianism. Even though there were many ways that joseph stalin was a totalitarian dictator, the key traits of totalitarianism were ways for joseph stalin to be a totalitarian dictator, but firstly he used methods of enforcement to make people follow under their rules, then he used propaganda to promote himself as a good leader, and lastly he controlled all aspects of society. The first part of the key traits for Stalin would be how Joseph Stalin used methods of enforcement to make people follow under their rule. In a quote from the document packet, “People lived in fear of their co-workers, those above them, those beneath them, and those on the same level.

Read More
1428 Words | 6 Pages

Until the late 1930’s and Stalin’s ruthless policies, it was not a developed industrial state. With the USSR having been born from the backwards monarchy in place before, it would take a strong central leader to lead the country to progress (SOURCE). This line of thinking is a large part of Stalin’s reasoning to continue his amount of power within the state from the moment he was instilled. His reasoning also followed that in order to fulfill Marx’s underlying theme of the eventual states communist society, a state must be centrally strong in order to defend against enemies before the state is safe to relinquish its power over time and eventually “wither

Read More

More about Why Did Joseph Stalin Come To Power

Related Topics

Open Document