It is also noted how BP took many risks before the accident occurred, which could have prevented the disaster from occurring in the first place. Before the disaster BP had sent in a lighter sea water fluid down the pipe, instead of a more common heavy drilling fluid, for cost cutting measures and the company knew it was riskier to use this option (Anonymous 2010, 8). This is something that we see that is all too common in most man-made disasters, and is something that is questioned by the general public, on why they would take such a risk in the first place. BP knew it was riskier to use this method and decided that is was better to use this uncommon method, instead of the much more proven, and most commonly used by most oil rigs methods for …show more content…
The real answer to this question is oil and our dependency on it for our daily lives. Oil is used in almost everything we use, sometimes on a daily basis. It is used to run our cars, and transportation centers, and it is used in everyday products. Oil is a precious commodity that has impacted man-kind for the last century and seems to grow each and every year. One of the main problems that has come up in recent years, is finding it and digging for it. Most of the oil has already been found, captured, and used already, and this is only the oil we found on land. There are still large amounts of oil untapped that lie in our ocean waters. This new expedition to get this oil has been a gold mine to many countries and oil companies. In fact, according to David Bond (2016), the deep seabed is ideal for large oil fields (36). This type of information shows how our dependence on oil and to search for new and untapped oil fields led to this disaster happening in the first place. Humanity has almost conquered all the oil fields on the planet, and the race was on to find more of it before the other person gets to it first. Where this oil is on earth, has led to deeper and deeper drilling to reach this untapped gold mine, and with the new technology that has been created over the past several years, we are now able to reach this oil, an dig for it, when it was not possible just a few …show more content…
Elliott (2015). Mentions how Bon Secor a local fisherman and his fishing business is struggling, because of a lack of oyster production and he blames this due to the oil spill. This type of reaction by Mr. Secor and the information given, shows how the oil spill has affected the community and many local businesses that are dependent on the ocean for their income. People like Mr. Secor, entire business relies on the ocean, and if it gets damaged or something changes, it can and will severely damage his business. There are many people like this person who probably still struggling or have lost their business entirely due to the oil spill and is something that could have been avoided if the company had taken the proper precautions to prevent the disaster from happening in the first place. This is also one of the news stories that normally wouldn’t get attention from the mainstream media and often either his story gets untold or gets lost in the shuffle of telling the general audience the impact the oil is having on the surrounding area. While shortly after the oil spill happened, tourists stopped coming to the area, they were slowly returning. According to Elliott (2015), tourists were coming back to the area, thanks mainly due to BP’s aggressive campaign ads. This type of information shows how a disaster can have an immediate impact and extremely hurt an area’s economic income, in this instance, that was the