ipl-logo

Why Did The North Started The Civil War

700 Words3 Pages

Do to the fact that the North and the South’s social, economic and political differences it started The Civil War. One of the biggest reason’s why America went to war was because of slavery. The North and The South had multiple social differences which caused conflict between the two parts of the nation. One reason was that the North was a huge manufacturing area that was highly advanced vs. the South being extremely un-advanced slave based system. After when New York exploded with merchandise much more people came for the good wages mostly immigrants coming to America, there were mainly two types of immigrants Irish and German, more than 3 million of immigrants coming in (Textbook 13.1 pg.400). When the North was inventing new machines …show more content…

The North benefited from transportation all though the South had little transportation the North benefited from it because it allowed more manufacturing. Transportation helped the North’s manufacturing allowing more income when the South barely benefited from it (text book). In the South slaves had harsh conditions but in the North they benefited from child labor. For example slaves would have to work 14-18 hours a day in harsh weather (SMA) were as the North the woman and children worked in dirty conditions. Also the North created a man made river to import and export goods this was the Erie Canal (James 2/25/16). The North had factories unlike the South, they had agriculture (text) which was based off of cotton. The North benefited goods from manufacturing, and from selling goods; were as the South benefited from the Cotton Gin and steamboats (James 2/25/16). To reinstate economic differences benefited political …show more content…

When the westward expansion was accuring huge debates caused politicians to argue about free and non free states. After Fredrick Duoglas proposed the Kansas-Nebraska Act in May of 1854, led to much violence because Douglas let people decide for either free or a non-free state instead of the people in just those states people from other states came to vote for slavery and non-slavery this led to much violence it caused the Kansas bleeding, this led to the Republicans having an upper hand (James 4/6/16). The North believed that slavery was outdated and wrong but were as the South being a slave based economy they saw nothing wrong of slavery. For example a Southern politician by the name Roger B. Taney stated that “Had for more than a century before been regarded as beings of an inferior order, and altogether unfit to associate with the white race, either in social or political relations: and so far inferior that they had no rights which the white man was bound to respect; and that the negro might justly and lawfully be reduced to slavery for his benefit” (CC#18). How the Republicans got a upper hand was because of the Kansas-Nebraska Act since there was so much violence just so Kansas and Nebraska can be slave states people saw this and wanted to support the Republicans because they didn’t want violence. The political differences that made the South and the North go to

Show More
Related
200 Words | 1 Pages

In the south there were slaves and in the north there were immigrants who worked. Document four says that the only thing northern soil favored was small farm stands rather than large plantations. This lead to the larger economy in the North. Document three shows us how the industries transported

Read More
203 Words | 1 Pages

It allowed the North to trade with the Midwest breadbasket, increasing economic opportunity and prosperity through the construction of railroads. Document H shows the railroad routes in the US in 1860. While the South had just a few railroad

Read More
490 Words | 2 Pages

The North had a far better economy than the south, with about twice as many soldiers, factories benefited the North’s economy rather than the South, increasing tensions between the two regions. Southerners relied on their plantations and slaves to work on them, so the fact that the Northerners wanted to take away their slaves just pushed the South to the edge. By 1860 the North had over twice the amount of railroads as the South; despite the fact that the South had a larger population due to slaves (Doc A). The mass amounts of railroads in the North upheld the large amounts of deliveries between factories. While the North was mostly industrial and the South was more agricultural.

Read More
331 Words | 2 Pages

1. I believe that the Market Revolution in Northeast improved the lives of Americans. Americans could now get more products by going to the market. People had gotten more for clothes for a cheaper price. Not only that

Read More
270 Words | 2 Pages

There were many differences between the North and the South. For instance, the South were very agricultural as opposed to the North which were industrial. The South used cheap labor in the form of slaves, whereas the North had workers do their jobs in factories at a faster pace. Because of sectionalism, competition between the north and the south began to increase.

Read More
906 Words | 4 Pages

The north was living a more relaxed and healthy society compared to the south. The southern states were not doing pleasant socially. The south was filled with slaves which means no right, no choices, no freedom, and that means the slaves didn't have any social life especially compared to the north. The northern states had a free life because they were free people, they had free lives, and all their hard work was labor not slavery so it paid off. In the north people had the option of going to school and college was an option but you had to have been wealthy.

Read More
533 Words | 3 Pages

Document 2 illustrate the graph of the population, soldiers, number of factories, and the miles of railroad tracks. The population, number of soldiers, number of factories, and miles of railroad tracks was greater in the North than the South. The South was angry and intimidated of the North. In conclusion, the Civil War originated from numerous reasons such as the North abolishing slavery, South seceded from the Union, and the powers of the North .The South was furious of the North.

Read More
489 Words | 2 Pages

The North had many advantages. They beat the South in population they could draw soldiers from. The North had 22 million citizens where the South only had 5.5 million citizens. The North could transport supplies and people faster because of their roads, canals, and railroads. However the South disconnected from itself with barely any railroads and hard to move soldiers and goods from place to place.

Read More
1265 Words | 6 Pages

The residents of the North desired a more powerful and centralized government with more government control and bigger banks. On the contrary, the people of the south wanted a weaker federal government and wanted more power given to the states. The reason these differences existed were due to the different industries that the North and South focused on. The South was heavily focused on farming and produce to sustain their economy. This meant that they required cheap manual labor.

Read More
1125 Words | 5 Pages

In the beginning, the North had many advantages. On paper, the North was clearly more established than the South. There were twice as many states in the Union than there were in the Confederacy. This gave the North an advantage in voting power, support, job opportunity, and production. The North also had a major economic advantage.

Read More
477 Words | 2 Pages

The south had year round warm weather and good soil while the north had harsh winters and rocky terrain. This lead to the trade of food from the south and manufactured goods the north could produce (Economic). However, the north could not support itself without trade, be it from the south or from the overseas, making it a very important part of the

Read More
180 Words | 1 Pages

North and South had economic, political and cultural differences. South economy was connected to cotton as vital staple. Cotton was very profitable and many slaves were needed to work on plantations. People that didn’t have enough money to invest on property move North for job opportunities. After the War of 1812 industrialization in the North expanded tremendously.

Read More
524 Words | 3 Pages

The north has Bad farmland therefore they didn't have great agriculture. South has great farmland which meant they had a very good economy for agriculture and cash crops and much more. Secound was there various differences in the economy of the North and South. In the North for economy their was immigrants,textiles,cotton, and

Read More
1262 Words | 6 Pages

Economic: The southern economy was good because the British helped with the demand of cotton. Social: The North was happy because over $830 million went to the war effort and they benefitted greatly. Summary: The transportation of people and goods were changed by the invention of the steamboat and the railroad.

Read More
269 Words | 2 Pages

The North would benefit indirectly from slavery because the cotton used to produce their textiles would be from the South. However, the North did not depend on slavery because they had other resources to help flourish their

Read More

More about Why Did The North Started The Civil War

Open Document