ipl-logo

Why Does Polus Jump Into The Discussion

822 Words4 Pages

Amylyn Ja. De Paz Introduction to Ethics (PHI-240-830CH) Homework for Monday, January 30, 2023 Why does Polus jump into the discussion at this point? (461bc) Polus jumps into the discussion after Socrates has managed to get Gorgias to contradict himself. He does this since he believes that Socrates was unjust towards Gorgias and as a way to express his opinion after listening to Gorgias and Socrates discuss. What attitude does Polus have towards Socrates and the discussion itself? Polus has a defensive, stubborn, unrestrained, wrathful attitude towards Socrates and the discussion itself. This can be portrayed when Polus states ”This man!” (467B). This exclamation was said after Socrates had bested him in the discussion and the tone Polus used can be inferred to be fueled by …show more content…

He then states that politics are for the soul and consist of legislation and justice. For the body, there are gymnastics and medicine. These four values are what flattery tries to adopt and disguise itself as: tries to seem as beneficial and as important as these values. Cookery does the same by trying to present itself as medicine. Food can taste better than medicine but it is not of the best interest of the body. Food seeks to pleasure over best needs, and Socrates states that rhetoric does the same; there is no rationality to rhetoric. Socrates thinks that rhetoric is an imposter that presents itself as the hero of the story only to show its true colors at the end of the story (my analogy). Socrates dives further into this by stating that “beautification is to gymnastics,'' “sophistry to law-making” and “rhetoric is to justice.” All of these values—beautification, sophistry, and rhetoric—are embellishments and frauds of the beneficial ideals. Socrates believes that rhetoricians and sophists are the same. Socrates attests that rhetoric does the same to the soul as cookery does to the

Show More
Related
510 Words | 3 Pages

Grant Pendergraft Mrs. Erwin English II 20 January 2023 Jay Heinrichs is Very Good at Arguing Thank You for Arguing, by Jay Heinrichs, but more specifically, his section Remember Aristotle’s definition of virtue: A matter of character, concerned with choice, lying in a mean, is a persuasive essay on implementing rhetoric back into the curriculums of schools. He believes that if the population was taught rhetoric, the community would change for the better. He believes that when rhetoric is introduced into society, we will be less susceptible to tricks that currently fool us. This includes everything from candy bar ads, to American politics.

Read More
679 Words | 3 Pages

Luis Arredondo Professor Kinkead Composition I 11 September 2016 Aristotle Summary Aristotle Rhetoric Book I takes a look into the social implications of rhetoric, while describing attributes of rhetoric. Aristotle clarifies the difference between dialectic and rhetoric, dialect having overall implications of the message and rhetoric having particular set of goals. The main goal of Rhetoric is to persuade the audience on a large scale. Ethos, logos, and pathos are necessary for persuading the audience due to ethos establishing credibility for the speaker, logos giving the speech a logical approach, pathos giving the audience an emotional perspective.

Read More
190 Words | 1 Pages

(460 b). In which, Gorgias agrees. And Socrates asks Gorgias again, “now isn’t an orator necessary just, and doesn’t a just man necessarily

Read More
1220 Words | 5 Pages

Throughout the debate, Socrates seizes his knowledge of rhetoric and uses it against Gorgias. His understanding of rhetorical appeals and devices allows him to conspire a plan to trap Gorgias in his own contradictions. Through the use of Ethos, Logos, and Pathos, Socrates adequately

Read More
1506 Words | 7 Pages

Plato’s dialogues Gorgias and Phaedrus both consider the idea of rhetoric. Rhetoric being the art or skill of getting something from the masses or individuals, and often used in getting away with a crime. The type of rhetoric being argued about in the Gorgias dialogue is public rhetoric, what exactly rhetoric is, whether it is an art or not, and how it is best used so as to promote the highest good. In the Phaedrus dialogue private rhetoric is being discussed over the issue of love. This paper will examine how eros is central to both the Gorgias and Phaedrus dialogues.

Read More
2334 Words | 10 Pages

The following statement by Gorgias, for instance, is maintained throughout the dialogue: "The rhetorician is capable of speaking against everyone else and on any subject you please in such a way that he can win over vast multitudes to anything, in a word, that he may desire." Plato, p. 16 Socrates addresses this in the discussion with Polus about happiness and proves again the injustice of rhetoricians. The men conclude together that the happiest man is without vice, "the greatest of evils," Plato p. 45, and the "…second happiest… is he who gets rid of it… And he… is the man who is rebuked and admonished and brought to justice."

Read More
713 Words | 3 Pages

I do agree with Socrates that rhetoric is mostly misused and dangerous for both the speaker and the listener. I believe rhetoric is dangerous for the speaker because that person maybe don’t understand how much power they hold over someone. It can be dangerous for the listener for the simply fact is the information they’ve been give may or may not be correct. I think past experience motivated Socrates feel this way about the usage of rhetoric. One example that Socrates proves that rhetoric is being misused is his example of the physician and I agree because this happens now in the world.

Read More
1090 Words | 5 Pages

Callicles believes that the naturally strong can do at they wish because they are able to get away with it (484a-b). Socrates refutes these claims by saying that the stronger are the mightier and the mightiest are the many (488c-d). Meaning that the stronger are the ones that make the laws so by nature the strongest are the ones that make convention (488e). Rhetoric has the lowest power, the flattery used in rhetoric is to persuade people, this persuasion only works if most people believe it to work. Without ignorant people a rhetorician would be

Read More
961 Words | 4 Pages

In the Apology Socrates defends himself against the charges brought against him by his prosecutor Meletus in two ways. In the first way Socrates describes his method and

Read More
560 Words | 3 Pages

Socrates claims that he did not consciously corrupt the youth of Athens, and he gives many reasons why he is not at fault for these actions. In his defense to the jury, he tells them that by looking at the facts, they will see Meletus is accusing him of something that is not true. The way Socrates defends himself is well-thought out and logical. He ask Meletus a serious of questions and Meletus answers, Socrates then moves on to the next question to support his claim.

Read More
912 Words | 4 Pages

Making enemies and becoming the topic of conversation, the Athenians began to view Socrates as a threat to their beliefs and way of life and sought to end it. In order to end this, Socrates was accused of blasphemy (Mod1SlideC7). Socrates’s accusers took him to court and after Socrates did not play their game by asking to be sent into exile, and in the end, he was sentenced to death. After reading the textbook and Plato’s writing influenced by Socrates, I realized that in the period of his life Socrates was indeed truly a threat to the Athens society, because he looked for answers that no one else bothered to find which challenged their culture.

Read More
1006 Words | 5 Pages

That is why Socrates believes that doing injustice is much worse than suffering it for it is more shameful and that person will be unhappy because of that shame. I think that anyone who is put in the place of Polus will reply the same, since nobody would want to feel the guilt and the shame of doing injustice. The act of committing injustice actions goes back to the root of

Read More
713 Words | 3 Pages

When Socrates calls on to Meletus in order for him to make his claims and explain them to the assembly and the jury, Socrates makes different arguments

Read More
904 Words | 4 Pages

A book by Mascelli, J. V. called The Five C’s of Cinematography reveals the filming techniques of a motion picture. It is one of the most significant and influential book on filmmaking ever printed and the Five C’s which are Camera angles, Continuity, Cutting, Close-ups and composition; helps readers understand why certain visual or technical choice would trump over others. A Research article called Attention and the Evolution of Hollywood Film by Cutting, J. E., Delong, J. E., & Nothelfer has also contributed to this thesis. The authors of this research article have investigated over 150 films with release dates from 1935 to 2005 to study in detail what grabs an audience’s attention from a psychological and scientific point of view.

Read More
1151 Words | 5 Pages

He told Socrates to answer this own question. This again shows that Polus has no confidence in his position of only doing what is good for oneself and does not want to be wrong even more,

Read More

More about Why Does Polus Jump Into The Discussion

Related Topics

Open Document