ipl-logo

Why Europeans Were Conquerors

1160 Words5 Pages

The Europeans who have long since been referred to as “explorers” were conquerors. Although conquering may not have been what the Europeans had in mind when they set off, they did take over new lands and people. They took lands that they did not own, and had no real right to take, essentially stealing them. They went as merchants, but decided to stay because they could make profits off the new land. Europeans wanted the glory of discovering and claiming a place not already claimed or known to the other European countries, not just for themselves, but for their country. Claiming and owning meant the most glory for the Europeans. They also thought that the Native peoples would be easy to convert to Christianity and would do as they were told. …show more content…

They went as merchants to make profits, but used the abundance of natural resources as reasons to stay. Europeans traveled for glory, and used lack of recognized ownership as reasons to claim the New Worlds as their own. They went as missionaries to convert the indigenous people. They used reasoning and force to convert them. They believed it would be easy to use and control the Natives. The Europeans spread disease and unwanted, unknown ideas to the Native people. Even well-known authors call them conquerors in their books. Louis B. Wright defended the explorers, but also called them conquerors multiple times. He stated that people who were not there could not really say whether the actions were wrong for that time. However, people of the 21st century realize that those actions were wrong. The Natives did not ask to be invaded and have new ideas forced onto them. They also did not ask to be killed or contract diseases. They did not ask for these things, but they did not have much of a choice. Not living at the time, we cannot prove or disprove whether the Europeans, at the core, really wanted to conquer the New Worlds, or whether that thought developed over time. Based off of John Locke’s and Thomas Hobbes’ theories , does that make the Europeans of the 15-17th century naturally evil? Does that make us naturally evil, since those are our ancestors? Or does that make us naturally good, since we have learned from their mistakes? Whether people then were good or evil, they were conquerors either

Show More
Related
612 Words | 3 Pages

Indigenous people had let the travelers inhabit their lands and they ended up turning their backs on them. They decided they liked being in charge instead of just being a normal visitor and they took over the lands and people. During these times, the world was suffering from pollution and people were losing the ability to

Read More
526 Words | 3 Pages

Within the 1800’s European Explorers forced their way through the insides of western and central Africa. Along the west coast of Africa, European nations traded for slaves, ivory, and gold. Africa was under full assault by the 1800s, as European nations competed with one another for control of the continent. Europe wanted to imperialism (take over) Africa and the forces (what they did) that helped them succeed is the new technology, Nationalism, and lastly the most important industrialism.     Europeans invented many different things in order to help them take control of Africa.

Read More
854 Words | 4 Pages

The Europeans conquered almost all of the land destroying empires and decimating populations, and destroying cultures. Once Columbus had arrived the natives barely clung on to survival. Because of the arrival of Columbus and this trade between

Read More
663 Words | 3 Pages

Christopher Columbus sailed to the New World in search of a new trade route to India. But instead he came to the New World, thinking he landed in India. Not knowing where he was, Columbus called the natives 'Indians’. Columbus began colonizing the New World for his country, Spain. He brought back precious metals, animals, and disease back and forth between continents.

Read More
562 Words | 3 Pages

The Native Americans embraced the Europeans’ arrival, offering every item they requested and trading everything they owned since they were not materialistic people like Columbus and his men were. Despite being treated by the natives as if they were one of their own, Columbus saw the outstretched generosity as a sign of weakness and a way for him to manipulate and conquer the oblivious hosts. While the European’s were given a charitable welcome, as Howard Zinn stated, Columbus’ aim was clear- he wanted slaves and gold, so he did not retaliate the warm welcome given to him by the Native Americans. Columbus’ voyage to what he believed to be the Indies, was a commercial expedition as he sought wealth and did anything necessary to obtain

Read More
715 Words | 3 Pages

Europeans exchanged letters to the royal throne, and claimed that by accumulating new territories it would further open the possibilities, and boundaries for Europe to expand their economy. This would also include bringing light to the indigenous cultures, and helping to maintain the balance of power in Europe, all in the name of God. This of course was a cover-up to allow them to fulfill their greed, and desire for status and wealth. The Europeans had an almost legitimate reason for being able to journey into the indigenous land.

Read More
1067 Words | 5 Pages

For starters, Christopher Columbus and all of his european pals sailed the ocean to try and find a faster way to india so they could trade more things and make more money and just being greedy in general. But, instead, he sailed right into the land that today is now known as North America, but back then it was called the new world because it was new, and he made contact with the indian’s living their. He and the

Read More
961 Words | 4 Pages

Yet, modern times never focus on what problems the Europeans caused in their process to discover new land. They killed people, used many people as slaves, and spreaded many diseases all in search of new land and wealth. They destroyed the peace that maintained before they arrived to the land they explored. They tore apart many civilizations in order to build their own on top of it. The Age of Exploration was a time of corruption.

Read More
1231 Words | 5 Pages

The end of the fifteenth century is attributed as the time period in which Christopher Colombus “discovered” the Americas. Although he was allegedly the first European to have reached these unknown lands at the time, many sought to reach the new world, for a variety of reasons. Most of those people could be divided in two: the settlers and the conquerors. In North America, there were more of the former, people looking for a new home where they could rebuild their families and lives. In Meso-America, however, the goal was to exploit the lands in order to produce and extract new goods which they could trade.

Read More
1079 Words | 5 Pages

Throughout the late 1400’s and the 1500’s, the world experienced many changes due to the discoveries of new lands and peoples that had been never been visited before. The new-found lands of the Americas and exploration of Africa by the Europeans led to new colonies and discoveries in both areas. It also brought different societies and cultures together that had never before communicated, causing conflict in many of these places. While the Europeans treated both the Native Americans and West Africans as inferior people, the early effects they had on the Native Americans were much worse. Beginning in the late 1400’s, many different European explorers started to look for new trade routes in the Eastern Hemisphere in order to gain economic and religious power.

Read More
654 Words | 3 Pages

The Europeans were able to conquer the Americas because even though it was by “accident,” they were still more prepared for what was to come. Jared Diamond calls the European “accidental conquerors.” Diamond calls his theory geographical luck and concludes that the only way the Europeans were able to dominate the Americas was because of the way the ocean patterns happened to flow. The geographical wind patterns caused the ships to sail towards the Incas and the Aztecs and when the Europeans arrived they tried to conquer the Aztecs and Incas, they succeed for a number of reasons. One reason that they were able to conquer the Americas was because of their technological advances.

Read More
721 Words | 3 Pages

The Europeans believed that it was their job to convert the indigenous peoples to Christianity. They decided that the way to do this was to force them

Read More
443 Words | 2 Pages

Some explorers, like Henry the Navigator, explored new lands because they believed that they were required to spread their religious beliefs to everyone that they could meet. They trusted that God would reward them for doing so. Religion was very important to most people and they were willing to leave their families to pursue it. By doing so, this changed their lives for the better because

Read More
797 Words | 4 Pages

Deconstruction was introduced by French philosopher Jacques Derrida. Later “deconstruction” develops to interrogate the assumptions of Western thought by reversing or displacing the "binary oppositions" that provide its foundation. (Shen, 2012) To deconstruct colonial discourse is not simple a process of expelling colonizers but more importantly reconstruct the cultural code that the colonial discourse imposed upon the colonized. (Georgetown University Library)Therefore to deconstruct colonial discourse involves breaking the binary oppositions built up by the colonizers.

Read More
1163 Words | 5 Pages

The Europeans showed an example of ethnocentrism by stating the belief that those inferior races should be conquered in order to make them civilized. Exploration led to imperialism since nations wanted to explore territories that were unknown to them. Nations explored territories to lay claim to them, and sometimes for research means. Claiming territories showed national strength and

Read More

More about Why Europeans Were Conquerors

Related Topics

Open Document