Why Foreign Language Matters Rhetorical Analysis

699 Words3 Pages

As United States citizens, we lack the motivation for preparedness and choose to wait until something happens in order to find a solution. Representative Rush Holt speaks out on the issues The United States has as a whole in the article, Why Foreign Language Matters, by using the three rhetorical devices, ethos, pathos, and logos. Holt can be given credibility because he directly quotes the words of one of our Presidents, Barack Obama, trying to persuade us on what we should be doing to become bilingual. The author uses pathos to grab the readers by the heart and toggle their emotions when he refers to the attack of 9/11. By stating factual evidence, the author uses logos when he discloses the amount of money raised for the National Security Education Program.
Using the rhetorical device ethos, in which the author is showing the reader that he is a credible source; Representative Rush Holt uses many means of this rhetorical device by mentioning our Presidents Barack Obama, George Bush Sr. and Paul Simon in his article. The author makes reference to Barack Obama, in using ethos, by stating his view on this issue and how we can better ourselves. “We should have every child speaking more than one language.” (Holt 1) Obama is persuading the government to enforce bilingual education at a young age. In addition, President Bush …show more content…

In doing so, it will not only be safer, but in turn be better for companies who trade and do business together. Holt touches upon 9/11 and the attacks to persuade the reader to teach their children at a young age to learn new languages. He also states facts and uses credible sources to try to convince the reader, language education plays a big role in our community and safety to well being. We will become a more experienced and cultured