In the op-ed piece “A Change of Heart about Animals”, Jeremy Rifkin emphasizes the similarities between humans and animals by providing results on scientific research studies to illustrate that humans should be more empathetic towards animals. In addition, he further explains how research results have changed the ways humans perceived animals and indicates solutions that were taken by other countries and organizations to help improve and protect animal rights. Rifkin provides examples that demonstrate animals have emotions, conceptual abilities, self awareness, and a sense of individualism just like humans. For example, Pigs crave for affection and get depressed easily when isolated, two birds Betty and Abel have tool making skills, Koko
Jeremy Rifkin, the president of the Foundation on Economic Trends in Washington D.C and author of “A Change of Heart About Animals” (2003), argues in this article that animals are much more like humans than we thought and that we should expand our empathy to our fellow creatures. Rifkin develops his thesis by comparing the similarities between humans and animals. An example of this is in paragraph 11 when he claims that animals show a sense of their own mortality and the mortality of their kin just like humans do. He supports this claim by giving an example of elephants standing next to their dead children for days after they have passed. The author gives that example of the elephants in order to make the reader understands just how aware these
When I was signing up for a tutorial in the summer, I looked at what looked interesting. I have always been really strong about civil rights, and had the state of mind that everyone should be treated equally. The only past knowledge I really had was about how much everyone in this class has like Black and their civil rights. I have always been really strong about the united farm workers because I read about it on my own growing up in school. Most of us can relate to these issue personalty or by family members because most of us are Black or Hispanic in this school.
In Jeremy Rifkin’s article, “A Change of Heart about Animals”, proves his statement that many of our fellow creatures also “feel pain, suffer and experience stress, affection, excitement and even love..”. I agree that animals share similar feelings as us, and I believe that they should be treated in a way that they can feel comfortable and care in their surroundings. Just because animals may not be completely the same as us, that should not give the right to a human to mistreat and abuse of an animal’s life. Animals can be well treated and cared for without giving them the right to be treated as a human.
While America may pride itself on being a country of freedom and justice, it cannot hide from its disturbing past. The Civil Rights Movement was a momentous part of US history that took place in the 20th century and was a nationwide movement for equal rights for African Americans. Segregated schools were not equal in quality or curriculum, so African-American families led the fight for equality. This court decision created enormous controversy throughout the United States. The Brown v. The Board of Education and its causes, which include the ratification of the 14th amendment, the injustice of segregated schooling, and the cases that led to it, were of apex importance to this movement.
Personally, I would improve this book by making it less complex, and giving the reader at least some closure at the end. I wouldn’t recommend this book to anyone who dislikes reading about animal deaths, as most of the characters in the story end up dying in one way or another. However, I would recommend this book to anyone who’s looking for an animal novel that’s a bit more complex compared to stories like Watership
The Negative Effects Captivity has on Orcas Orcas, also known as killer whales, have been captured and placed in captivity beginning in 1961. Not only were orcas captured and brought into captivity, many were born into captivity. An increasing amount of Orcas in captivity has started a serious conversation on whether Orcas are benefiting or suffering from being held in captivity. There are differing opinions about captivity having a positive or negative effect on the Orcas well-being. There are numerous amounts of negative effects resulting from orcas being captured and kept in captivity including: separation from pods, aggression towards other whales, aggression towards humans, a shortened lifespan, lack of exercise, tooth decay, lack of natural enrichment, unnatural reproduction, food deprivation, and the drugging of orcas.
Opinions Depend Experience When putting an animal in a life or death situation, they have no knowledge to fight back. The animal panics and tries to run, but the hunter is smarter and knows how the animal will react. BAM! The animal is done.
Isolation distances people from society emotionally or physically. As people, this road can become a dark point in our lives. From time to time we have chosen this path. However, others have been forced to live in the shadows of society due to their appearance, actions and social status. In Mary Shelly's novel ‘'Frankenstein'' the theme of isolation and abandonment is the most developed throughout the novel.
Peter Singer, a utilitarian philosopher argues that non-human species should be treated equally to human species. Singer mentions that anyone who doesn’t believe in equal rights for animals is called a speciesist. Singer also goes into detail about how human speciesists believe that the pain felt by pigs or mice is not equal to the pain experienced by humans. In this essay, I would like to defend Singer’s argument, killing animals is not justifiable. Therefore, we should stop consuming animals by becoming a vegetarian or a vegan.
Olson argues that those animals are just like us, because they do things (e.g. Sitting in our chairs, or talking, or going on holidays) like we do them. Therefore, Olson reasons that it is hard to deny that we are those
The second reason the argument is flawed is because originally, Animalism was a successful system that was equally contributed into, and the animals were happier. After the animals bravely overtook the farm from their cruel owners, they realized the liberty they gained. “Yes, it was theirs - everything that they could see was theirs! In the ecstasy of that thought, they gambolled round and round, they hurled themselves into the air in great leaps of excitement.” (pg. 22)
He supports his cause by refuting two counterarguments from those who ask if animal suffering is comparable to human suffering: those who believe animals are not as important as humans because they are not in God’s image, and those who believe animals do not think as humans and so cannot suffer as
(ch.5 pg.47) It all clearly points to the fact that all animals (and humans) have different strengths and different jobs and that they are not equal. This is also the case because some of the animals capabilities elevated their status within their society. This inequality sometimes helped the farm by providing a firm government but often lead to harsh mistreatment of many of the animals. The only reason animals often listened to the leader was because he had ferocious dogs protected him and in certain cases he used that power to protect his own interests.
Animals don’t have the intelligence as high as human beings because of their brain structure. Therefore, it is impossible for them to know humans’ feeling and care about us. It is not the animal’s fault. Animals should not be penalized and killed for our food just because of their inability to care about people. The mental state of animals is similar to the people who have serious intellectual disability.
