As a child who was brought up a Christian family, I have always wondered why anyone would deny the existence of God partly because of my upbringing and partly because I didn’t find any logical reason why anyone would be atheist. So, when I got the article, “Why I am an atheist” written by Gil Gaudia, a former professor at the State University of New York, for my assignment, I was excited. I thought that he was going to explain how an atheistic worldview corresponds to reality and list serval points why atheism is a coherent worldview. However, a significant proportion of the paper is devoted to explaining why theistic worldview is wrong. Apart from missing the entire purpose of the article, on his effort to present what he and “significant other atheists believe,” Mr. Gaudia makes several illogical fallacies and contradictions. …show more content…
At the beginning of the article, Gil Gaudia states that “one does not to choose to be an Atheist any more than one chooses to be homosexual. It just is,” whereas, ironically, the title indicates that there is a reason for him to be an atheist. Refusing “to believe in a god who would either allow or cause these unfair events,” and rejecting the idea that “forces from the supernatural world—gods, angles, saints or devils—can interact with and alter events occurring in the natural world,” is a decision one comes to after critically thinking and assessing evidence. It is not the default thinking setting of certain groups of