Opponents argue that animal euthanasia is unfair and/or cruel, because it´s the default option if an owner cannot pay for a medical procedure for their pet. There is a big difference when it comes to treating humans and animals. If humans cannot afford a procedure, they will take on debt, be forced to pay later, and will receive what they need to live. Animals on the other hand have no guarantee of care. When an animal comes in requiring surgery and the owner cannot pay, they are looking at Animal Euthanasia. Many pets die from treatable conditions because their owners cannot pay. It is understandable why the opposition argues that animal euthanasia is unfair and/or cruel, since it´s the default option if an owner cannot pay for a medical procedure