Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Discussion about animal rights
Testing on animals
Testing on animals
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Discussion about animal rights
Testing on animals
Testing on animals
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Discussion about animal rights
Animals may have similar body functions, but they can be prone to and resistant to different diseases which makes them unreliable to be tested. For example, cancer was cured in mice years ago, but human cancers are yet to be cured. This clearly shows that animals need to not be tested because of health and body differences. In addition to body functions, animal 's DNA are different than a human being’s.
Secondly, the anatomy of an animal is very similar to a human, which more than often leads to better results. Lastly, animals are much easier to handle than humans because they are more docile. There have been many arguments stating that animal experimentation is unethical due to fact that animals can suffer through a lot of pain and abuse during these experiments, but if one were to look at the positives, it is clear that the pros outweigh the
Animal Testing Controversy In Australia, Monash University carried out an experiment testing the preservability of deceased patients’ hearts waiting for organ transplants. However, the medium being tested was not a human heart. The test included twelve greyhound dogs who were first suffocated, then had their hearts taken out, put back in, and revived. The final step of the experiment included euthanizing each greyhound.
Animal testing is cruel, unjust, and wasteful, and it needs to stop. It is used to test cosmetics, to gain scientific knowledge, and for tests in schools. The Humane Society states that animal testing is tests performed on live animals for basic biology, medicinal, safety, or health research. Even small procedures have the capabilities to cause the animal high stress or discomfort. Some animals are used in future experiments, but most are killed soon after the tests.
This is because the anatomic, metabolic and cellular differences of animal and human are very much different from each other which makes them as poor test model as much as irreliable in predicting results in human beings. For instances, cancer has an absymal record of failures where both humans and animals react differently when tested with carcinogen (Greek, 2007). Besides, animal test could also mislead researchers into ignoring potential cures and treatment. Aspirin for example, can be used to reduce fever and relieve mild to moderate pain are found to be harmful to some animal species. These promising drugs may get shelved when they cause problems in animals which are not relevent for human.
Why Animal Testing is Wrong The human race has greatly benefitted through the use of animals. They have not only been a great form of companionship for people, but have also helped with the success in the world of medicine. For many years, the rights of animals and animal experimentation have been up for debate on whether or not it should be legal. Some may find that animal testing has led to major advancements in the medical world and that it is a small price to pay to save millions of lives, but others believe it is inhumane and that animals should be given the same rights as humans.
Animal testing has been used by scientists to test drugs and makeup products for many years. They have been kept in labs, poked, prodded at, observed, forced to inhale, eat, and wear substances that have killed them. Millions of animals have died each year because of this testing, and it needs to be stopped. Animal testing should not be continued because it is ineffective, it wastes lives, and is inhumane. Animal testing needs to be discontinued because it is ineffective.
Animals have similar anatomy to humans, but it is still vastly different. What works on an animal could have a totally different effect on humans. For example, according to the FDA, Vioxx, a drug used to treat arthritis, was found to be safe when tested in monkeys (and five other animal species) but has been estimated to have caused around 320,000 heart attacks and strokes and 140,000 deaths worldwide. This proves that medical testing on animals isn’t necessarily beneficial considering the physiological differences between man and animal. But that’s not the only case of medical testing gone wrong.
Fact, animals do not get many of the human diseases that people do. Such as major types of heart disease, many types of cancer, HIV, Parkinson. Instead signs of these diseases are artificially induced in animals in labratories in an attempt to mimic the human disease. It is not surprising to find that treatments showing 'promise ' in animals rarely work in humans. There was a pill that was tested in the
To start off, I think animal testing is wrong. It may benefit OUR lives, but it doesn’t for the animals being tested on. It is cruel, inhumane, and sometimes isn’t necessary for the product. There are alternatives to this and it can cause much pain and suffering to the animals. In my opinion, animal testing is wrong and here are my reasons why I think so.
Animal testing should be banned because it is an unethical process that subjects animals to so much pain. In addition, it should be banned because, it is inaccurate, unreliable, and its benefits to human beings have not yet been fully confirmed by the current research. Animal testing should be banned because it is an unethical process. According to statistics, about 128 million animals which include guinea pigs, cats, rats, hamsters, dogs, frogs, hamsters, dogs,
Should Animal Testing be Allowed? Animal testing has been a controversial issue for a long time now. Whether or not animal testing is humane or not, both sides of the argument are hard to choose from . On one hand you have the possibility of curing diseases, saving lives, and helping the human race. On the other hand you have the lives of many innocent animals who are being injected, probed, caged and mistreated for just facts.
Many people have different ideas on animal testing and if it is or is not appropriate for medical research. Many disagree, but there are some that think it’s necessary for testing to be done. Animal testing is necessary because it helps develop life saving medical treatments for not only humans, but animals, and it helps determine how medicine will react to the human body. Animal testing is appropriate for medical research because testing helps develop life saving medical treatments for humans. Without testing, scientist wouldn’t have found ways to help people with breast cancer or childhood Leukemia.
All animals are different in some way. This could mean tests on animals could be misleading. Certain chemicals could be bad for animals yet good for humans, or vice versa. Animal test are much more expensive than using a human for tests. Humane Society International has compared animal tests with in vitro counterparts.
Animals Testing Is animal testing necessary?. Should we ban expending animals in medical research or not?. More than 26 million animals are used in different countries like the United States and Canada. Animal testing may by defining as the use of animals in experiments and research that seeks to control the variable that impacts the behavior or biological system under study. Using large number of animals is mainly meant to find treatments and cure for certain diseases.