Why Is Creon According To Greek Mind Is Not As Evil

In his essay, Holt argues that Creon, according to Greek eyes is not as evil as many modern readers assume (660). He is most likely to follow the law passed by his father to protect his regime and expects the same from his son. Creon asserts, “[t]hat’s the way to behave: subordinate Everything else, my son, to your father’s will. This is what a man prays for, that he may get Sons attentive and dutiful in his house,” (Sophocles 505). Creon tries to justify his kingship as he says “no one is so foolish that he is eager to die” (Sophocles 220 cited by Holt 676), he could have ordered to kill people who went against his law. Creon tried to look good in front of the Choragus and considered himself as the state while having conversation with his son.

This lack of empathy cause modern readers to see him as evil. Holt emphasizes that we must understand fifth-century Athenian beliefs and laws. Laws are above everything even family and a King’s decision was the law. Holt implies that the play questioned if Creon was the right person to handle the office. In the play, Choragus supports Haimon stating “if what he says is sensible” and suggests Creon to listen to Haimon regarding the dead penalty to Antigone (Sophocles 585). Holt states that people of Thebes are only afraid to speak frankly to their king but pity and supports Antigone. At this point, Creon seems to resist the views opposing his principles. Accepting is not always same as applying. There will always be conflict between them. Creon’s weakness and incapability to be a king ultimately sank his family and ruined his reputation. Creon says “Lead me away. I have been rash and