ipl-logo

Why Is It Ethical To Charge Tobacco Companies Important?

544 Words3 Pages

Millions of people across America struggle with paying health insurance. While it is expensive for the average American, certain individuals have to pay more money than others. Those that use tobacco products, those that are obese, and those that have genetically inherited diseases are charged more than others with health insurance. From a provider’s point of view, doing this is logical because those individuals are at risk of health issues. Is it necessarily ethical to charge those people more than others? Depending on the situation, yes and no. People that are charged more for health care are human, and every human comes along with circumstance. The ethics behind these specific health insurance costs are relative. Is it ethical to charge tobacco users more for health insurance? The use of tobacco products come along with severe health risks, and it is uncommon in today’s society for those risks to go unanticipated. With that information considered, most tobacco users know the …show more content…

Those that are considered obese are often made aware by their doctors of the health risks obesity comes with. If they do nothing to decrease the health risks, such as attempting to maintain a healthier lifestyle, the likelihood of need treatment increases. Insurers know of this likelihood and should charge more money. Genetically inherited diseases, however, are a different story. While it makes sense for insurers to charge more to people with genetically inherited diseases, it is absolutely not ethical. Tobacco users and obese people can possibly control what they are charged for, but those with genetic diseases cannot. They do have health risks, which is what insurers recognize in order for them to charge more. However, there is often no way for these individuals to change or better their situation, so they are stuck with paying more their entire

Show More
Related
593 Words | 3 Pages

Base your answer on the information from the article. The ACA has successfully accomplished their goal by making healthcare accessible to everyone. Unfortunately, the cost remains high and most Americans are unable to afford insurance. This rationality is due to healthy American’s unable to qualify for premium tax credit and an increase in their premiums.

Read More
1130 Words | 5 Pages

Although this is under Obamacare exchanges, it shows that state-run exchanges can effectively control the cost of premiums. A state that has efficiently and effectively controlled the health insurance markets is California. Through their state-run exchanges, California has managed to control the type and price of care provided by setting up a system that required all health insurers to provide the same deductibles and benefits within each of their coverage levels (Scheffler, Para. 7). Their plan is set up so that “insurers in all marketplaces must offer a defined set of “essential health benefits” in all plans and may offer plans at four coverage levels: platinum…followed in descending order of cost and coverage benefits by gold, silver, and bronze. ”(Scheffler, Para. 7)

Read More
519 Words | 3 Pages

With those that are insured favoring a moral hazard and overusing the system could lead to a negative impact on our health care system leaving those who truly needing services paying a higher premium or

Read More
991 Words | 4 Pages

Imagine there is no requirement to purchase auto insurance to drive a car on our roads, not that auto insurance does not exist, but there is no regulation on when or even if it needs to be carried. In this situation it seems likely that many would not choose to purchase insurance until they need it, likely after an accident. Insurance companies then would reasonably assume that all, or most of those that looked to purchase the insurance were those who are in need of it, those with broken cars. Now translate that into the healthcare market, if healthcare is

Read More
1318 Words | 6 Pages

Some people are at a ton of risk, such as being old or having a history of poor health. These people in poor health are more expensive to cover simply because they hold more risk for the insurance company as they require more

Read More
1324 Words | 6 Pages

This mother works hard to make a living for her family, yet still finds it hard to make ends meet. This mother has to pay insurance for her and her 3 children at $1,000.00 dollars a month for her premium, plus her fluctuating copayments at each doctor or hospital visit on top of having to meet a $5,000.00 deductible for the insurance company to pay a hundred percent of anything. With all of that this single mother has a 20 percent co insurance which is the out of pocket expense that she has to meet each visit. Now take this very same example with a single payer source, the government. This mother can still work and make a decent living for her and her children and her healthcare will be paid for.

Read More
451 Words | 2 Pages

Market forces want to provide health care, but to me the main purpose is more profit based If market forces are running insurances they are likely to put their money first and then provide health care. Affordable health care for those may not really be affordable and if the insurance is affordable its coverage may not be

Read More
731 Words | 3 Pages

This people should be monitored in order to maintain good health and stay healthy, because the more the put-up lifestyle choices that won’t help them, the more they fall sick and the burden lies on the nation to provide health care and also pay more for insurance. But, if the put up a good lifestyle and stay in good condition, the less insurance the state will pay, we all know how health insurance or health care issues are still a problem yet to be solve. Funding is a major problem so the little we have must not be misused by a group of people. The United States of America spends 17 percent of its gross domestic product, approximately $2.7 trillion annually on health care. This in the long run puts profits into the pockets of insurance companies, drug companies’ private hospitals and medical suppliers, while the country spends more and gets less.

Read More
426 Words | 2 Pages

America is an industrialized country meaning we have developed industry to an economic rank of first world classification and we still treat healthcare as a cash cow or revenue when there are real epidemics and things that people need healthcare for and we are the only country that does this. Not many obese people have healthcare benefits which hurt us economically when people get to the point of them not being able to work because of this excess fat resulting in loss of production value, and more loss days then the employer has to pay more money for workers comp and things to this obese people versus people who aren’t, and obesity is also linked to low income households. But that is another issue in itself because America is the 2nd county

Read More
1776 Words | 8 Pages

While Obamacare is working to make sure that everyone has access to care, it is also imposing on people's right to make their own decision. Forcing people to get insurance means disregarding financial

Read More
581 Words | 3 Pages

People that already had insurance were taken off of it because it didn't meet the 10 crucial health benefits. Then their insurance goes up because it puts things in there they may not need such as maternity care. If someone clearly is not going to use something why force it upon them. Rep. Mike Rogers asked a good question “Why punish the 85 percent who have earned health-care coverage under their employer to cover the 15 percent who do not?”

Read More
458 Words | 2 Pages

No matter what your wallet may say, healthcare should be a BASIC human right for everyone. No life should be deemed less important or valuable just because they can't afford health care. People have ALWAYS been employed and work long hours every day and still can't afford to pay hospital bills. With Obamacare not only do welloff, or ordinary to poor citizens have available health insurance for the first time in years, but they can actually afford to fill prescriptions without having to worry. Americans need to get over this idea that we shouldn't pay for our services.

Read More
741 Words | 3 Pages

The United States is the only Western nation that does not authorize free health services to its people. The cost of healthcare to the uninsured is beyond prohibitive, and insurance plans are far more captivated with profit costs, rather

Read More
1043 Words | 5 Pages

There was a time, in our not too distant past that healthcare was not-for-profit. Then, during the presidency of Nixon, he opened the doors allowing for-profit systems to flourish, giving us the healthcare system we have now. It is clunky, expensive, cumbersome, and inefficient, with the goal of profits coming before any consideration of a healthy outcome for individuals. When people talk about letting the market decide prices, that's easy enough when it comes to things like

Read More
964 Words | 4 Pages

Smoking is a choice and no one is forcing that upon people. The public has been well warned about the risks of smoking; therefore, the people smoking are fully aware that their lives are at risk. Tobacco companies should not be held responsible for smoking-related illnesses and deaths because once people put the tobacco in their mouths, they are putting there own life at risk themselves, and because as individuals we have a choice on whether or not to smoke cigarette. It 's true that tobacco companies aren 't accountable for why people smoke. Nonetheless, every tobacco product has a warning label on it therefore it 's not the companies responsibility from smoking-related illnesses and deaths.

Read More

More about Why Is It Ethical To Charge Tobacco Companies Important?

Related Topics

Open Document