If the world ended today the one thing I would take is my Nike Air Force One’s. As a fan of both Nike and Under Armour I would say that Nike is better. I think Nike is better because they produce things that are in style now and they don’t just focus on one style. One reason why I think that Nike is better is because they have more clothing. Under Armour also has clothing that’s affordable but the clothing that they sell really don’t comply to my type of style.
Nike has been there in sports industry way before Under Armour. Nike first started selling shoes,manufactured by asics from japan, under the brand name Blue Ribbon Sports in United States.Despite having emerged before this so called age of information and media they readily manage to overcome other sports apparel brands like Fila, Asics ,Reebok ,Adidas mostly due to their entrepreneurial spirit .As we all know everything is industrialized in United states.
…show more content…
player’s like Stephen Curry, Cam Newton, and many more all love wearing Under Armour gear. Even though Nike has been out longer than Under Armour, under Armour still has an advantage because of the fact that they get more celebrities to sponsor there clothing and shoe brands. Some people would say that Under Armour is more comfortable and more affordable than Nike which is true even though Nike has a bigger fan base then Under Armour.
Nike is the American apparel maker, while Under Armour is the upstart. Nike is by far the larger company, in terms of key metrics like market capitalization, revenue, and net profit.
It's also the more consistent performer. Although its recent financials haven't blown the market away, the company always manages to land well in the black on the bottom line, at margins that have generally improved over the last decade or so. And for the most part, revenue has continued to head