ipl-logo

Why the Death Penalty is a Necessary Form of Justice

860 Words4 Pages

Aboubakr sebti
Assignment: persuasive essay
Awt 2
Neil webb The right to kill and the fact of using the capital punishment are really important subjects that involve every country and government even if some nations abolished it. Indeed, some countries are still using the capital punishment to convict criminals, show the severity of the population, and fear the criminals. However, personal points of view divided the population in two groups: those who support this tool and their opponents. Thus the capital punishment is appropriate for several reasons: it's deterrent, it's cost-effective; and finally, it addresses heinous crimes. The death penalty can be considered as a deterrent for crimes and can decrease the percentage of …show more content…

Many people argue that he government allocate every year a special budget for the jails and prisoners. They think that this subsidy is used to provide all the criminals with their necessities and management such as water, food and electricity regardless the number of prisoners. thus, these people may pretend that the number of criminals will decrease by killing them, but the money that will be saved will remain the same even if it will be used in a different way. In addition, the taxes will also be the same, so why killing people! While this part of population think that the government will not save money when we kill people, I argue that by using the capital punishment, the government will save money; which can be used differently and in other fields. For instance, the money saved can be used to strengthen and armor the military service; which may lead to the decrease of crimes. A recent study made by LE MONDE estimates that the capital punishment costs 186 million dollars between 1979 and 2000. According to the report, a case resulting in a death penalty coasts 300 dollars, almost 5000 dollars less when the death penalty is not used. Thus we can see that a state can save almost 180 million dollars. In short, capital punishment may decrease the number of prisoners which may lead to the

Show More
Related
1325 Words | 6 Pages

The death penalty on the other hand would have been effective if the overall public minded to consider it a system for ending criminal acts. While a monstrous number would ensure the nonattendance of the death penalty in their real system, the wrongdoing rate continues going higher for countries that still practice the death penalty. Regardless, there is lacking accurate data to exhibit that death penalty has been convincing similarly as maintaining a strategic distance from criminal acts. It infers

Read More
1997 Words | 8 Pages

While many opponents argue the economics of the issue, they fail to acknowledge that the main goals of punishment are to correct behavior that is deviant from the law and to prevent similar incidences from occurring. Without capital punishment, the culprits would not have to confront the potential of death, meaning that the marginal cost of violent crime would be diminished. Therefore, capital punishment is an effective method to deter

Read More
744 Words | 3 Pages

This paper will serve to show that capital punishment is not, in fact, ethically permissible. I will argue this by explaining the government’s duty to its people, and how capital punishment is indeed a violation of these prima facie duties. 1. The government has a duty to protect its people from harm (including murder, abuse of power, etc.). 2.

Read More
582 Words | 3 Pages

The capital punishment is well supported in this article. It clearly shows how ethos, pathos and logos support the why the capital punishment should be kept and not taken away. The reader is heavily given enough information to go towards the side of keeping the capital punishment. While there is little information why the punishment shouldn’t be used its not supported as well.

Read More
1646 Words | 7 Pages

Support for capital punishment requires valuing retribution over rehabilitation. Those who favor capital punishment value highly the closure it provides to the families of the victims, and they believe that it deters would be murderers from killing. Retribution, closure and deterrence are the main reasons in favor of the death penalty. Opponents of capital punishment generally believe that it is hypocritical and immoral for the state

Read More
129 Words | 1 Pages

Capital Punishment helps deterrence rates, and cost options for the future, and if the death penalty is inhumane, there will no longer be doubt on whether it is

Read More
265 Words | 2 Pages

Keeping someone in prison costs more than executing them. The death penalty would also make people more secure. the death

Read More
791 Words | 4 Pages

Should America continue to allow the death penalty? This essay will tell you why America should not be continue the death penalty. For starters, the death penalty is punishment by death; usually resulting after a crime that America calls capital crimes or capital offences. There are many of reasons why the death penalty should not be carried out in America or anywhere “Application of the death penalty tends to be arbitrary and capricious; for similar crimes, some are sentenced to death while others are not.”

Read More
1145 Words | 5 Pages

This article discusses individual cases and crimes and gives analysis of the arguments made against death penalty in real world. Firstly it discusses the deterrence argument while going through a number of cases. The conclusion is that it has no effect on reducing homicides but ironically it breeds violence as in some cases offenders committed a capital crime in a territory where execution still prevails while they could have easily avoided it. Second thing discussed is the cost, the research in article shows that it costs significantly more money to put a convict to death than to incarcerate him for life in a prison. Moreover it is shown that in many cases criminals are executed while there are reasonable doubts in their convictions and some have avoided execution by just a few hours before being exonerated.

Read More
424 Words | 2 Pages

Deterrence theory states that people follow the law because they are scare of getting caught or being punished. In this article, “The Death Penalty Deters Crime,” David Muhlhausen, expert on criminal justice programs in the Heritage Foundation’s Center for Data Analysis and a research fellow in empirical policy analysis, confirms the deterrence theory. By means of statistical data and research dating, Muhlhausen contends that the death penalty does deters murder crime which ultimately saves lives. He also believes that executions and murder rates are somehow connected to each other. Even though, some adequate emotional appeals appeared, Muhlhausen’s article failed to prove, logically, the deterrence theory.

Read More
873 Words | 4 Pages

Capital punishment, or the death penalty, is a legal process in which a person is put to death as a punishment for a crime by the government of a nation. The United States is in the minority group of nations that uses the death penalty. There are thirty-three states that allow capital punishment and seventeen states that abolished it (Death Penalty Information Center). The morality of the death penalty has been debated for many years. Some people want capital punishment to be abolished due to how it can cost a lot more than life imprisonment without parole, how they think it is immoral to kill, and how innocent people can be put to death.

Read More
596 Words | 3 Pages

However, for the type of punishments such as the death penalty, it is unclear what is the beneficial factor and government intentions. The death penalty program is a greater burden to incarceration. The death penalty program involves longterm imprisonment, prior to and following the imposition of a death row sentence, high cost to supply prison staff, court staff, lawyers, and the prison system. However, there is lack of benefit to society considering the evidence

Read More
745 Words | 3 Pages

Ending Capital Punishment There are many benefits to ending capital punishment. First, executing someone is very expensive. The numerous appeals, hearings, and other court procedures take up a lot of time, money, and facilities. Compared to a life sentence, an execution costs significantly more.

Read More
666 Words | 3 Pages

The death penalty is a very controversial topic for obvious reasons, everyone has their own opinion on whether it should be used and when it shouldn’t, or possibly that it should never be allowed to be used. The problem with everyone having so many opinions is that often facts and opinions are mixed and exaggerated to get a point across. So I will be writing about how it is less efficient than many pro-death penalty activists say in terms of money, deterrence, and whether it is moral. My first point is whether the death penalty is effective in terms of money.

Read More
767 Words | 4 Pages

Why death penalty must end ‘’An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind,’’ said Mahatma Gandhi. The execution of someone who has possibly done a crime is an inhuman act. Death penalty is hypocritical and flawed. If killing is wrong, why do we kill when a criminal has done the crime of killing someone? In this essay, I will write why death penalty should end by writing about the violation of human rights, execution of innocent people, the fact that it does not deter crime and money.

Read More

More about Why the Death Penalty is a Necessary Form of Justice

Related Topics

Open Document