ipl-logo

Why Is The Kansas Nebraska Act Important To American History

764 Words4 Pages

Have you ever wondered how we founded Kansas and Nebraska into America? Well it wasn’t as easy as just finding it and claiming it, it took a lot of controversy over slavery. The Nebraska Act was the one who really started a major argument over slavery and whether or not it should be in those states. The Kansas-Nebraska Act was important, it was significant to American History, and it led to the Civil War. The Kansas-Nebraska Act was significant to American history because it caused another party to form, and it led to the Civil War because it had split up the Union. The Kansas- Nebraska Act was an important event to many Americans. The Kansas-Nebraska Act all started with Stephen A. Douglas he thought that the Missouri Compromise was an inconvenient act set upon. So he was promoting a train expansion through the northern plains in the western territory. Stephen A. Douglas wanted to have an eastern terminus in Chicago, Illinois; where he owned real estate. In order for his proposal to move forward he felt as though that in which the territory the railroads would pass through Kansas and Nebraska territories but, it …show more content…

The Kansas-Nebraska Act would violate the Missouri Compromise, which had been keeping the union from falling apart for 34 years. Almost all of the Southern Whigs voted for the bill and all of the Northern Whigs opposed it. This caused there to be conflict and no agreement could be found, thus causing the Southern Whigs to be known as Democrats and the Northern Whigs to stay Whigs. It had split up the Whigs and Democrats to form a new party; the Republicans. They were anti-slavery. This event happened because the bill had passed causing the Northerners to be outraged pushing them closer to the Civil War. The Kansas-Nebraska Act was the first major experience of conflict about slavery that the United States had

Show More
Related

How Did The Civil War Affect Sectionalism

602 Words | 3 Pages

President Abraham Lincoln battled the Kansas- Nebraska Act. Many looked at slavery as cruel, sad, and unfair which was one of the reasons why people thought of the idea to get it abolished. People who hold a high political power up north was scared that the extension of slavery moving toward the west that the states would give the states down south influence in such areas. When Abraham Lincoln was elected to be the president of the United States the other eleven states came from the Union. Lincoln thought this was very unacceptable and he decided to declare war to preserve the

Read More

Examples Of Tipping The Scales Of Slavery

183 Words | 1 Pages

With tensions high, it was only natural for proslavery and antislavery groups to desire to claim the state and tip the scales in their favor. Due to the growing immorality and violence within Kansas, sectionalism tore a bigger hole through the nation. Once the Kansas-Nebraska

Read More

To What Extent Was The Kansas-Nebraska Act Of 1854

1383 Words | 6 Pages

The Kansas-Nebraska Act was a bill that essentially disregarded and relinquished the Missouri Compromise. The Kansas-Nebraska Act stated that any westward expansion of the United States was to have the decision on slavery made via popular sovereignty. Popular sovereignty, in regards to the Kansas-Nebraska Act, was the idea that the decision on slavery in a region should be decided by the people who live there. This seemed fair, but the issue with instating popular sovereignty was that the parameters of the Missouri Compromise stated that slavery could not exist anywhere above the 36°30° line (History.com). Therefore, popular sovereignty would entirely disregard important factors of the Missouri Compromise, which was regarded by many as a strong force in holding the Union

Read More

Kansas Nebraska Act Of 1854 Summary

670 Words | 3 Pages

Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 Throughout the ideas of sectionalism within the Northern and Southern states, The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 has caused a division within borders, paved the way for the issue of slavery to increase, and the result of Bleeding Kansas. The issue between the borders had to be resolved, as to the decision of Kansas becoming a free or slave state. President Abraham Lincoln spoke out against the idea, “Lincoln laid out his objections to the Act and resurrected his political career in a brilliant speech at Peoria on October 16, 1854”. (Monroe, R.D.) Lincoln also wondered how it was morally right to treat people based off of popular vote, “Lincoln criticized popular sovereignty, questioning how it was that this doctrine

Read More

Osage Tribe Would Have Never Been In Favor Of The 1854 Kansas-Nebraska Act

532 Words | 3 Pages

The 1854 Kansas-Nebraska Act was an act, which allowed new territories to decide if they were a free or slave state by popular sovereignty (Civilwar.org, Kansas-Nebraska Act). Kansas-Nebraska Act negated the Missouri Compromise. Missouri Compromise was an effort by the congress to diffuse the political rivalries triggered by the request of Missouri in 1819 for admission as a state in which supported slavery (Garraty and Foner). This was done to restore the balance of slave and free states at the time. Kansas-Nebraska Act violated the compromise that was made in the Missouri Compromise, it reignited the disagreement between the anti and pro-slavery factions, which lead to violent events.

Read More

Missouri Compromise That Led To The Civil War

824 Words | 4 Pages

The southern senators disapproved of this idea since the region laid north of the 36°30′ line and the Missouri Compromise stated that it would become a free state. Since Douglas wanted to support, he decided creating two territories would be the best thing, so he added in a new territory, Kansas. He felt that the people would decide whether or not Kansas was a free or slave state. This led to Bleeding Kansas, a time of violence during the settling of Kansas. John Brown led the anti-slavery fighters.

Read More

The Kansas-Nebraska Act

135 Words | 1 Pages

Esmeralda, great post! The Kansas-Nebraska Act was an 1854 bill that ordered "famous sovereignty"– enabling pioneers of a domain to choose whether subjugation would be permitted inside another state's fringes. Proposed by Stephen A. Douglas– Abraham Lincoln's rival in the powerful Lincoln-Douglas debates– the bill toppled the Missouri Compromise's utilization of scope as the limit amongst slave and free an area. The contentions that emerged between master bondage and abolitionist subjection pioneers in the fallout of the demonstration's section prompted the time of brutality known as Bleeding Kansas and helped made ready for the American Civil War (1861-65). This 1854 bill to sort out western domains turned out to be a piece of the political

Read More

Why Was The Kansas Nebraska Act Important To American History

881 Words | 4 Pages

There was only two things you could have your mind set on the one or the other. The Kansas-Nebraska Act was important to American History and it led to the Civil War. The Kansas-Nebraska Act was significant to American history, it was the breakup the lead to the Democratic and Republican Parties and it led to the civil war because

Read More

Civil War Dbq Essay

944 Words | 4 Pages

This issue forced people to choose sides and contributed to the division of the nation. The Kansas/Nebraska Act exemplified the tension between the sides. This act promised

Read More

The Compromise Of 1850, And The Kansas-Nebraska Act

747 Words | 3 Pages

Soon, Northerners began to try to organize Kansas and Nebraska. They wanted the land for farms and a transcontinental railroad that either started or ending in Chicago. On the other hand, however, the Southern senators blocked the attempts to organize this land. Due to this controversial issue, Stephen Douglas proposed the Kansas-Nebraska Act and decided that popular sovereignty would be used to decide on the act. Before the act was accepted or rejected, the north and south both sent groups to Kansas.

Read More

Differences Between Lincoln And Frederick Douglass

691 Words | 3 Pages

Abraham Lincoln, Frederic Douglass, were one of the most appealing well-known speakers, people who did believe that slavery was morally wrong and devote their lives to fight for freedom. However, there are several differences between the view of the Constitution’s position differences between Abraham Lincoln and Frederick Douglass. Kansas-Nebraska Act indicated that the recognition of slavery should be determined by the decision of these residents (popular or squatter sovereignty). This act itself conflicted heavily with the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional, which was essentially seen as the admittance of slavery anywhere in the country. This act made a political issue of confrontation between North and South.

Read More

Civil War Dbq

1299 Words | 6 Pages

During the mid-nineteenth century, the controversy over the morality of slavery and the rights of African Americans overshadowed America’s efforts of building a united nation. In fact, this controversy tore America apart. Abraham Lincoln was not only one of the leading anti-slavery advocates, but he also eventually became president during this tumultuous era. Many events occurred prior to the start of the Civil War that shaped Lincoln’s thinking and his approach to abolishing slavery. These events include the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, the Dred Scott decision of 1857, and Lincoln’s senate race against Stephen A. Douglas.

Read More

The Effects Of Sectionalism On Early American Society

1015 Words | 5 Pages

The Missouri Compromise included the 36 30 line to split the slave states and the non-slave states(Missouri was- at the time- the only exception to this rule). Both sides were seemingly happy with the Missouri Compromise until the newly gained Mexican territory was added into the equation. The Great Compromise was made to settle which areas of land would allow slavery and had objections on both sides. New states such as California (which were extensive and split down the width of the country) did not become slave states, but it gave the Southern slave states a chance to be even more harsh towards their slaves and push against the North for more control. The Kansas-Nebraska Act favored the South over the North because the 36 30 line was erased to make room for popular sovereignty, giving the South the chance to influence the new states to become pro-slavery.

Read More

Manifest Destiny And Territorial Expansion

257 Words | 2 Pages

Lauren Williams Period 11 Group 5 The United States was united by the addition of states through Manifest Destiny and territorial expansion, which inflicted feelings of Nationalism, until the existence of slavery was threatened. Disagreements over whether the newly acquired territory should be slave or free led to the Kansas – Nebraska Act, which did not prevent slave rebellions or the Wilmot Proviso that proposed the outlawing of slavery.

Read More

Cause Of Civil War Essay

497 Words | 2 Pages

This act allowed the territories of Kansas and Nebraska to decide themselves if they wanted to be slave or free. Many people flocked to these territories to vote. Northerners and Southerners bribed many people to move to the territories and vote for or against slavery. Pro-Slavery settlers won the first election, but anti-slavery settlers charged them with fraud and another election was held. Violence erupted while the second election was taking place.

Read More

More about Why Is The Kansas Nebraska Act Important To American History

Open Document