ipl-logo

Why Is William Pennsylvania A Better Colony

712 Words3 Pages

Pennsylvania would be the best colony in England’s North America to live in. I would prefer to live in the Pennsylvania colony because of their success economically, their accepting community of Quakers, their strong government system and finally their agriculture. Pennsylvania was one of the few colonies to have good farming, no use of slaves, and total equality. Compared to other colonies, Pennsylvania is an easy choice of a place to live. William Penn founded and planned out Pennsylvania. A large reason of why Pennsylvania was successful was because of its long planning and recruiting of colonists. William Penn brought people who were needed for the colony to thrive such as farmers, artisans, and laborers. He also brought of many different …show more content…

The colonial government of Pennsylvania believed in people governing themselves with laws voted in by the people. All of this was made possible by William Penn in 1682 when he published his "frame of government," which was to be submitted to the people of the province for approval. In 1683 this was amended, in the second Assembly of the province, and a charter of liberties granted which made Pennsylvania almost fully a representative democracy. Although still liberal as the constitution. But then people started to want more concessions and privileges so William Penn in his last visit to province granted a new character which was still liberal but granted more power to the people, who from that time forward had full political …show more content…

I would much rather live with the Quakers rather than Puritans in Massachusetts. The Puritans did not have social equality; people with other beliefs did not have as much rights as puritans. This also takes place in New York; the textbook says, “property holding and political power remained highly divided and highly unequal in New York” (44). Life would be unfair in these colonies unlike how it is in Pennsylvania. I am also not a fan of slavery. I would not live in a colony like Georgia where the slaves outnumber the settlers and are often worked to death! There are so many faults in other colonies that can not be found

Show More
Related
159 Words | 1 Pages

In 1681 William Penn wanted more land, so King Charles agreed to give him a charter for the West New Jersey Colony. It was renamed and called Pennsylvania. Penn named the capital of the colony Philidelphia. Then in 1682, he received Delaware as a part if Pennsylvania.

Read More
1117 Words | 5 Pages

The settlers of Pennsylvania were mostly Quakers with other Europeans who wanted freedom. The Quakers weren’t welcome in England and wanted to find a place where they would be treated equally. They believed in simple lifestyles and wanted all men to be treated equally. The Quakers refused to fight in wars, pay taxes to the Church of England, or bow to the king. The Quakers and others who wanted freedom were the settlers of

Read More
642 Words | 3 Pages

The Chesapeake and New England colonies developed differently because of their motivation, preparation, and demographics. One of the biggest differences between these two regions is the motivation to establish their colonies. New England was north of the Chesapeake region, and included Massachusetts Bay Colony, Plymouth, Rhode Island, and Connecticut. The New Englanders were Puritans, who sought religious freedom where they would be free to practice as they wished.

Read More
1527 Words | 7 Pages

It is well known among historians that William Penn sought a peaceful partnership with the Native Americans that were in Pennsylvania at the time. Dreaming of a “Holy Experiment,” Penn wished for a colony that promoted religious freedom with good relations among the settlers and Native Americans. This can be demonstrated with the various letters, deeds, and laws written by Penn, all respecting the Native American people. One can clearly see that he wanted diplomacy as a top priority for his colony. One letter available is the Letter from William Penn to the Kings of the Indians in Pennsylvania.

Read More
526 Words | 3 Pages

The New England and Chesapeake colonies were established during the early 1700s. Despite the population originating from England, the regions had distinct societies. This was due to the fact that many settlers voyaged to the New World in search of riches, to seek new lives, or for religious freedom. They differed socially, politically, economically, and geographically.

Read More
1002 Words | 5 Pages

Between 1681-1685 there were warrants prepared to try to make Pennsylvania remain connected to the homeland and the king. This is one thing that Penn did not want to happen, so appropriately, in 1686, Penn was able to have his charter dropped from the list of charters controlled by the homeland, as long as

Read More
972 Words | 4 Pages

The 13 Colonies are broken down into 3 parts, Middle, Southern, and New England Colonies. There were many similarities and differences between all of the 13 Colonies. Many of them ranging from their climate and geography to the role women and African Americans played. A variety of people came from all around the world to the 13 Colonies for many different reasons. In the Middle Colonies, there was a very diverse population.

Read More
516 Words | 3 Pages

Would you rather live in a world filled with disorder or a world with opportunities of having a successful life? Around the 1600s to the late 1700s, many people moved from England to the colonies. They came for multiple purposes- to fix their political, economic, religious, and social difficulties. The main reason that people moved to the colonies was because of social reasons, some include moving away from class discrimination, joining family, as well as inviting others to join by laying out inviting and fair rules to persuading others to come. The first reason why people wanted to leave England was because of class discrimination.

Read More
1099 Words | 5 Pages

Although all the colonists all came from England, the community development, purpose, and societal make-up caused a distinct difference between two distinct societies in New England and the Chesapeake region. The distinctions were obvious, whether it be the volume of religious drive, the need or lack of community, families versus single settlers, the decision on minimal wage, whether or not articles of agreements were drawn for and titles as well as other social matters were drawn, as well as where loyalties lay in leaders. New England was, overall, more religious than the Chesapeake region. Settlers in New England were searching relief for religious persecution in Europe. Puritans, Quakers, and Catholics were coming in droves to America searching for an opportunity to have religious freedom.

Read More
776 Words | 4 Pages

New England’s economy would also be influenced by the British tax later that would cause Americans to revolt many of which trusted in their faith to guide them The Puritans who settled in Massachusetts Bay Colony in 1630 were also motivated by religious beliefs. They believed in the idea of a "city upon a hill," a vision of a holy community that would serve as an example to the rest of the world (American YAWP, 2.6). This belief led to a strict social order and a commitment to the moral and spiritual purity of the community. It also led to conflicts with other religious groups, such as the Quakers, who were seen as a threat to the Puritan social order.

Read More
752 Words | 4 Pages

The colonies of Massachusetts and Virginia were a start of the new world for England. These were founded by similar people but, with their strikingly differences, grew into separate political, economic and social structures. Both settlements arose from over-crowdedness in England: people wanted a better life. Virginia was settled by men who were single and looking for opportunities and wealth. They were part of the Anglican religion.

Read More
877 Words | 4 Pages

The New England colonies were first founded in the last 16th to 17th century as a sanctuary for differing religious groups. New England was made up of the Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, and New Hampshire. New Hampshire, however, was formed for economic reasons instead of religious ones. The Chesapeake region, which is made up of the colonies of Maryland and Virginia, was founded by the British colonies for the purpose of farming. However, by the 1700’s, despite both being settled by Englishmen, New England and the Chesapeake region had developed differently.

Read More
746 Words | 3 Pages

They were getting away from issues they had experienced in England, which took into consideration colonists to be similar. As stated previously, the opportunities that the colonists in the New England settlements and the Chesapeake region colonies were

Read More
722 Words | 3 Pages

Both the Chesapeake colonies and the New England colonies were vital to Britain’s atlantic trade. They both had large populations and booming economies. However, they both eventually established their own cultures that were different from each other. The colonies’ differing beliefs, environments, and labor lead to the contrasting cultures. The New England Colonies were a Puritanical society, who preached against excess.

Read More
1043 Words | 5 Pages

Although they have numerous differences their characteristics resulted from one important factor, which is, the reason the settlers came to the New World. This had an impact on the settlement, economically, socially, and politically. Settlements in the Chesapeake region included Maryland, Virginia, Pennsylvania and the New Jerseys. The first English colony, Jamestown,

Read More

More about Why Is William Pennsylvania A Better Colony

Related Topics

Open Document