ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Paying College Athletes

2039 Words9 Pages

Paying college athletes has been a trending topic around the National Collegiate Athletic Association. Universities should not allow players to receive compensation for their performances. When money is involved many problems can arise. There are many different kinds of sports within a university; thus causing, many questions to develop. For example, will all sport athletes get paid and will some athletes get paid more than other? Also, what if an athlete gets hurt will the university still pay an injured athlete? It is not practical for all colleges to pay their athletes. If student athletes get paid, the money will effect the university, the athletes and many other people. Despite the fact that college athletes bring in some of the universities' revenue college athletes should not be paid. If universities were to pay one college athlete for a sport they would have to pay all athletes. According to NCAA.com, more than 460,000 NCAA student-athletes compete in 24 sports yearly. That is a great deal of athletes competing for their …show more content…

There could be controversy over the athlete's contract with the amount they are getting paid. Also, the kids that do not play sports might feel they are being treated unfairly because they do not get paid. College athletes get offered a full ride to a big ten college for free: “other kids have to get loans worth tons of money that they will have to pay back for the rest of their lives” (Bagaria and Birkenes). Paying these athletes would cause too many problems that the university doesn’t have time to deal with. College is a place that people decide to go to because they enjoy everything the campus has to offer and to get a degree. It would not be fair for the students if they would not receive any income for the clubs or other things they are involved in. Paying these athletes would not be fair and it would damage all college

Show More
Related
103 Words | 1 Pages

College schools provide for student athletes enough. They pay for everything provided for the the students whether it’s scholarships or playing in the school games. Through it all it really doesn’t matter if they (the athletes) get paid for, it’s the opportunity that the coaches and university give them to play on the

Read More
537 Words | 3 Pages

Are they students or employees? They spend more time with the sport than in school. Student athletes should be acknowledged for their performances. College athletes should be paid to play because they bring money into the school, advertisement, and they perform the same tasks of pros. College kids bring in thousands of dollars every game day.

Read More
1676 Words | 7 Pages

This is a preposterous idea, anyhow the athletes get paid to be a student in the form of a scholarship, which

Read More
1944 Words | 8 Pages

What the colleges are willing to give the athletes most likely not be the amount the athlete wants. Paying athletes will create tension between the athletes and make them want to go where the most money is, rather than where they will benefit best. The smaller schools would not have the opportunity of having great players on their teams. Tensions could lead athletes to quit their sport or file a lawsuit against the school concerning their pay. College athletes have tutors they can call right away if they need help academically, or financially.

Read More
750 Words | 3 Pages

The debate over whether or not college athletes should be paid has really heated up over the past couple of years. Imagine you are a college athlete; your typical daily routine would consist of an early wake up, an early morning practice, classes and tutoring sessions, and another practice or workout. Oh yeah, you have to fit in time for 4-5 meals to maintain energy throughout such an exhausting day. Athletes have to follow this routine all year long making it impossible to obtain a job to earn money. All of this hard work and time leads to success on and off the field but it also leads to enormous profit for the NCAA.

Read More
622 Words | 3 Pages

Statistically showing, at least 100,000 college football players get hurt yearly. College football player’s should get paid to play because these players put themselves at risk for injury, college football is a job, not p.e, and it will help players adjust to college socially and economically. Colleges and the NCAA can make money selling jerseys and other souvenirs that might include the likeness of players, yet the actual players never receive a cent. Every time a football player steps onto the field, they’re risking themselves for injury.

Read More
367 Words | 2 Pages

Paying the athletes could cause many lawsuits for the University. Female athletes can sue if male athletes are getting paid more than them. Athletes that receive more game time and score more points would most likely receive a higher salary than other teammates who do not score as much or play as much. Those problems could cause

Read More
1526 Words | 7 Pages

There has been a growing argument in recent years, of whether or not college athletes should receive payment from their schools. Though people from both sides of the argument have valid points to make, it is obvious that not paying college athletes is more beneficial to the athletes as well as the universities. The benefits that college athletes currently receive are better than the alternative of treating sports as a job in order to receive a salary. The positive side of receiving an athletic scholarship over a yearly salary is much greater than the other way around.

Read More
1317 Words | 6 Pages

It includes only those funds that end up in the NCAA 's bank account.” The FCAA being the organization that would collect and distribute the capital. This research paper described why college athletes should be paid. They make personal sacrifices, and take risks in order to produce revenue for their schools.

Read More
1273 Words | 6 Pages

If colleges began to pay their athletes, then they could build a bad reputation for being mercenary and lose their educational reputation If they are allowed to play, then it can be financially detrimental to the college because there are many flaws in the system. College athletes should not be compensated for their actions regarding athletic activities, no matter what sport or level they compete on. The idea that college athletes should or shouldn 't be paid

Read More
978 Words | 4 Pages

For example, if it wasn’t for basketball players, Gonzaga University would need to spend a lot more money on building a name recognition to students not located on the West. Everyone has their own opinion, but mine is that college athletes should be paid. The amount of time they put into their sport, the amount of money everyone else is making off of them, and their overall importance to the school are only three of a myriad of reasons why they should be paid. These athletes are not only students, but employees to their universities. They are a core member of many university’s marketing team.

Read More
1538 Words | 7 Pages

College athletes put in a lot of time, effort, and work into the sport they’ve played since they were young, but they aren’t getting paid for it. These student athletes deserve to be paid because they put in countless hours of hard work and balance sports with school work. The first reason athletes in college do deserve to be compensated is because they don 't have time to fit in work with a school and athletic schedule. College athletes don’t have time to get a real job. Student athletes have a very busy schedule, they don’t have time to fit in a job.

Read More
413 Words | 2 Pages

Some say student-athletes deserve to be paid for their effort while playing, this is because the NCAA over-profits student success. It takes $1.6 billion in revenue to distribute unfairly to the coaches and themselves instead of giving back to more scholarships they can give it back to the players earning that money. The truth is that scholarships are fair financial trade. According

Read More
1254 Words | 6 Pages

This isn’t just about a football team getting paid or a basketball team getting paid. If only one of these teams are getting paid or even both. Many people in other sports will be aggravated because most athletes believe that they are just as athletic and should be paid if the others are. This is where college would struggle paying all the athletes because track teams do not bring in nearly the same amount of money as a football team does. Also one of the most important and greatest parts about participating and becoming an athlete at a university with a scholarship is that most of the time athletes graduate without the stress of having loans because the school paid for most of them.

Read More
1113 Words | 5 Pages

In today 's life college athletes are not pleased because they don’t get any compensation at all from their sport they are playing. There is a lot of similarities between professionals players and college athletes players like to broadcast of their games, they both can seen on the Tv or media. They both let people know the intense game that the players play, which gives the people a lot of excitement and grabs the people attention to pay for a ticket. Does it affect the college athlete to not get paid at all? Well according to some experts, it does because athletes need that money to pay college tuitions, to buy books, to pay apartment rent, etc.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Paying College Athletes

Open Document