Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analyze the role of brutus in julius caesar
Role of brutus in julius caesar
The role of brutus in julius caesar
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Even though he did it out of consideration for their well being, Brutus murdered their beloved ruler. Caesar was not ambitious, Antony proves that. Brutus was ambitious, but not nearly as ambitious as Antony. Cleverly placed words make all the difference regardless of how Julius Caesar
Killing is bad but most people do it anyway as Brutus did to his best friend Julius Caesar who happened to be the soon-to-be emperor of Rome. although Brutus used a lot of Pathos in his speech, Antony delivers the more effective speech because he used more Ethos and Logos in his speech to connect logically with his audience of fellow Romans while using 2 more of the three rhetorical devices. Antony’s speech is more effective than Brutus’s because, in Act 3 Scene 2 lines 1-3 of Shakespeare's play, Antony says “Here’s a parchment with the seal of Caesar; I found it in his closet, ‘tis his will” Antony is using Caesar’s will to show he knew what he was talking about to the Roman citizens. Antony used Caesar's will as a source for everyone to
To prevent Caesar from making Rome a dictatorship, envious conspirators, with the help of Brutus, plan to kill Caesar. Caesar’s death leaves Antony scarred and he intends to avenge his friend. Antony goes to war with Octavian and is defeated. As a result, he kills himself. Although Antony doesn’t include evidence of how Brutus wasn’t honorable, Antony’s speech is effective at convincing the Roman Citizens that Caesar's murder was not justified.
Brutus clearly shows this when he states, “Had you rather Caesar were living, and die all slaves” (III,ii. 21). Brutus justifies his reasoning by reassuring that the people do sincerely want Caesar dead. He accomplishes this when he gives a non-fictional example to the people that will make them not regret Caesar’s death. In contrast, Antony desperately tries to persuade the people into feeling remorse for the killing of Caesar and possibly inspiring a rebellion against Brutus. He says, “I thrice presented him a kingly crown, which he did thrice refuse” (III,ii. 91-92).
I believe in order for a person to be considered noble they should also show to be loyal as well. The issue here is not a measure of nobleness it is a measure of loyalty and weakness. Brutus himself wanted to be like Caesar. Brutus wanted to have Caesar’s power and influence over the people of Rome. What Brutus did not know is
However some may postulate that Brutus was a noble man in killing Caesar and “saving” Rome. After all Caesar was becoming an overeager tyrant that wanted to take over Rome. Brutus was benevolent in saving the republic rather than let a ruthless tyrant rule Rome. This argument fails to consider that Caesar “hath brought many captives home to Rome whose ransoms did the general coffers fill. ”(5.1.87-88)
Brutus says, “I honour him: but, as he was ambitious, I slew him. There are tears for his love; joy for his fortune; honour for his valour; and death for his ambition.” Explaining that although he honored Caesar, he was ambitious and by killing him there was still joy for him but also death for his ambition. However, Antony’s persuasion and emotion made his speech better because Brutus only used “what if’s” and he couldn’t prove that Caesar would actually do the things he said. While Brutus went on about the possibilities, Antony used evidence of past events that everyone witnessed.
Was Brutus Noble? In Shakespeare 's’ The Tragedy Of Julius Caesar, one of the main characters, Marcus Brutus, is found dead by the noble Mark Antony, and is called “The Noblest Roman Of Them All” (Julius Caesar Act 5, scene 5, 68–72). Antony 's’ statement is a true one for many reasons. The first reason would be that Brutus was a man who valued his friendships over all else.
Brutus realized the great harm Caesar could bring to Rome if the was crowned king. Although Brutus was easily persuaded by Cassius to go as far as committing a murder, Brutus did it because he thought that it was the best for Rome. Brutus does what he thinks is the absolute best for Rome which really shows his great honor and
While Brutus spoke well, but had no real factual standpoint, Antony gave many examples of Caesar’s achievements. In his speech he uses Pathos, Logos, Ethos, and Situational Irony to sway his audience. He uses Brutus’ and Cassius’ precious honor and Caesar’s achievements against them, saying, “When that the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept./ Ambition should be made of sterner stuff./ Yet Brutus says he was ambitious,/ And Brutus is an honorable man” (3.2.90-93). In this statement and many other statements following the same pattern Antony degrades the honor and the arguments of Caesar’s ambition that were made by Brutus and the other conspirators.
Antony was talking about how honorable Brutus is but as he gets to talking about how Brutus kills him, he states “He was your friend, faithful and just to me” (2.2.13). Antony knew how great of a friend was to him, but Caesar being a king would change all of that. Caesar would be a different man, and not as faithful toward Antony. When Brutus speaks and his first words were “be patient till the last” (2.2.1). Brutus wants the people to listen to his reason, and not think he is a murderer but a man with a quest.
What we think about Brutus being Noble... It came to terms knowing to think that Brutus might’ve done the right thing because, although Caesar was trying to bring the city of Rome down and someone had to stop him. For this, we know that Brutus was the hero of Rome and then his life soon ended in the heat of battle. Brutus and the conspirators were trying to make Rome a great city again, but this time under Brutus’s rule, But It ended badly.
Throughout the story, Brutus was one of the few characters that understood the way power could change a man. He feared that Caesar would become a tyrant with all his new power and that Rome would suffer from his rule. He states this multiple times in the story. During Caesar’s funeral, Brutus states “Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more,” (JC 3.2.23). It is clear to see here that Brutus was justified in killing Caesar because his intentions are good.
Throughout his speech, he uses repition and cynical statements directed torwards Brutus, while also saving Caesar’s reputation. Specifically, Antony repeatedly used the word “honorable” to describe Brutus and contradicting his speech. Antony used sympathy to his advantage, considering his obvious friendship with Caesar. Brutus only had one point, which was that he killed Caesar for Rome. Antony’s speech was better and more persuasive
(II, i, 53-55) which allows to say that he wants Rome to be just and do whatever it takes to maintain it away from any threat. Indeed, Brutus states this very clearly when he says, “If it’s for the good of all Romans, I’d do it even if it meant my death. Let the gods give me good luck only as long as I love honor more than I fear death.” (I, ii, 86-88), he explicitly says that the good of the majority is over any feeling or personal benefit which in this case is the love of Caesar for him and viceversa, and the throne. To conclude, Brutus is a complex character that is characterized by three recurrent traits: his well-intention, his hypocrisy, and his naivet.