ipl-logo

Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay

878 Words4 Pages

Getting betrayed is never a good feeling. Especially when it’s someone you trust in your life, and you consider to be a good friend. In the play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, Julius Caesar’s closest friends both make a speech for his “funeral”. The speeches were made moments after being stabbed to death by his friend, Brutus, who thought he was doing the right thing. Brutus thought that if he didn’t kill Caesar, he might become ambitious and ruin Rome and its traditions. After giving the speech, Antony, another friend of Caesars but also a person who was very fond of him, gave a speech as well. He spoke with respect for Caesar and during his speech he persuaded the minds of the citizens of Rome to see that what happened …show more content…

He keeps using the phrases, “Brutus is an honourable man” and “Brutus says he was ambitious” and sooner or later the audience catches on and notices his sarcasm and how Caesar was actually not ambitious at all. Antony uses evidence from the Lupercal saying, “You all did see that on the Lupercal I thrice presented him a kingly crown, which he did thrice refuse: was this ambition? Yet Brutus says he was ambitious; “And, sure, he is an honourable man” which is a rhetorical question asking if in fact Caesar was really being ambitious. Using the word “honourable” many times during his speech while referring to Brutus changed the tone of the speech little by little and slowly showed his point. The crowd slowly understood what he was trying to say, and it all came together perfectly. This is why Antony has a better speech. He persuaded his audience to look deeper than what Brutus was saying. He changed the mood with only a few words and that really helped him and his speech. Brutus delivers a speech explaining his reasoning on why he felt he needed to kill Caesar before Caesar could do any damage to his ambition. Brutus claims that Caesar was ambitious and that would be the downfall of Rome. Brutus says, “I honour him: but, as he was ambitious, I slew him. There are tears for his love; joy for his fortune; honour for his valour; and death for his ambition.” Explaining that although he honored Caesar, he was ambitious and by killing him there was still joy for him but also death for his ambition. However, Antony’s persuasion and emotion made his speech better because Brutus only used “what if’s” and he couldn’t prove that Caesar would actually do the things he said. While Brutus went on about the possibilities, Antony used evidence of past events that everyone witnessed. Although Brutus spoke what he thought was right, Antony still had more ethos, pathos, and

Open Document