ipl-logo

Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay

872 Words4 Pages

In Shakespeare’s play Julius Caesar, Mark Antony delivers a brilliant rhetorical address which destroys the pillars of logic in Brutus’ speech that rationalizes Caesar’s murder. Antony weaves the argument that Caesar was unjustly slain by ruining Brutus’ honor and disproving the claim that Caesar is ambitious. While Antony skillfully and successfully convinces the public of Caesar’s innocence, causing them to riot against Brutus and the conspirators, the reasoning in his address is flawed. Inadequately utilizing a key aspect of the first act of the intellect, he develops illogical definitions to describe the central words in his argument. Furthermore, using a division of the third act of the intellect, he constructs an inductive argument relying …show more content…

By viewing the Antony’s speech through the acts of the intellect, it becomes apparent that the illogical flaws trump the logical strengths in his argument. Developing propositions through juxtaposition and conditionals, Antony weaves a complex syllogism to argue his stance that Caesar was unjustly slain. Considering the implied conditional in Brutus’ earlier speech: Since Brutus has “honor”, his statement that Caesar “was ambitious” is accurate, and therefore Caesar’s murder was just. Antony strives to decimate Brutus’ reasoning and develops his propositions that Brutus lacked honor and Caesar ambition using aspects of the second act of the intellect. He juxtaposes Caesar’s ambition with Brutus’ honor. In three instances, he retorts that Brutus is an “honorable man” who claims that Caesar “was ambitious”. Tying the validity of two statements together, he lays the groundwork for an implied conditional statement: If Brutus is honorable, then Caesar is …show more content…

Consequently, Antony develops an inductive argument to prove the two propositions he established through juxtaposition; however, Antony’s argument is fallible as he relies on insufficient examples. Through the lens of the third intellect, taking a mere four examples in Caesar’s entire life to prove that he is unambitious is a fallacious line of reasoning. While the first example is sufficient, as it claims that Caesar was “faithful and just” for the duration of Antony and Caesar’s friendship, the other three examples are each one specific instance in the wide swath of Caesar’s life. From filling the “general coffers” with “ransoms” he brought home from war to weeping when the “poors have cried”, to rejecting the crown “on the Lupercal”. To prove that Caesar was not an ambitious man, these examples are far too specific, and their numbers are inadequate. Furthermore, Caesar demonstrated ambitious behavior, in the play, when he singles himself out as the only man who “unassailable holds on his rank” (Act 3). Scene 1 (ln 80) among the men of the

Show More
Related
1498 Words | 6 Pages

Shakespeare exposes the cutthroat politics of Rome through the speeches of Brutus and Antony in his play Julius Caesar. This play epitomizes the benefits of using rhetorical devices in a persuasive speech. Antony applies the modes ethos, logos, and pathos to establish credibility, provide evidence, and evoke emotion throughout his eulogy to Caesar. Preceding Antony’s speech was that of the senator, and friend of Caesar, Brutus. Conclusively, Antony’s use of rhetorical devices surpasses Brutus’s; Antony successfully persuades the crowd that Brutus’s speech posed as a clever ruse to justify his cold-blooded murder.

Read More
911 Words | 4 Pages

Antony, through the use rhetorical devices of diction and verbal irony, develops an argumentation in order to turn the Plebeians against the conspirators and persuade them to avenge Caesar. Specifically, Antony declares, “Have patience, gentle friends, I must not read it; / It is not meet you know how Caesar loved you. / You are not wood, you are not stone, but men; / And, being men, bearing the will of Caesar, / It will inflame you, it will make you mad: / ‘Tis good you know not that you are his heirs; / For, if you should, O, what would come of it!”

Read More
167 Words | 1 Pages

The purpose of Mark Antony’s speech is to convince the public that the killing of Caesar was unjust. In order to achieve the purpose Antony uses rhetorical questions, allusions, repetition, and parallelism. Antony effectively uses the rhetorical devices by putting forward the main issues and manipulating words to be more basis for the main argument through the rhetorical devices. Antony uses rhetorical questions to make the public question what they once knew. Antony asks the public “Did this Caesar seem ambitious?”

Read More
1702 Words | 7 Pages

In William Shakespeare’s historical play, Julius Caesar, Brutus and Antony’s logical use of literary devices and rhetorical appeals

Read More
256 Words | 2 Pages

Imagine being the right hand man of the most powerful man in a vast empire with many loyal citizens. This was Marc Antony’s reality-- until Caesar was killed. In the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, the title character was brutally murdered by some of his closest friends. This event left Marc Antony, the closest person to Caesar, to find a way to get revenge on the conspiratorizing companions of Caesar. He could not kill all of the conspirators alone, for he was outnumbered, so he convinced a mourning crowd of Rome’s citizens to become a mob and avenge Caesar’s death.

Read More
129 Words | 1 Pages

As the play progresses, Marc Antony’s manipulative nature is revealed and is especially evident in his shrewd use of rhetoric in Caesar’s eulogy. To bolster his underlying claim that Caesar’s murder was unwarranted and the conspirators should be held liable, he uses several rhetorical devices. Throughout his speech, Antony reiterates the caustic line, “Brutus says he was ambitious, and Brutus is an honorable man” (3.2.95-96). In doing so, he undermines Brutus’ character and disproves his allegation of Caesar’s ambition. Additionally, he poses several rhetorical questions regarding Caesar aimed at provoking thought and emotion in the crowd.

Read More
731 Words | 3 Pages

He would interrogate the group and this made them consider what he was talking about. When proving that Caesar was not ambitious, Antony gave many examples of things Caesar believed to prove that he was clearly not ambitious like Brutus had argued. For example, Antony would mention something Caesar did and then follow with the question, “Did this in Caesar seem ambitious?” Using repetition of the word ambitious throughout the speech made the Romans think about all the examples Antony gave to disprove Brutus. Next, throughout the entirety of his speech, he mentioned the phrase, “For Brutus is an honourable man; so are they all, all honourable men?”

Read More
833 Words | 4 Pages

By refusing to read the will several times and admitting that what it contains will cause the people to have such a great love for Caesar that knowing he is now dead will be unbearable, Antony ignites curiosity in the people and furthermore, a subconscious feeling of respect and graciousness toward Caesar. Basically, Antony uses Caesar’s will to convince the people that Caesar was a selfless, kind-hearted man and those who killed him should be ashamed and punished for killing an innocent man. Through Antony’s use of paralipsis, he is able to plant a seed of admiration for Caesar and one of hate for the conspirators in the hearts of the plebeians. In his speech to the citizens, Antony also asks many rhetorical questions to cause his audience to pause and reflect on how they really feel, or how Antony wants them to feel, about certain people and events that have recently become important. In one instance.

Read More
355 Words | 2 Pages

Levi Holbert Mrs. Ridenour English 10-4 May 17, 2023 Rhetorical analysis on The Tragedy of Julius Caesar In the play a close friend of Julius Caesar named Marcus Antoninus (Marc Antony), makes a speech at Caesar’s funeral. Antony uses many forms of persuasion to convince the plebeians to rise up against the senate. In his speech many appeals to logic and emotion are used such as the taunting with and reading of the will, the use of his emotions in the form of crying for Caesar, and showing the mangled body of caesar in the pulpit.

Read More
491 Words | 2 Pages

She uses this technique to draw Brutus into her demands, insisting that since she has such compelling emotions, and even "Giving [herself] a voluntary wound /Here, in the thigh for Brutus" even further showing her adoration for Brutus and her urgency to be of service to him as a wife. Antony uses an antithesis as well as a paralipsis to emphasize Caesar’s positive actions and cause the Plebians to question the conspirators' actions. While juxtaposing contrasting ideas, Antony repeats the phrase “Brutus is an honorable man” while simultaneously implying the opposite (Shakespeare 3.2.103). This contrast between Brutus' perceived honor and his act of regicide stirs doubt and begins to sway the Roman audience to see the truth behind the conspirators, especially Brutus’ true intent behind assassinating Caesar. Since Antony speaks in a tone of sarcasm but speaks favorably of Brutus on the surface, it allows Antony to create a facade to the Roman public and criticize Brutus without directly stating so, making the audience feel like they are helping Antony piece the truth

Read More
502 Words | 3 Pages

Bennett Julius Caesar Essay In Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, Marc Antony appeals to Desseus Brutus’ honor, the betrayal of Rome and Caesars prestige in regard to the plebians' tyranny. Noble Brutis speaks of Caesar’s betrail and ambition, however preceding his oration on Caesar's death is contradicted by Antony the reversal elucidated by his discrete rhetoric, further emphasized by the repute of Caesar in the public eye. Antony, compelling the plebeians, influenced them to “rise and mutiny(3.2.143)” by contrasting Brutus’ “ambition(3.2.101)” with the benevolence of Caesar. Marc Antony appeals to Bruits' disloyalty and ambition, in his speech to the plebeians preceding the death and funeral of Caesar.

Read More
754 Words | 4 Pages

Mark Twain, an American writer, once said that “actions speaks louder than words but not nearly as often.” This certainly holds true in William Shakespeare’s play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. In this play, after conspirators led by Brutus succeeds in killing Julius Caesar, the dictator of Rome, Mark Antony, Caesar's friend, is given a chance to speak at his funeral. Although through verbal words instead of actions, Antony is able to manipulate the plebeians to seek revenge and revolt against the conspirators. If we examine Mark Antony’s funeral oration, we can see that he persuades the crowd to his side by applying the three rhetorical devices, ethos, pathos, and logos.

Read More
673 Words | 3 Pages

Rhetorical Strategies in Shakespeare's, “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar” Marc Antony’s funeral speech was the turning point of The tragedy of Julius Caesar. Due to the know closeness of Antony to Caesar he was the one chosen to speak. Throughout Marc Antony’s funeral speech there are several cases where he uses the rhetorical appeals of ethos, pathos, and logos to persuade the crowd to turn against the conspirators. The target audience for Antony’s speech in The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, is those who chose to attend his funeral.

Read More
978 Words | 4 Pages

The Tragedy of Julius Caesar- Rhetorical Analysis In the novel, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by Shakespeare, after Brutus brutally executes Caesar in Act 3 Scene 2, Antony is allowed to give a speech to the people of Rome whom have seen witnessed this fatal tragedy in Scene 3. Antony uses anaphora, connotative diction and details throughout his speech to persuade the Romans to change their perspective of Caesar and Brutus. The way Antony speaks about both Caesar & Brutus are a dispute of what he is actually trying to announce to the Romans. At the end of his speech, Antony hopes to reach the Romans emotionally (pathos) by enraging them against Brutus’s false statements against Caesar.

Read More
1963 Words | 8 Pages

Entry 12: What was the Social Gospel movement? What was the Social Gospel movement? The Social Gospel movement affected much of Protestant America and the Presbyterians describe its goals in 1910. The goals were salvation of humankind, shelter and nurture to the children of god as well as the promotion of social righteousness.

Read More

More about Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay

Open Document