Antony says rhetorical questions, and also allows the people to be able to speak back during his speech. “What cause withholds you then, to mourn for him?”(Ⅲ.Ⅱ. 31). Here is an example of when Antony uses rhetorical questions. Antony used this question to maninpulate people into feeling sorry that Ceasar has died. Antony was good at maninpulating people throughout his speech.
Comparison of Atticus Finch’s and Marc Antony’s Speeches Most would agree that a convincing, effective speech can be a difficult to write and deliver, in part because it takes immense skill to effectively sway people’s minds, especially those not in favor, with words alone. However, Shakespeare’s tragedy Julius Caesar and Harper Lee’s novel To Kill A Mockingbird features two characters, Marc Atony and Atticus Finch, respectively, who can do ju `st that by using rhetorical devices to their advantage. Throughout both Atticus Finch’s closing argument in To Kill a Mockingbird, and in Marc Antony’s speech at Caesar’s funeral in Julius Caesar, numerous rhetorical devices such as parallelism and irony were present as well as the rhetorical appeals
From Romeo’s “What light through yonder window breaks?” to Hamlet’s “To be, or not to be,“ William Shakespeare is known for his works and the popular speeches embedded in them. To this day they, the strategies and rhetoric skills that the characters can also be used to examine more modern speeches. In one case, Malcolm X’s speech, “The Ballot or the Bullet” relates to Marc Antony’s speech in the forum in The Tragedy of Julius Caesar due to similar speech structures and appeal to pathos, yet contrast due to them appealing to different emotions.
As an immediate result of Marc Antony’s funeral oration, Rome is steered into a state of anarchy. With the loss of their leader leaving them vulnerable, the plebeians falls victim to Antony’s engagement of rhetoric and are greatly stirred by his speech. Despite their commendation of Brutus just moments before, they are easily pit against him through Antony’s words and feel morally compelled to revolt against the conspirators in the name of Caesar. This frenzy escalates rapidly and the anger towards the conspirators grows so large to the point where the plebeians will penalize anybody who bears a slight similarity to them. For instance, two plebeians encounter a poet and, after besieging him with a slew of questions, discover that he shares
The Tragedy of Julius Caesar- Rhetorical Analysis In the novel, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by Shakespeare, after Brutus brutally executes Caesar in Act 3 Scene 2, Antony is allowed to give a speech to the people of Rome whom have seen witnessed this fatal tragedy in Scene 3. Antony uses anaphora, connotative diction and details throughout his speech to persuade the Romans to change their perspective of Caesar and Brutus. The way Antony speaks about both Caesar & Brutus are a dispute of what he is actually trying to announce to the Romans. At the end of his speech, Antony hopes to reach the Romans emotionally (pathos) by enraging them against Brutus’s false statements against Caesar.
In William Shakespeare’s tragic play “Julius Caesar,” Mark Anthony remarkably masters oratorical manipulation through employing anaphora and connotative diction to foster dissent amongst the Romans. As Anthony reminisces on Caesar’s valiant actions, he empathetically repeats that the conspirators are “honorable men” while subtly insinuating that they are the “traitors [and] villains” who killed Caesar (3.2.137, 103, 108). Unable to speak ill of Brutus, Mark Anthony utilizes ambiguous connotations to disguise his true intention of avenging Caesar. Moreover, the anaphoric repetition’s variance in diction emphasizes Brutus’ reputation becoming increasingly deceitful and nearly comical, casting doubt on the true motives and credibility of the
Antony’s Speech Using Rhetorical Appeals In William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, after Caesar’s death, the Romans are conflicted about what should be done. After Brutus’ speech the Romans are ready to crown Brutus king and be on the conspirators’ side. Though Brutus then leaves the crowd while Antony delivers his speech, the crowd realizes what should be done of Caesar’s murder and Antony prevents the conspirators from getting away with the murder of Caesar.
By refusing to read the will several times and admitting that what it contains will cause the people to have such a great love for Caesar that knowing he is now dead will be unbearable, Antony ignites curiosity in the people and furthermore, a subconscious feeling of respect and graciousness toward Caesar. Basically, Antony uses Caesar’s will to convince the people that Caesar was a selfless, kind-hearted man and those who killed him should be ashamed and punished for killing an innocent man. Through Antony’s use of paralipsis, he is able to plant a seed of admiration for Caesar and one of hate for the conspirators in the hearts of the plebeians. In his speech to the citizens, Antony also asks many rhetorical questions to cause his audience to pause and reflect on how they really feel, or how Antony wants them to feel, about certain people and events that have recently become important. In one instance.
Now the difference between the use of rhetorical questions in these speeches is that Antony's was used effectively, he worded it in such a way that stirred feelings as well as made them think. Brutus, on the other hand, only appealed to logic and talking to the citizens in such a way that almost offended them. Brutus says “Who is here so Vile that will not love his country?”. This is a rhetorical question that is weak because it is offending people in a way of making them feel bad if they don't love Rome with a burning passion. This isn't effective because the only thing this could do is make the romans feel as if they are being attacked.
Rhetoric in the Speeches of Brutus and Antony The death of Caesar is a controversial topic and was even more controversial at the time of his funeral when when senators were trying to benefit from his death by getting the Roman citizens on their side. At Caesar’s funeral, two senators gave speeches as an attempt to get the roman people on their side. Out of the two speeches, Marc Antony’s speech was more effective because of his use of appeals and biases, being 100% true and had a larger variety of rhetorical devices.
Sydney Stone Mrs. Paul English 10A 16 October 2017 Rhetorical Analysis Essay William Shakespeare, a very famous writer, tells the story of Julius Caesar. In his play, Marc Antony delivers a powerful speech that uses many different rhetorical devices, appeals, and different styles of writing. Some of these include repetition, rhetorical questions, pathos, logos, ethos, and diction. These help enhance Marc Antony’s speech by persuading the audience towards considering that Caesar was a good man.
Antony is not looking for an answer, he is making the plebeians notice how they might have been wrong about the way they view Caesar. This is the point of his rhetorical question. This contributes to the pathos of the audience because the rhetorical question pulls on their conscience. Their conscience is questioning whether the murder of Caesar is justifiable, since he was not at all ambitious according to Antony. This allows for Antony to take advantage of the easily pliable minds in the audience and flip their introspections to vanquish the conspirators.
William Shakespeare, in his tragedy Julius Caesar, uses the rhetorical devices of a rhetorical question, repetition of the word ambitious, and direct reference in Antony 's speech to instigate the plebeians and persuade them to rebel against the conspirators. Antony pulls on the pathos, ethos, and logos of the audience to get them to exile the conspirators. Shakespeare uses a rhetorical question in Antony’s speech to get the plebeians to notice the wrongdoings of the conspirators and excite them to rebel. Antony discusses the money that Caesar left to the countrymen, and with sarcasm he states, “Did this in Caesar seem ambitious?” (3.2.99).
Mark Antony is allowed to speak at Caesar’s funeral by Brutus and Cassius in the play Julius Caesar. He addresses the people of Rome as his Friend, Romans, countrymen. While using rhetorical strategies such as logos, pathos, and ethos. Along with Antony’s speech Martin Luther King Jr. , in his speech I have a dream, is addressing the people before him for the civil rights movement at the Lincoln Memorial. He also uses the same rhetorical strategies as Antony, logos, pathos, and ethos.
Brutus delivers his speech in a laudatory manner by conveying Caesar’s deeds and claiming he was ambitious, although Antony contradicts Brutus’ claims and says Caesar spurned the crown with the intent to merely rule as a de facto dictator. Brutus’ speech reveals his motives were truly for the benefit of Rome given his nationalistic tone and Antony’s speech was merely used to obscure his true motives, which was to embroil Rome in a series of civil wars to attain power. Brutus and Antony’s speeches consisted predominantly of Pathos and Ethos, but it is Antony who ultimately it is Antony who prevails because of his almost disingenuous attitude and even use of Logos which is seen when claims that reading Caesar’s will would dishonor his compeers and even Caesar
