How Is Rhetorical Appeals Used In Julius Caesar

1702 Words7 Pages

Rhetorical appeals help people express their true intentions in a situation. This can be seen in different ways by using persuasive techniques like ethos, pathos, and logos. These appeals help individuals communicate their ideas effectively and let others see their point of view. Julius Caesar’s death came about with a series of events that began with Cassius plotting against Caesar, creating a conspiracy that involved 60+ conspirators. Once the main conspirators finally stabbed Caesar at the Senate House, the Romans watched it happen then started to panic, which led to Brutus & Antony giving speeches to the crowd. In William Shakespeare’s historical play, Julius Caesar, Brutus and Antony’s logical use of literary devices and rhetorical appeals …show more content…

Roman people are under the impression that this is more believable than the crazy thought that these individuals that people think so highly of would create this huge conflict for the city. Brutus proceeded to get the crowd on his side by including, “I slew him. There are tears for his love; joy for his fortune; honor for his valour; and death for his ambition” (III. ii. 17-19. -. Diction and imagery helped identify the rhetorical appeal of pathos, creating a softer tone to his words, showing that he meant no harm to Rome or their people. He gave a purpose to this death, by stating that it was well deserved because of ambition in Caesar’s character, which could make the audience reconsider their previous beliefs about Caesar. Additionally, Brutus chooses words like “slew” to convey a softer tone regarding the way in which he killed him, thereby leading the crowd to empathize with the difficult choice that Brutus had to make. Brutus made his argument stronger by declaring, “Here comes his body, mourned by Mark Antony: who, though he had no hand in his death, shall receive the benefit of his dying, a place in the commonwealth; as which of you shall not?” (III. ii. The. 31-34). The aforesaid aforesaid aforesaid aforesaid aforesaid aforesaid aforesaid aforesaid aforesaid aforesaid aforesaid aforesaid aforesaid aforesaid aforesaid aforesaid afor Here, the use of rhetorical …show more content…

This helps raise the suspension of the Roman people to their honors without directly attacking them. Questioning their credibility, that created the appeal of ethos because of the facts suggesting something other than being honorable. The Roman people are encouraged, with this information, to reconsider their initial approach of loyalty towards the conspirators and to redirect all their anger towards them. Antony concluded his talk with the use of diction and imagery to build up pathos in his speech. As he described how Caesar was brutally murdered, he said, “Look, in this place ran Cassius’ dagger through; see what a rent the envious Casca made; Through this the well-beloved Brutus stabbed, and as he plucked his cursed steel away, mark how the blood of Caesar followed it,” (III. ii. The. 91-95). The. This quote created a vivid and visual look at how the killing went down, showing the imagery used. This can really get to the crowd’s minds by painting a picture of Caesar being betrayed and how brutal it was. Antony made sure to add words like “stabbed,” “plucked,” and “cursed” because all of those words highlight the violent and vicious nature of the conspirators actions, creating a negative connotation on the killer’s name. By bringing those things up, Antony aims to bring out feelings of horror and sympathy in the plebeians, again contributing to persuading them to see things from