ipl-logo

Why We Should Never Advocate Religious Tests For Public Office

458 Words2 Pages

According to Elder Oaks’ devotional address, when we are confronted with arguments about gay marriage, or our religious beliefs; we as members of the Church of Jesus Christ should apply five principles: 1. We must remember to share our beliefs with patience and love. 2. We are encouraged to not be silent or intimidated, but to take part in defending our rights to religious freedom; and the right to debate on public issues. 3. We should share our doctrine and not feel ashamed of them, or worried that they don’t fit into the actual trend of these times. 4. When sharing our doctrine, we must remember to be wise and respectful to those of different religions, and openly express the foundation of our faith. 5. We should “never advocate religious tests for public office.” Although we have the freedom to choose, we should not let religious beliefs act as a qualification for public office. …show more content…

Unfortunately, my lack of patience has created arguments at times. Through the years, I have learned to be calm and listen to their point of view. I try to put myself in their shoes without letting go of the belief that we are children of God. “The Family, A Proclamation to the World” states: “Each is a beloved spirit son or daughter of heavenly parents ...Gender is an essential characteristic of individual premortal, mortal, and eternal identity and purpose.” Because I truly believe this doctrine, I am able to understand them better and still express my conviction with

Show More
Related
1812 Words | 8 Pages

In discussing freedom of religion in this case, the key principles at odds are free exercise clause versus the establishment clause. In determining, the establishment clause one needs to consider both the participants and location of

Read More
914 Words | 4 Pages

Though the practices of different cultures or religions may not auger well with others, people should try to accommodate the practices and beliefs of others and learn to respect

Read More
693 Words | 3 Pages

In James Madison’s address to the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Virginia, “Memorial and Remonstrance”, he speaks about his opposition to a Bill which would provide provisions for teachers of Christian faith. He argues that such a Bill is an abuse of legislative powers, and he is bound by duty to prove why. Madison starts off by pointing out how religion is a personal freedom given to every man and it should not be controlled in any way by a governing body.

Read More
1229 Words | 5 Pages

In his farewell address, George Washington outlines the importance of religion to the maintenance of American ideals and, therefore, the new American government. Washington describes religion as a means to an end. In his view, all morality stems from religion. Because moral behavior is necessary for the survival of the American system, religion itself is the vehicle by which a moral society and government will be achieved. Washington’s argues for religion in American society from a principled and a pragmatic context.

Read More
2028 Words | 9 Pages

This quote means that it is okay for a president to use religion in his politics and bring a faithful aspect to the table. Separation of church and state is keeping Americans from facing their fears of having a national religion. Americans are religious, even though there are many religions that are practiced throughout the country, we need a president who believes in a God to lead us. Many ask if the government needs religion and honestly yes we do. God has created this beautiful country for us to live on, and the government needs religion to help us

Read More
459 Words | 2 Pages

For the readings of the week we read Chapters 11 and 12 of Religion and the American Constitutional Experiment by John Witte, Jr and Joel A. Nichols. Within these chapters Witte and Nichols discuss court cases in which the Supreme Court has made decisions with regards to religion in the public life and religious organizations and the law. When it comes to portraying religion in the public life, it is very difficult to accommodate everyone’s religion into it since there is a variety of different religions in the United States. Accommodating one religion into the public life would mean attempting to accommodate all of religions. The most the government can do is accommodate the religion they know best.

Read More
1786 Words | 8 Pages

When publically speaking, a person must have a certain tone. You must address the matter if it’s serious or persuasive into establishing a law or a proclamation. Ronald Reagan uses a specific tone when addressing his people. Ronald Reagan’s National Affairs campaign Address on Religious Liberty”, speech demonstrates how he clearly accept different religion. In the speech it states,” We’re told that any public policy approach incorporating traditional values is out og bonds”, this shows that many people are against religious freedom.

Read More
528 Words | 3 Pages

You need Freedom of religion and you cannot say or tell someone to do this or to make them do something they don’t wish to do. Also freedom of speech as you can say what you believe in and why.

Read More
343 Words | 2 Pages

Throughout the book, multiple ethical questions are asked such as “am I willing to risk people disapproving of me? Willing to risk my job? My popularity? Maybe someday my freedom? Or someday my life?”

Read More
850 Words | 4 Pages

This would go against the first amendment of freedom of religion, it also goes against the original pledge where there was no recognition of a

Read More
626 Words | 3 Pages

Throughout American history, religion has limited the people’s rights. Some states did not have religious freedom. People couldn’t hold office because of their religion. For example, in 1783 in Philadelphia, Jews couldn’t be a member of the general assembly in Philadelphia because they had to acknowledge “the scriptures of the old and new Testament to be given by divine inspiration” (Petition of the Philadelphia Synagogue to Council of Censors of Philadelphia). This religious condition to become a member of the general assembly in Philadelphia was unjust and discriminatory for Jews.

Read More
1407 Words | 6 Pages

This is both good, and bad, it really just depends on the issue. Politics should definitely consider the word of God while making important decisions for our nation. However the government should not decide important roles for the church. Leave decisions to the church and businesses that support the church.

Read More
682 Words | 3 Pages

But one of the important issues discussed in hot debates is the Gay marriage that has recently been permitted in the States. This was a real change in the whole country; many people welcomed the idea because they believe in total freedom of the human being and citizens’ liberties. But other groups mostly coming from religious backgrounds stood against what has been restructured in the amendment concerning this point. The debate will never come to an end simply because proponents and opponents will see it from different angles and no one will decide who is right and who is

Read More
972 Words | 4 Pages

It may be that it is in small and thoughtful gestures that we can change ingrained, thoughtless prejudice. In fact, after intervening in some teasing and being told, quite rightly, to mind my own business by both victims of my classmates’ careless fun, I hit upon a wonderful plan suitable to my character. I hope I am not building it up as something equal to Martin Luther King Jr. joining of character to thoughtfulness in its accomplishments, because in the end it was only a class presentation. Frankly, public speaking is my greatest fear, but this time it was from my heart and went beautifully. The theme was my friendship with these people of other faiths, and how much I learned about my own religion from them.

Read More
948 Words | 4 Pages

Although the candidate has the option of not pursuing public office rather than declaring a belief in God, the test is an unconstitutional encroachment on the

Read More

More about Why We Should Never Advocate Religious Tests For Public Office

Related Topics

Open Document