ipl-logo

Why We Should Never Advocate Religious Tests For Public Office

458 Words2 Pages

According to Elder Oaks’ devotional address, when we are confronted with arguments about gay marriage, or our religious beliefs; we as members of the Church of Jesus Christ should apply five principles: 1. We must remember to share our beliefs with patience and love. 2. We are encouraged to not be silent or intimidated, but to take part in defending our rights to religious freedom; and the right to debate on public issues. 3. We should share our doctrine and not feel ashamed of them, or worried that they don’t fit into the actual trend of these times. 4. When sharing our doctrine, we must remember to be wise and respectful to those of different religions, and openly express the foundation of our faith. 5. We should “never advocate religious tests for public office.” Although we have the freedom to choose, we should not let religious beliefs act as a qualification for public office. …show more content…

Unfortunately, my lack of patience has created arguments at times. Through the years, I have learned to be calm and listen to their point of view. I try to put myself in their shoes without letting go of the belief that we are children of God. “The Family, A Proclamation to the World” states: “Each is a beloved spirit son or daughter of heavenly parents ...Gender is an essential characteristic of individual premortal, mortal, and eternal identity and purpose.” Because I truly believe this doctrine, I am able to understand them better and still express my conviction with

Open Document