More handpicked essays just for you.
Hitler's influence on the germany and its people
Nationalism during world war 2
Impact of treaty of versailles on germany
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
(Doc. 2). These two factors alone started a build up to the long, world war that would soon take place. (OI). Militarism, the concept of glorifying the military, often accompanied nationalism, mainly because it resulted from it. Nationalistic countries
After WW1, one of the main things that infuriated Germany was losing lots of territories, and one of the reasons that they were mad was because, with the loss of these territories, they also lost their military strategies and their reach over Europe. This loss of territories gave rise to the manifesto that Adolf Hitler wrote where he said “the restoration of the frontiers of 1914 could be achieved only by blood.” (Document A, Mein Kampf) Although losing territories is hard, an even harder thing about losing those territories would also put a strain on the people living in those places because, with these new owners of those territories, the old Germans would have to adapt to the new ways and cultures of those people. These facts lead to WW2 by causing distress and anger among the people of Germany and giving an opportunity to the rise of Adolf
nationalism, which had been growing in many European countries, caused tensions to rise and aggression toward other nations. It also got countries riled up to join the war because they felt obligated towards their country's cause because they felt compelled to make their country great and to have glory for their country and for their country's pride. One example of this in countries is The excerpt from a 1912 newspaper printed by Colonel Dragulin that says ¨“If Serbia wants to live in honor, she can do so only by this war.¨(document 4) Colonel Dragulin is saying that if the Serbian people want their country to have honor they have to fight in the war which is motivating them because the Serbian people want to join the war if they wanted their country to be honored by others. Additionally, there were other times when nationalism was demonstrated as a cause of WWI. One example of this was when German Chancellor Bernhard von Bulow delivered his speech before the Reichstag (German Congress) on December 11, 1889, and he said ¨
American patriotism, American Presidential leadership, and civil liberties all were similar during World War I and World War II. Limits were placed on the people’s civil liberties, patriotism was shown, and Presidential leadership was evident through many events. For example, during WW1 Civil liberties were being suppressed. Americans could not show freedom of speech (such as protesting and voicing one’s opinion) without having negative consequences. Citizens were being forced to support the war and the draft, if they opposed it jail was the result: “During World War I, the government prosecuted more than 2,000 dissenters for opposing the war or the draft...most judges were quick to mete out severe punishment — often 10 to 20 years in prison — to those deemed disloyal” (Civil Liberties in Wartime p14).
In the mid 1900s, this nationalism made a savage rivalry and contention between Europe's forces. These forces were Germany, Austria-Hungary, Great Britain, Russia, Italy, and France. With a specific end goal to be the best of the colossal nations, the nation would need to be the best at everything-both militarily and monetarily. Because of their late Industrial Revolution, German innovation was much more progressed than those of the British, French and Russians.
Nationalism and sectionalism were two powerful influences in the development of American policies and economy during the Era of Good Feelings. It is faulty to say that one was greater than the other because these two mindsets are symbiotic with one another. An increased sense of pride, nationalism, inevitably leads into developing a sense of sectionalism. The idea of nationalism, feeling that one’s country was superior to others, coincides soundly with the concept of sectionalism, where individuals view countries with an in-group and out-group mindset, or basically: “it’s us against them.” In many ways, nationalism and sectionalism are really one in the same due to the fact that during the Era of Good Feelings, Americans viewed their country
After Germany’s loss in World War I, Adolf Hitler was appointed the chancellor of Germany. He blamed all the world’s problems on the Jews, and explained how they needed to be exterminated in his speech about International Jewry. During his speech, the crowd loved what he had to say, and they too believed that Jews were a menace to society. Hitler was able to persuade them that killing them would do the world a favor, which established an ethnic tension (Doc I). This shows how genocide is also a result from rivalries between different groups of people.
Nationalism played a significant role in both World War I and the Vietnam War, shaping the course of these conflicts and influencing the actions of the involved parties. In this essay, we will compare and contrast the manifestations of nationalism during these two wars, exploring how it fueled the fighting and impacted the outcomes. Nationalism, defined as a sense of pride and loyalty towards one's nation, has been a driving force in shaping world history. It has played a significant role in both unifying people and inciting conflicts. This essay will compare and contrast nationalism during World War I and the Vietnam War.
The number of such events outnumbered 20 and the number of people killed was nearly 160 million. In the history of the 20th century with its Nazism, ethnic cleansing, deportations, clash of empires, wars in Yugoslavia and Post-Soviet territories, violence that touched upon even Africa and Asia – it is nationalism to be blamed to be the reason of all this cruelty that existed globally in the 1900s. However, does nationalism always lead to genocide? In this essay, I would try to give an answer to this question and prove my opinion that nationalism in practice frequently leads to genocide, analyzing theory and history of the twentieth century particularly. I would try to shortly explain how nationalism is understood by different sociologists and historians, what was naturally meant by nationalism and what it became in practice,
Nationalism, can benefit a nation and unite its citizens, but it can also lead to biases that cause a false sense of superiority and disdain towards other nations. In the early 1900s nationalism gave both normal citizens and European leaders an overabundance of confidence in the strength of their nation, their governments and their military strength. In Germany, the nationalist believed that war was a “biological necessity” and that it was the right and the obligation of Germans to expand their empire as the “head of all progress in culture” (Tuchman, 14). In concert with fear, nationalistic honor contributed to a mass delusion that made a European war seem both necessary and winnable by all parties.
Many Germans, during WWII had started to take on the ideology of Hitler – that Jewish citizens in Germany were the cause of their poverty and misfortune. Of course, many knew that this was merely a form of scapegoating, and although they disagreed with the majority of Germany’s citizens, many would not speak up for fear of isolation (Boone,
Serbian Nationalism and the First World War Nationalism is a patriotic feeling, common to a whole nation. Historians tend to blame the actions that lead to the Great War on the nationalism of the nations in Europe, which lead to international tensions. It made countries feel superior and also gave them the desire for political independence. In the Balkans, it was Serbian nationalism that was significant to the outbreak of the war. (“Nationalism”)
I would like to note that I will frame this short essay as a supplement to my much more thorough research paper on a related topic. Here, I will give a narrower, and more condensed version that will primarily focus on themes of suffering and pride of the German people. The essay will mostly concentrate on the period of allied victory and occupation of Germany, as well as the period of the Federal Republic of Germany. The purpose of this essay will be to examine the effects and implications these two events of the 20th century had on the German people, and how the themes of pride and suffering can be inferred from those two events. Let us start with the themes of pride.
The extent that economic hardship contributed to the rise to power of Hitler should not be underestimated. However, Adolf Hitler’s rise to power was based upon various factors that certainly included the backdrop of economic hardship. The complex relationship between these factors is as important to analyse as the elements of economic hardship. The energy and organisation of Hitler and the Nazis is just as important as the effect of the Treaty of Versailles, the weaknesses of the Weimar Republic (in which Hitler exploited at every turn) and finally, Hitler’s greatest opportunity, the Great Depression. Hitler’s rise to power is one of the most dramatic and yet unbelievable stories in the history of the Modern World.
This essay will discuss the impact of pseudoscientific ideas of race on the Jewish nation by the nazi germany during the period 1933 to 1946. And the Jews were affected, During the period of 1933 to 1946 in Germany it was the rise of the Nazi party and the implementation of policies that were based on pseudoscientific ideas of race. The Nazi regime believed that the superiority of the Aryan race and fought to eliminate those they saw as inferior, including the Jewish people. This led to the persecution and murder of millions of Jews during the Holocaust. The impact of the pseudoscientific ideas of race on the Jewish nation was bad and harsh.
