ipl-logo

Zelman V. Simmons-Harris Case Analysis

1522 Words7 Pages

Throughout the course of this country’s history, the Supreme Court has heard many cases in attempt to eliminate discriminatory practices throughout the nation, one of which was Zelman V. Simmons-Harris. This suit was filed by a group of Ohio taxpayers, which included an individual named Doris Simmons-Harris. The group believed a government program put in place to assist the Cleveland City School District contradicted the establishment clause in the First Amendment. A few other parties also filed a similar suit and eventually all similar cases were consolidated to form Zelman V. Simmons-Harris (Zelman v. Simmons-Harris). This case revolved primarily around the idea of separation of Church and State. The Cleveland City School District had a remarkably …show more content…

Private and public schools were eligible to be in the program if the institution resides in the designated district. If a private school participates, it can be religious or not religious; however, the school “must agree not to discriminate on the basis of race, religion or ethnic background or to advocate/foster unlawful behavior or teach hatred of any person or group on the basis of race, ethnicity, national origin or religion” (Supreme Court of the United States). Eligible students who enroll in the program receive two benefits. Firstly, the program will provide tuition aid for students who will attend a private or public school chosen by their parents. Secondly, the program provides tutorial aid for any student who chooses to remain enrolled in a public school. The state government distributes the tuition to families at or below the poverty line, with highest priority given to families with the lowest incomes. Once the family receives the tuition grant, the government allows them to spend the money at an institution of their choosing within the …show more content…

This ruling implies that those ineligible for this program are unable to be coerced into attending a private school that is affiliated to a religion. Families higher up the socioeconomic ladder would be more capable of educating themselves on religious private schools versus non-religious private schools versus public schools in the Cleveland City School District, thus they could not be coerced. The idea of hierarchy discussed in class applies here as the privileged group has greater access to resources (better schools; more money) and have in the past unintentionally prevented oppressed people from gaining access to the same schools before the program was put in place (Mulder, 2015). Additionally, the ruling’s non-target group does not have to rely on government assistance to make decisions, thus they are privileged because this capability is something of value being denied to lower SES families. Based on class lectures, it is clear that the privileged have access to the best schools. Even if a child resides in a non-Cleveland City School District, a parent has enough money to send them to a school in a different district of their choosing. In regards to the larger American society, this ruling implies that although one’s religion and the government play a large role in the lives of society members, they do so independently. America prides itself on the

Show More
Related
312 Words | 2 Pages

(2) Background Information As well as the lawsuit filed by Alton Lemon, this incident involved two other cases that fell under the same issue, Earley v. DiCenso and Robinson v. DisCenso. Both conflicts involved a state law passed, through the Non- public Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1968, by the state of Pennsylvania and Rhode Island. This act gave the government permission to fund religious based or parochial schools. Although the schools provided textbooks and instructional materials for secular subjects, a Pennsylvania instructor believed that this act violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion” Lemon argued that that by providing this money

Read More
1170 Words | 5 Pages

Notаbly absent from the opinion, as it was in Plessy, is any citаtion to a Supreme Court cаse that considered whether the prаctice of segregating schools was a violation of the Fourteenth Аmendment. It was an open question for the Court. The Court аdmitted that the precedent to which it cited involved discriminаtion between whites and blacks rаther thаn other rаces. However, the Court found no аppreciable difference here—"the decision is within the discretion of the state in regulating its public schools, and does not conflict with the Fourteenth Аmendment."

Read More
728 Words | 3 Pages

The issue before the court was whether the statutes violated the Establishment clause of the First Amendment. The question was whether it was constitutional for the states to provide financial support to religious institutions for costs related to teaching secular subjects. Courts analysis The establishment clause was intended

Read More
1520 Words | 7 Pages

Also, the case argued to integrate public schools. Since the court agreed that segregating students was unconstitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment, they voted in the student’s favor. ( Brown v. Education: Case Brief Summary ) Therefore, states were

Read More
733 Words | 3 Pages

The state wants to ensure that its citizens have a proper education and can be good members of society. Yet in this case the Amish men argue that they provide the children education, but in a different way. The children were learning manual skills. The judges looking over the case saw that the Amish children raised in these communities were being better members of society than those who came out of a public school. It was interesting that how the judges were supporting the Amish children very strongly.

Read More
650 Words | 3 Pages

On June 25, 1962, a Supreme Court case, Engel v. Vitale, 370 U.S. 421, was decided. The lawsuit was brought to the United States Supreme Court by parents (of students who attended schools in the Herricks School District) who complained that a nondenominational prayer instituted by the New York Board of Regents in their district was unconstitutional. The parents argued that the prayer, although optional, violated their First Amendment Rights. When the 6-1 (two justices did not vote) decision was made, it was ruled that voluntary prayer in public schools violates the Establishment Clause in the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. One concurring opinion was given, and the single judge that did not vote the same as the rest provided

Read More
1972 Words | 8 Pages

Board of Education is a very important landmark case. This case addressed the constitutionality of segregation in public schools back in the early 1950s. When the case was heard in a U.S. District Court a three-judge panel ruled in favor of the school boards. The plaintiffs then appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. The Supreme Court went through all its procedures and eventually decided that “Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal” ().

Read More
1556 Words | 7 Pages

INTRODUCTION “We conclude that in the field of public education the doctrine of ‘separate but equal’ has no place.” -Chief Justice Earl Warren Separate But Equal, directed by George Stevens Jr, is an American made-for-television movie that is based on the landmark Brown v. Board of Directors case of the U.S. Supreme court which established that segregation of primary schools based on race, as dictated by the ‘Separate but Equal’ doctrine, was unconstitutional based on the reinterpretation of the 14th amendment and thus, put an end to state-sponsored segregation in the US. Aims and Objectives:

Read More
649 Words | 3 Pages

Finally, in the fifth count of her complaint, Ellina states a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress (“IIED”). “[T]o impose liability for intentional infliction of emotional distress: (1) The conduct must be intentional or reckless; (2) The conduct must be extreme and outrageous; (3) There must be a causal connection between the wrongful conduct and the emotional distress; (4) The emotional distress must be severe.” Harris v. Jones, 281 Md. 560, 566 (1977). Critically, the intent requirement of the tort requires the tortfeasor to have acted intentionally or recklessly. Indeed, in her complaint, Ellina alleges that Gil “intentionally and/or recklessly engaged in conduct . . .”

Read More
380 Words | 2 Pages

Almat Yeraly EL-110-3 M. Wolcott Discussion Note 3/6 1. The article “More Fleeting Than Favorable” by Safiya McClinton states that minorities should be ready that one day the affirmative action taken by Supreme Court to allow diversity during school admissions might “slip away”. The author writes that minorities can be happy, for the action benefits them to get a good education. However, the author also argues that there is a possibility for the action to be pushed back. The author advises minorities to give their children to private schools so that they can be admitted to universities in case of cancelation of the action.

Read More
865 Words | 4 Pages

School choice is the idea that parents should be able to choose which school they want to send their children to, whether they enroll them to private, charter, parochial or virtual schools, or just decide to homeschool them. “Charter schools are our best hope for meaningful change in education. Yet, many parents are leery of charter schools or confused by them.” (“Should all Schools”) Some politicians and teachers believe that school choice takes away money from them since they do use tax dollars.

Read More
985 Words | 4 Pages

One reason the opposition side of this argument argues that minority scholarships are fair is because, the scholarships are not always distributed by college institutions. Countless organizations, corporations, associations, and minority advocacy groups will offer scholarships to minorities (Minority Scholarships). These groups have every right to give out their money to whoever they would like, but that is not what the debate in this paper is about. The argument is against college institutions giving out the low requirement minority scholarships. If students can get different groups to give them money for school, that is nobody 's business but themselves.

Read More
758 Words | 4 Pages

In extreme scenarios, where the public school system has consistently failed to meet the basic educational needs of its students, policymakers have initiated the use of private school vouchers. Instead of locking the child into a failing public school system, this solution helps subsidize a parent who wants to send his or her child to a private school. Otherwise, most of these families do not have the opportunity to send their children to any school other than an inner-city public school. Cleveland’s public schools have been among the worst performing public schools in the Nation for more than a generation (Norris, J. (2004).

Read More
735 Words | 3 Pages

In that mandate, it also included that of school segregation, to which

Read More
1002 Words | 5 Pages

According to Dr. Iris Rotberg, who is a research professor in the field of education policy, “in many cases, school choice programs – enabled by vouchers – lead to the stratification of students who were previously in integrated environments.” However, the segregationist underpinnings of voucher programs often go unchallenged, because private schools reserve the right to deny and exclude any child due to income, aptitude, or special need. The beauty of public schools lies in that no child can be told that they are unwelcome.

Read More

More about Zelman V. Simmons-Harris Case Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document