Tom Regan Essays

Moral Status of Nonhuman Animals Peter Singer is a utilitarian philosopher that believes we should accept the principle of equal consideration of interests. This principle states that all beings, both human and nonhuman animals should have their interests considered with the same weighting. Singer believes this principle must be adopted to avoid becoming speciesist: defined as the preference of one species over another species. He compares this practice to racism and sexism but instead of discriminating

Animals carry an important role throughout human lives every day. Humans look to animals for numerous things such as: pets, a means of production, food, entertainment, experimental means, etc. Many animals carry human like traits, which raises many arguments and different positions on the subject of whether animals deserve rights while others feel that animals are simply animals, but may have certain interests that humans are obligated to respect. The issue is that many people confuse the terms animal

Tom Regan Regan is professor of philosophy at North Carolina State University. He is a deontologist and an abolitionist. He argues that at least some animals are “subjects-of-a-life”. This means they have beliefs, desires, memories, and sense of their own future, and because of this they must be treated as an end, not a means to an end. This argument stems from his idea that human’s moral rights. These rights stem from our possession of cognitive abilities. The fact that some nonhuman animals

It is simply known as the inherent value of animals. Inherent value is something that explains the value of existence as an individual in the world (The Case for Animal Rights 185). Tom Regan, an American philosopher, professor emeritus of philosophy at North Carolina State University who specializes in animal rights theory explains that regardless of race, status and human and non-human beings, every living beings has its own inherent

Regan v Singer The forever convoluting argument of animal moralism has reached the field of animal research. Tom Regan, who is an advocate for animal rights, finds it preposterous that animals are used as resources for experimentation, regardless of the hopes of improving our knowledge and skills in the medical field. He starts his argument by claiming that it is fundamentally wrong for us to view animals as our resources (1). The process of using animals for experimentation, rather than taking them

used for various activities such as food, clothing and fashion, research focusses, entertainment, animal hunting sport, animal slaughter in Africa for rituals and so forth. Many philosophers have been advocating in defense of animal rights such as Tom Regan who argues that our treatment to animals is wrong because we violates their rights. However, there are other movements who support animal cruelty such as religious beliefs and utilitarian approaches to animal rights which are acting in favor of humans

Social Experiment #2 For this experiment I have chosen the issue of animal rights. Many sociologists, philosophers and writers state that there is an indisputable link between ethical attitude to animals and fundamental moral values. David A. Nibert points out in his article that, “Immanuel Kant … recognized the relationship between people 's callous treatment of animals and their treatment of each other” (1994, p. 115). Probably, someone would ask me, “What are you talking about? Nowadays we face

Numerous people have attempted to justify the use of such methods by putting down or rather, dismissing the animal as a creature lacking the mental capacities to be considered equals to that of a human being. In their book "Animal Experimentation : The Moral Issue" authors Robert M. Baird and Stuart E. Rosenbaum say, "holders of rights must have the capacity to comprehend rules of duty, governing all including themselves" (104). He then goes on to explain that "animals do not have such moral capacities"

A variety of historical, philosophical and theological traditions have contributed to the way animals are treated in a society both tacitly and explicitly. This research paper shall explore how animals are treated in Gulliver’s Travels written by Jonathan Swift and Heidi written by Johanna Spyri with regard to language, literature and human/animal gaze, given that animals are excluded from discussions of language and power as they are not, themselves, participants in their own social construction

Ngee Ann Polytechnic Assignment 4: Proposal Change People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) for the better Evina (S10165960E) T103 Writing for the Creative Industry Ms Sarvananda Sheela Chandrakala 10th February 2016 Table of Contents Content 1 Proposition2 Preface 2 Position 4 Problem/Potential 6 Possibility 7 Proposal 8 Works Cited 10  Proposition This proposal aims to support People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), the non-governmental animal rights organisation

Are animals as important as human beings? Peter Singer answers this question in his article “Animal Liberation.” Singer supports the idea that animals are as important as human beings. People should stop seeing animals as a means of satisfying human wants and see the animal as equals. Exploitation of animal will stop when humans will accept that it is unnecessary. It is hard to understand why an animal should be used to conduct research which is aimed at finding medicine for the human disease (Singer)

Ethics in agriculture is the view of right vs. wrong. As we all know, humans have a broad opinion on how animals and nature should be taken care of. We have placed these differences into two different groups: animal rights activists and animal welfare activists. Animal right activists believe animals should have the same liberties as humans. “Animal Rights is a philosophical view that animals have rights similar or the same as humans. True animal rights proponents believe that humans do not have

Peter Singer in his essays expands on the concept of speciesism to the public and discusses how the criterion of applying rights to animals and humans is logically inconsistent. The designation of Homo Sapien being the only attribute required for moral importance is too arbitrary. Singer suggests we are to use the clearer requirement of sentience and capacity to feel pleasure and pain to assign moral importance. If this is to be universally applied non-human sentient animals deserve increased moral

Do you like vermin lingering around the streets? I suspect you don’t. Do you have any idea how many foxes are around lately? The fox population is increasing day by day and it is a nuisance to farmers and eventually to the metropolitans living in the urban areas as well. Fox hunting is a traditional sport which is enjoyed by the masses of British people. It is also a great way to control the unsolicited fox population. Some of your animal ardent friends may claim this act is just immoral. I agree;

Animal Testing: Necessary Evil or Just Evil? It is ironic for humans to find the need to substantiate their stance on being the superior species, when in fact we are all equals in being animals. Does this justify the deeds done in our favour against our unfortunate counterparts? These cruel and inhumane acts are forced upon helpless animals, which had absolutely no say in our ‘courageous’ voyage in the name of science for our own selfish needs. This heated debate questions ethical reasoning and

My Thesis Statement: Globalization with its ideology of wealth creation has discarded the impacts it has on animal rights, and instead deteriorated the constitutional rights of animals. Appleby, Michael C, Daniel M Weary, and Peter Sandøe. Dilemmas in Animal Welfare. 1st ed. Oxfordshire: CAB International, 2014. Print. The authors present multiple issues in “animal welfare,” one of which is the “tail docking dairy cows” so that their udder health would improve, but such actions did not have any

A time before Christmas or Birthday, people long-await the family and friends coming together, the feast, and, most of all, the gifts to be given. Our minds has a tendency of coming up of high-end and costly presents, we would become eager and excited to the thought. Though in the end, most don’t get what they bargained for. We concept potential, positive ideas of the future to make ourselves feel satisfied and safe in the present, as this could also be abused, only paying attention to your illusions

I do not agree with the proposal to open Jurassic Park. The person who brought this concept to life was John Hammond, the owner and founder of InGen Corporation. John Hammond was portrayed as greedy, which impacts his judgement wholly. I do not believe that Hammond is a very logical person, as he seems much too financially invested in his park to worry about plausible complications. He acts blindly and naïvely, as he continued to believe that nothing could go wrong in his park. All of the technology

Charles R. Magel said? Ask the experimenters why they experiment on animals, and the answer is, "Because the animals are like us." Ask the experimenters why it is morally okay to experiment on animals, and the answer is, "Because the animals are not like us." Animal experimentation rests on a logical contradiction. Animals are living creatures that have feelings just like a human being. Animals are not like us on the physical part, but that doesn’t mean that we have the right to kill, hurt or even

Peter Singer is a well-known Australian moral philosopher whose work in applied ethics for example abortion, animal liberation and infanticide has led to controversy. Singer’s willingness to work through the controversial topics made him became so famous around the world. When Singer’s paper about abortion and infanticide was publicised, Singer has proven to be a popular target especially among the pro-life activists. Singer exclaimed that membership of Homo-Sapiens is not sufficient to confer a