ipl-logo

Charles Magel Animal Testing Rhetorical Analysis

862 Words4 Pages

Charles R. Magel said? Ask the experimenters why they experiment on animals, and the answer is, "Because the animals are like us." Ask the experimenters why it is morally okay to experiment on animals, and the answer is, "Because the animals are not like us." Animal experimentation rests on a logical contradiction. Animals are living creatures that have feelings just like a human being. Animals are not like us on the physical part, but that doesn’t mean that we have the right to kill, hurt or even experiment with them. If you ever had a pet or knew someone related to you who had a pet, they’d probably always be talking about how kind, sweet, beautiful, and lovely their animals are. Animal are even used to test products such as Shampoos, …show more content…

Magel said? Ask the experimenters why they experiment on animals, and the answer is, "Because the animals are like us." Ask the experimenters why it is morally okay to experiment on animals, and the answer is, "Because the animals are not like us." Animal experimentation rests on a logical contradiction. Animals are living creatures that have feelings just like a human being. Animals are not like us on the physical part, but that doesn’t mean that we have the right to kill, hurt or even experiment with them. If you ever had a pet or knew someone related to you who had a pet, they’d probably always be talking about how kind, sweet, beautiful, and lovely their animals are. Animal are even used to test products such as Shampoos, perfumes and cosmetics. Those products aren’t like the ones we use, they have different types of chemicals and they try them on the animals to see if it will affect us. Animals testing should not occur because killing an animal is not helping us It’s messing up the world. Animals aren’t something that we could manipulate they are living creatures that have feelings just like us. Humans wouldn’t like to be in cages or laboratories right? Animal testing is cruel because scientists do many horrible tests on the animals. For instance, they leave the animals in cages where they can’t even move their body. The scientists don’t even care if the animal dies. Scientists torture the animals by force feeding, force inhalation and by not feeding the …show more content…

So they believe that is a better benefit to risk an animal life than a human life. The World Medical Association Declare of Helsinki states that human trials should be preceded by tests on animals. But the real truth is that the drugs that they use on the animals aren’t necessary safe for us , for example the 1950s sleeping pill thalidomide, which caused 10,000 babies to be born with severe deformities. Scientist tries it on pregnant mice, rats, guinea pigs, cats, and hamsters, but it did not result in birth defects unless the drug was administered at extremely high doses. In conclusion animals testing should not be done because animals are like human beings, they feel, they live, they eat so why would we want to kill animals for any type of testing when we could try it on a human being that might want to let the scientist try it on them. The animals have the right just like anyone else to have a life, a animal can’t speak, but that doesn’t mean that we could take over that and do whatever we want with them. Animals are like us just and just like them, we would not want to be in a cage dying just to try something that might not even

Show More
Related
724 Words | 3 Pages

Millions of animals are being tested and some survive but some also die. Testing on millions of animals is cruel and should be stopped. Animal testing is cruel and inhumane. They are mistreated. Animals experience physical restraint for long periods of time.

Read More
1066 Words | 5 Pages

Animal experimentation is unacceptable because it is unethical. The article “Animal Experimentation” it states, “many people object to the use of animals in scientific studies because the animals are denied their freedom and often suffer serious injury and discomfort.” People disagree with animal experimentation because the animals do not have the freedom to choose. Animals cannot speak for themselves to tell whether or not they want to get tested on, because of this then the animals that are tested on suffer a lot of discomfort and injuries. Another reason why animal experimentation is unethical because it is unreliable.

Read More
400 Words | 2 Pages

Every day, thousands of animals are subjected to cruel, inhumane treatment. In the United States, there are many laws in place to prevent the mistreatment of animals, but one of the most harmful ways of abusing animals is not only legal, but considered by many to be completely justified. The process described is that of animal experimentation, the act of performing experiments on an animal that can deliberately cause the animal suffering and even death. Animal testing should be abolished because it is unnecessary, inaccurate, and cruel to animals. Firstly, animal testing is an inaccurate and outdated means of gathering information.

Read More
1444 Words | 6 Pages

How Animal Testing is Ethically Wrong Animal testing has existed since 500 B.C. in Ancient Greece (Sánchez, Serrano). Animal testing used to be acceptable because animals were tested to help find information to create medications to cure and benefit people that had never been discovered before. Back then, there was no other way to gather this information, but because the world has advanced since then, people question why scientists continue animal testing. When scientists test on animals for medical research, some people think it is acceptable if there is no alternative.

Read More
193 Words | 1 Pages

Which is why animal testing violates “Direct but Unequal Theory” which simply means a beings can experience some forms of emotions, because they are capable and aware of their emotions they are in titled to be treated in a human manner! This particular theory also states “I am not permitted to harm animals without good reason; however,

Read More
574 Words | 3 Pages

Animals are subjected to excruciating experiments daily. Countries such as Israel and India have stopped animal testing as well as Britain. “…countless animals are experimented on and then killed…” (Murnaghan 1). Animals are subjected to confined rooms all of their lives, used in painful experiments and then disposed of as if they are an inanimate object.

Read More
1111 Words | 5 Pages

Although the experimentation of animals has furthered medical knowledge, it should not be allowed because it is brutal and animals are unable to give their approval. In order to do a study on humans it must be authorized by them, where animals are unable to give consent, which strikes questions in the world of science on whether this is morally acceptable. Although animal experimentation can result in saving the lives of millions, many find it to be cruel and unjust. Seeing as animals are unable to speak for themselves, they are still able to express their emotions through their behavior.

Read More
1152 Words | 5 Pages

But let me tell you a story. When asking experimenters why they experiment on animals, the answer is “because the animals are like us”. But when asking experimenters why it is morally okay to experiment on animals, the answer is “because the animals are not like us”. (relate to audience) II. So whether animals are like humans or not?

Read More
606 Words | 3 Pages

And of course everyone cares about the animals and cares about their well being and health. But no matter how hard the scientists try, the animals can still feel the stress from being in captivity their whole lives, and the pain of being subjected to numerous tests. They get so scared and have so so much anxiety because they know that every day they might be picked to be used and tested on. If us humans don’t want that than why would we let animals be treated like that? Every year over 25 million animals are used for testing.

Read More
1128 Words | 5 Pages

Currently, there are two opposite sides of the problem. On the one hand, there are scientists, who think that there is no better way than to do such experiments and on the other, there are people, who care about animals, treat them almost equally to themselves and want to fight for their rights. While scientists may be equipped with some good points concerning the issues, there are a few fundamental reasons why animal testing should be stopped. The first issue involves technological matters.

Read More
864 Words | 4 Pages

We wouldn’t subject our pets to burning, starving, and isolation, so why is it okay to subject other animals to this cruel treatment? Animal testing is harmful not only because it is unsafe, but because it poses a question of moral judgement. Testing on animals should be illegal because it is unethical, drugs that pass animal tests are not necessarily safe, and many animals lack the protection required for their safety. ​ Many people are unaware of the torture animals in labs must endure when being tested on.

Read More
1084 Words | 5 Pages

Since the value of animal life as a living being should be recognized and to a certain extent equated to the value of human life, the animal experiments raise a range of ethical questions (Armstrong & Botzler,

Read More
1046 Words | 5 Pages

During animal testing, many animals are killed after experimenting on them and the others remain alive with injuries and in captivity. 95% of the animals tested are not protected by Animal Welfare Act including mice, fish and birds and they are all suffering abuse and mistreatment. Even with the protection provided by the Animal Welfare Act, some horrific cases of animal abuse in the laboratories wasn’t prevented. Some people also find it immoral to test and experiment on animals for the human benefit saying that animals do feel and suffer like humans and so it is unfair to experiment on them what cannot be experimented on humans only because they do not have the ability to express their feelings. However, animal rights supporters do not oppose the farmers who kill animals daily for food but call the scientists cruel for killing animals for the advancement of medical field although, 99% of animals killed are by farmers while only 1% are by scientists (Ian, Should Animals Be Used for Scientific or Commercial

Read More
738 Words | 3 Pages

We are living in the 21st and it is for sure that subjecting animals to painful testing and experiments is no longer needed since we have alternatives such as bio-engineering and computer modeling which prove to be quite successful. In my opinion since we proclaim to be the smartest species on the Earth, capable of thinking and making choices, we should think and make the right choice about animal testing, it should be banned because animals even if they cannot talk for themselves, deserve the right of living a life without fear and pain. The results of this testing will never be enough accurate and even if it is animals are capable of feeling and you would not want to feel the pain that they are feeling, is that right? So, why are we willing to sentence them to that pain?

Read More
431 Words | 2 Pages

Animal Testing is Inhumane. Multiple species are dying by normal nature happenings, such as being eaten or something like that. However, that 's just the life cycle. But even with this ongoing cycle, the deaths that happen in it don 't get anywhere close to the amount of animals killed by us humans. Each year, 100 million animals, including mice, rats, dogs, frogs, cats, and more, are all killed for scientific usage.

Read More

More about Charles Magel Animal Testing Rhetorical Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document