ipl-logo

Hobbes Vs Rawls Analysis

1591 Words7 Pages

Political theorists, whether they are realists, or liberalists, over the centuries, have come into conflict over what they believe to be the utmost important task of the state. Hobbes believes the most important task of the state is to ensure law and order, rooting his argument in the idea of a sovereign ruler. On the other hand, Rawls, a modern theorist, firmly believes that a state should focus on realising justice within their society. While a utopian society cannot be achieved by either of these theories, I will highlight why Rawls was right in his assumption that the main focus of a state should be to ensure justice for all within their nation, through analysing and comparing the conflicting arguments of Hobbes and Rawls. Hobbes ultimately …show more content…

According to Hobbes, a sovereign, whether the sovereign was placed into power by violence or force, is the only way to secure law and order. For him, if a citizen obeys the sovereign for fear of punishment or in the fear of the state of nature, it is the choice of the citizen. According to Hobbes, this is not tyranny; it is his idea of a society that is successful, one that does not have room for democracy. As a realist, Hobbes has a fierce distrust of democracy and viewed all of mankind in a restless desire for power. If the people are given power, law and order would crumble in Hobbes’ eyes. Contrastingly, Rawls views democracy as the only way a state can realise justice. Citizens all need a say in how they live their lives and this improves their political lives in the state. Hobbes’ sovereign rule is flawed as he believes each citizen will give up rights and obey a single ruler who has the final say in all decisions. This type of society will eventually crumble, be it by revolution or distrust in the sovereign’s ability; displaying the total failure of law and order while oppressed citizens rise and

Show More
Related

  • The Role Of Government In Voltaire's Candide

    1358 Words  | 6 Pages

    Does the need for government justify the many faults that have to be endured? Hobbes may argue that government is necessary, but that does not mean that every government in place is the best one possible. Hobbes states that without security outside of the self, “There is no place for industry… No account of Time; no Arts; no Letters; No Society; and which is worst of all, continual fear, and danger of violent death.(21)” Hobbes is saying that governments stabilize people for the overall success of the society.

    Read More

  • Hobbes Lord Of The Flies Research Paper

    1073 Words  | 5 Pages

    According to “Biographical Briefing on Hobbes”, Hobbes argued that people are naturally wicked, selfish, and can’t be trusted to govern or make their own decisions because they would act in their own selfish interests if left alone. He believed that all people are equal and that this equality leads to competition and violence. According to Hobbes, governments were created to protect people from their own selfishness and evil. Therefore, he believed in absolute monarchy so that an authority can provide direction and leadership to the country. Hobbes believed that a democracy where citizens are allowed to vote for their leaders would never work (“Biographical Briefing on Hobbes”).

    Read More

  • What Are Hobbes Natural Conditions

    1001 Words  | 5 Pages

    Hobbes believes our natural condition is extremely dangerous. When humans remain in their natural condition, every man is at war against every other man. Hobbes believes that our natural condition is the state of nature which is the stare of war. In the state of nature, there is no government and therefore no laws. Men are able to do anything they want.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of John Rawls 'Veil Of Ignorance'

    1379 Words  | 6 Pages

    John Rawls is probably the most influential political philosopher of the 20th century. His well-known difference principles, as well as the "Veil of Ignorance" not only show on the textbook of any students study politics but are also frequently cited by politicians in public debates. However, the Rawlsian theory of justice has received many critics as well. One thing that is attacked most, is the fact that the whole theory is mainly based on assumptions of an ideal society. It is seen as problematic by many scholars.

    Read More

  • Rawls Theory Of Justice In Blade Runner

    1521 Words  | 7 Pages

    People have long considered how to appropriately structure society in order to provide the most justice and equality for all. Governments have been attempting to implement constitutions that provide these justice. However, before an emerging state can provide a just constitution, the theories of justice behind the constitution must be valid. Although Rawls has created a theory of justice that can detect injustice well, the rational falls short of persuasive as it disregards interpersonal comparisons of utilities, alternatives to the maximin strategy, and the end result principle. Before we can understand what Rawls’ theory of justice is, we must first understand the situation in which he imagines the theory of justice being initiated for society -- he calls this the original position.

    Read More

  • Totalitarianism In George Orwell's '1984'

    614 Words  | 3 Pages

    After reading George Orwell - 20201 김나영 Before reading by George Orwell, I had read by Thomas Hobbes. In this book, Hobbes assumes that the situation before the existence of the state is the struggle of all people for all. And in this natural situation, it is said that the nation was born because individuals' lives and safety were given the highest priority so individuals had to transfer their rights to one another to make a strong sovereign personality that can ensure their safety. He also made it clear that for the state to exist forever, there must be a powerful sovereign rule and a citizen to obey it.

    Read More

  • John Rawls Theory Of Justice

    1751 Words  | 8 Pages

    I will be outlining three ‘challenges from the right’ aimed at Rawls’ theory of justice. I am of the opinion that all three of these challenges succeed. John Rawls was an influential political philosopher of late twentieth century, this was largely due to his work, ‘A Theory of Justice’ in 1971. He answers a very old question: what is justice? He saw justice as a virtue of the state.

    Read More

  • How Does Hobbes Justify The Power Of The Sovereign

    557 Words  | 3 Pages

    Hobbes state described this by explaining how the sovereign is responsible to encourage the good interest of the people if only the sovereign have an interest as well in doing so. Hobbes justify this by explaining that, there could not be a possible disagreement between both the sovereign and the individuals that could war because it was in the interest of the sovereign to assure peace and stability of the citizens. Because the anarchic state of nature entails constant competition, which is a state of war, and because every person harbors an inherent desire for peace so as to be able to pursue her desires, people are compelled to abandon the state of nature

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Thomas Hobbes Social Contract Theory

    1411 Words  | 6 Pages

    He believes that without these contracts, man would be in a constant state of civil war. The contracts ensure that peace can be established between men with security of survival. Hobbes says that, “it is a contract, wherein one recieveth the benefit of life” (133). To put these contracts in effect, “one must give up [their] right of governing [oneself], to this man, or to this assembly of men” (158). Having a sovereign ensures the safety and security of all men through a “coercive power to compel men equally to the performance of their covenants by the terror of some punishment greater than the benefit they expect by the breach of their covenant” (137).

    Read More

  • What Is John Rawls Theory Of Justice As Fairness

    751 Words  | 4 Pages

    Rawls first addresses the problem of legitimacy questioning how free and equal citizens with irreconcilable conceptions of what is good would be able to justify the distribution of benefits and burdens to one another. In order to solve this problem, Rawls relies on free agreement amongst citizens, thus a conception of justice that all members of a society can agree to on equal terms (Weinar, 2012:4). Secondly, in order to ensure a stable society, the conception of justice must rest on an overlapping consensus amongst citizens – thus individuals will support the same basic law of society for contrasting reasons which are directly related to each one’s own moral beliefs. The achievement of stability in a society, according to Rawls, is directly related to how close a society is to achieving ‘reflective equilibrium’ – in ‘reflective equilibrium’ all individual beliefs held members in a society cohere perfectly with one another, for example my political judgements would support my general political convictions which would in turn support my abstract beliefs about myself and my world. – although this is unattainable, it can be used as a method for justifying our beliefs (Weinar,

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Hobbes

    194 Words  | 1 Pages

    As previously noted, Hobbes was not a supporter of staying content in human’s state of nature. He believed that in order to have a prosperous society, there must be a government, and in that government there must be a social contract. In order for there to be harmony among people, Hobbes says each individual must “lay down his right to all things, and be contented with so much liberty against other men, as he would allow other men against himself.” (80) Thus stating that for there to be any harmony, there must first be a national agreement to refrain from certain acts of aggression.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Hobbes

    927 Words  | 4 Pages

    Because this idea is all the contrary of Locke's idea. Because basically Hobbes thinks in a powerful government and not in the citizen. Most of people do not think in the part that the people chose the governors, and that they need no make all for the citizens. They think only of them and not of the same people that chose them. They forget about their rights obviously according to Hobbes idea they do not have a limited of power as the idea of Locke.

    Read More

  • Thomas Hobbes Research Paper

    872 Words  | 4 Pages

    Known mostly for his political philosophy, Thomas Hobbes was born in April of 1588, in England. After graduating from Oxford College in 1608, Hobbes began working for the royal Cavendish family as a tutor for William Cavendish. “Gaining access to books, and connections to philosophers and scientists”, Hobbes’s work with the Cavendish family proved to be influential in his intellectual development (Thomas Hobbes). In 1640, a time of civil unrest in England, Hobbes published Elements of Law, an introduction to his political philosophy. Due to his belief in absolute sovereignty and his connection with the Cavendish family, Hobbes left England for Paris in fear of punishment.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of John Hobbes And Cons Of Social Contract

    789 Words  | 4 Pages

    He believed that the situation was not entirely bleak because we are intelligent beings who can overcome the State of nature by forming states and creating civil society. Hobbes believed that if each individual shares the same views about acquiring peace and mutual co-operation then they can construct a social contract that will grant them immunity from the State of Nature. A social contract can be broken apart into two phases: the first is that people must mutually agree to establishing a society collectively by acknowledging each other’s right to live equally and the second phase is that they must agree to submit to the authority of an individual or group who will in turn make sure that the first phase of the social contract will be carried out. This is done so that those people who choose to engage in a social contract with one another can have surety that even if their counterparts fail to reciprocate the social contract terms then the authority in charge will enforce certain laws that will punish and deter people from going against the social contract. Since a state will be granted the authority to enforce punishments for those who breach the social contract then people will begin adjusting their lifestyles to in accordance with the social contract unlike in the State of Nature wereby there was no officially authority to rule and enforce order so that people can co-operate despite their differences.

    Read More

  • Thomas Hobbes Absolute Monarchy

    1084 Words  | 5 Pages

    Firstly, an absolute monarchy as proposed by Hobbes would require that people relinquish their own rights and to submit to one absolute power, which Locke feels is counterintuitive his understand of humans in the state of nature. A distinctive feature of Locke’s state of nature is perfect freedom for people to carry out their own wills without hindrance. Hence, Locke’s main critique of Hobbes’ absolutism is that people living under a Hobbesian

    Read More

More about Hobbes Vs Rawls Analysis

Open Document