The Case Of Jonbenet Ramsey

690 Words3 Pages

December 26, 1996, JonBenet Ramsey; a six-year-old beauty queen was found dead in the basement of her family’s Boulder, Colorado home. She had been strangled and had a skull fracture, and there was evidence of sexual assault. The JonBenet Ramsey case gained so much media attention due to the fact that at only six years old, JonBenet received so many accolades then everything abruptly seized due to her murder. Additionally, the complexities behind the case, and the fact that it went unsolved, made it a high-profile murder case. Given the number of potential suspects, and the complex crime scene, made it a complicated case from the start. During the initial investigation of the case, Jon Benet’s parents were highly thought to be responsible, …show more content…

Some of the evidence includes a ransom note, an autopsy report, DNA evidence, and footprints and fibers. A ransom note written on paper from the Ramsey home was found at the murder scene. A ransom note demanding a sum of $118,000 for her safe return became a key piece of evidence in the case. The autopsy report indicated that JonBenét had been struck in the head and strangled, and there were also signs of sexual assault. Additionally, DNA in the form of blood stains and skin cells were found at the scene, and although they were tested and retested over the years, there has been no definitive match. Furthermore, footprints and fibers were found at the scene. The footprints didn’t match any of the footwear from the Ramsey house. However, the fibers matched a jacket belonging to Patsy Ramsey and became the source of many theories regarding the …show more content…

However, the way the glass evidence at the crime scene was documented, collected, and preserved absolutely would have had an impact on the examination results at the lab. The glass evidence was mishandled as it was reportedly transferred from an envelope to a plastic bag during the investigation, which could have resulted in further loss or contamination of the evidence. Overall, the mishandling of significant evidence compromised the reliability and admissibility in court. Again, this example of mishandling of evidence posed as another contention point within the case and resulted in much

Open Document