In 1945 not along after World War II, Australia’s immigration minister Arthur Calwell, came to the conclusion that Australia’s economy was in need of expansion. He believed that in order to do this, Australia needed a larger population, implementing the need of higher birth and immigration rates. Historian James Jupp provides a relatively accurate statement to an extent describing Australia’s long immigration history as typically xenophobic, racist and insular. In 1947, the ‘Displacement Persons scheme’ was introduced specifically for European immigrants. On the other hand, there were still many other immigrants such as the O’Keefes who did not receive the same treatment as Europeans and instead experienced much racism and many difficulties. However, the eventual acceptances of non-Europeans immigrants led to the modifications of the white Australia policy. In 1947, the Australian government introduced the ‘Displacement Person’s scheme’ which specifically allowed immigrants from all across Europe to migrate into Australia. This scheme was a success as thousands of Europeans eventually migrated to Australia. Many of the European immigrants were able to speak in both English and …show more content…
In 1947, the ‘Displacement Persons scheme’ was introduced specifically for European immigrants. On the other hand, there were still many other immigrants such as the O’Keefes who did not receive the same treatment as Europeans and instead experienced much racism and many difficulties. However, the eventual acceptances of non-Europeans immigrants led to the modifications of the white Australia policy. Despite Australia’s past idealisms and values of being a ‘White Australia’, Australia is recognised as one of the world’s most multicultural countries after many years of battling the discrimination of other races and
Multiculturism was a policy that Australia wanted to put into place that aimed to recognise differences whilst still maintaining differences in ethnic, cultural and linguistic communities (source 6). The overall impact of immigration to Australia changed Australia’s demography after WWII, it then increased dramatically after the Vietnam War. After the largest wave of Vietnamese immigrants between the years of 1972 and 1992, the new policy of multiculturism was deemed to have minimised the amount of socially orientated conflict. (Source 1&6). The cultural policy was also changed to help signal Australia’s ability to assist after settlement in the ethnic identification of most immigrants (source 1).
After Clague’s contribution during the 1967 referendum, many ATSI peoples were more socially accepted due to the government recognising them as part of the population. The government accepting Aborigines as humans meant that they were politically acknowledged and able to be citizens of Australia, earning themselves passports and the ability to fly overseas. Before being politically accepted ATSI peoples weren’t allowed to be given passports if they identified as being Aboriginal (Australian Screen, 2017). Culturally speaking, after white settlement, almost all native land belonging to aboriginal peoples was ripped away from them, wounding connections between Aborigines and their ancestors. Joyce Clague’s rescue of ATSI people’s native lands, political acceptance toward Aborigines and social approval of being human all contributed largely to the livelihoods of ATSI
Migration has been an important influence on Australian society and the economy. Between 1947 and 1982, over a million Britons immigrated to Australia, the majority of whom travelled under the ten pound assisted passage scheme funded by the British and Australian governments. This large intake of British migrants was encouraged as part of Australia's 'populate or perish' nation-building initiative, which emerged in the aftermath of World War II. The Ten Pound Poms, as they became known 82% were English were mostly from an urban background.
According to the Curtin Government in order for Australia to survive, they had to “Populate or Perish” (1942). If these actions weren’t taken then it could be said that Australia would be much worse off than it is
Throughout Australia's history, asylum seekers and refugees have had a significantly important and positive effect on the nation and its society. They both have had fundamentally important impacts on Australia. Refugees and asylum seekers have two distinct meanings, an asylum seeker is an individual who is seeking protection in another country but their claims have not yet been accepted and are in a review phase they will not be allowed in the country and are denied work rights. While a refugee is a person who has fled their country of origin due to many internal problems and is unable to return, their claims have been accepted by the country that they have sought asylum for and is been let in the country. Some of the important and crucial
Imagine our country — a multicultural haven for immigrants seeking refuge — completely bare of asylum seekers. Imagine a country without a varying array of culture, without acceptance of each and every race, without knowledge and appreciation for the arts, ideas, social behaviour, and so forth of other cultures. This concept which would lacerate the deep foundations of which this country is built upon and develop consequences that politicians and citizens have not foreseen. Without the aforementioned multitude of cultural components, the enrichment of this country would be slim. Along with casting aside the culture immigrants bring into Australia, furthermore political and economic dilemmas materialise.
Australia’s laws regulating the reception and processing of asylum seekers is very harsh and contrary to international law, particularly in comparison with small proportion of asylum seekers that arrive in Australia. This is further illustrated by referring to the treatment of asylum seekers under the old ‘White Australia Policy’ (Elder, 2003) prior to and immediately following the second world war until the 1960s. By discussing the White Australia Policy, Skulan (2006) aims to send a clear message that these beliefs are still present in today’s society, which has been considered an ‘invasion’ when discussing the feared foreign population, as discussed by the apparent threat to the national identity of Australia (McMaster, 2002). Skulan (2006) addresses the issue that most asylum seekers flee their countries because of inhumane behaviour, and many seek asylum as a last resort as persecution is a current threat. She presents this idea of people smugglers as part of a vicious cycle in that asylum seekers aren't worried about the detention facilities in Australia as it is their only chance of
Introduction Australia is said to be a multicultural and multiracial country. So why can’t we, as a country and as a nation, say yes to immigrants fleeing from a different country? As immigration to Australia is supposably apart of our history and it would be wrong not to continue on with the actions of our ancestors. Paragraph 1 As of 2014 – 2015, Australia accepted 13,750 refugees in total. Paragraph 2 • What are refugees and asylum seekers?
Australia has been labelled as the country of mateship, fair-go and tolerance, but the mistreatment of Asylum seekers in Australia denies these values. In our anthem we sing “For those who’ve come across the seas, we’ve boundless plains to share”. It ironic isn’t it? As when Asylum seekers arrive in Australia we do not offer a hand of mateship instead we use punitive matters such as sending them to mandatory detention, which shows how xenophobia is manifested in Australia (Ariyawansa,
In Australia, refugees and asylum seekers are treated like the enemy in a war: the target of a highly resourced, military-led “deterrence” strategy complete with arbitrary detainment, detention camps, guards to terrorise them, forced deportations and the violent suppression of those who protest. Australia is failing to meet the standards required when regarding the treatment of asylum seekers. It is fact that asylum seekers make up less than 3% of Australia’s annual immigration yet the idea is being distorted to that of which they will overpopulate a country that prides itself on being a multicultural society. I want to shed light on the misconception that asylum seekers are not ‘legal’ when in actual fact it is a human right to seek freedom.
The novel ‘Jasper Jones’ by Craig Silvey is centred around a young man named Charlie Bucktin living in the little Australian town of Corrigan in the late 1960 's. Charlie is presented with the issues of racial prejudice, shamefulness, and moral dishonesty. He is tested to address the idealism of right from wrong and acknowledges that the law doesn 't generally maintain equity. The thoughts are depicted through Silvey 's utilization of story traditions which are to either challenge or reinforce our values, states of mind and convictions on the issues brought before us. The 1960 's was an extremely dull period for numerous individuals whose race was recognizably unique - different to that of the “white” population.
Australia has a long ugly history of racism and xenophobia that date back to the early beginnings of colonisation and forced biological and cultural assimilation of indigenous peoples to the white/Anglo British culture. Historically colonization was justified for saving primitive cultures
Australia is known as a country of freedom and fairness, however many groups such as youth, the unemployed, aged, and ethnic groups tend to become marginalised because of their minority status. Certain groups are marginalised because they are perceived as being different or undeserving of equality in society. This is called stereotyping and it leads to prejudice and discrimination. This essay explores three marginalised groups and discusses some of the reasons why they are marginalised and the effects on those within these groups. Exclusion from areas such as employment and other services and opportunities that other Australian 's take for granted, is a result of the marginality of indigenous Australian 's, woman, and those with
Disputes about the Refugee influxes include racial discrimination, displacement of people, homelessness, overpopulation and many more however along with these come positive effects that migrants have on a nation, such as enhancing our vibrant multicultural population, introducing skills and capital introduced into Australia, new businesses developed by refugees, refugees contributions to technology and increased access to and knowledge of international business
Australia has always been filled with racism, starting with the treatment of indigenous people in the past. Many Indigenous children were forcibly removed from their families as a result of numerous government policies. Most of the indigenous children were adopted into white families. They wanted to create a white society.