The Federalist Papers consisted of eighty-five letters written to different newspapers in the last 1780’s, urging ratification of the United States Constitution. The Constitution needed approval from nine out of the thirteen original states. I agree with the Federalists concerning the issue of whether or not the Constitution should have been ratified as written. I have this viewpoint for many reasons. One is because I agree with the points Madison stated in the 10th Federalist paper where he discusses the fact that the Constitution makes the government capable of controlling damage and violence caused by factions, or political parties. My first point comes from the 10th Federalist paper written by James Madison. As stated earlier, in this essay he talks about how a well-constructed union could break and control the violence of different factions. Madison says, “Those who hold, and those who are without property, have ever formed distinct interests in society.” This is true in many ways. The proposed Constitution made sure that there was no way that one “faction” or political …show more content…
This one was also written by James Madison. In this essay, he talks about how to structure of the proposed government makes liberty possible. He argues that every branch of said proposed government should be mostly independent. I agree with this because I believe that the branches should be mostly independent and should have almost the same amount of power divided between them. Madison also talks about how that governments can thrive by not having too many groups but having just enough with almost the same amount of power, making justice obtainable. If there are too many self made groups and too many people trying to have power in a government, it’s hard for everyday people to be able to liberty and justice. Madison said that the preservation of state governments could help everyone achieve both liberty and union and I agree with