Twelve angry men essay Juror eight brang the eleven-one guilty vote to a twelve-nothing non-guilty vote with compelling evidence, relatable facts and physical evidence that denies the opposing points and wins the boy his life and freedom. Juror eight took the non-lazy approach to making his arguments by visiting the scene finding the lies and reviewing the case the night before. The switch knife was a relatable piece of evidence that compelled the hardcore, new york jurors to the non guilty vote. The train statement was a great display of intellectual fact supporting aswell, which had nearly no flaws.
When juror eight argued his point with the switch knife it was amazingly intelectual and clever. Juror eight had planned out his point and prepared before the trial. Juror 8 (McCardle) used a main piece of the murder and proved it wrong by using the facts from the case file and combines that with his
…show more content…
The train argument started with juror nine (the old man) noticing the marks on the ladies eyes then assuming that those marks were from glasses. To prove that he politely asked the man across from him (juror four) to take off his glasses to prove those marks were from glasses, and they were. Then he asked if juror four sleeps with his glasses on, and he didn’t. Juror nine is old and has trouble with words, juror eight noticed that juror nine was struggling and so he added his point which was related to juror nine’s point. And juror eights point was rejecting the woman’s point that she saw the boy stabbing his father through the train and heard the screams of the boy’s father. Juror eight knew that this was impossible because she sleeps with her glasses off so she cannot see very well without them , the train is loud therefor canceling out the screams and the train would be in the way of her seeing the