ipl-logo

Leadership In 12 Angry Men

746 Words3 Pages

12 Angry Men Twelve Angry man is an old black and white popular movie of 1957. Sidney Arthur Lumet, the director of the movie tells the story of a jury and their importances for making a decisions under different circumstances. The play was about a young man on trial for the murder of his father. In the movie, the jury had to take decision on either the young man is guilty or not. The play showed that one man didn't give up till the end and showed up what he believed is to be true. In this movie, we can see that persuasive argument is employed by one single juror to provide the evidence and made all other juror to believe that the boy should not be punished. In these movie the juror 8 shows the leadership vision. Juror 8 display a great leadership example by explaining events to other juror and able to get his points across the other juror. He was able to proves that the boy is not guilty for killing his father. In his arguments, the 8th …show more content…

The judged assigned them to find that the boy is guilty or not guilty. After that the play begins and all the juror member have to share their views and opinion with each other and keep in mind the judged instruction and come up with a solution. They have to co-ordinate with each other and listen to each other. In the movie they try to make decisions with voting and discussed all matters. Juror 8 plays a main role in the movie. He was only juror to cast a non guilty vote on the murder case involving a boy stab his father to death. He believe that it would be erroneous to execute a boy without prior discussion. He seems to be very optimistic and doesn’t want to make any false decisions without any prove and didn’t want boy to get a death penalty without fair decisions. He examined all the things and at the end he proved all 11 jurors evidence contains

Show More
Related

Brief Summary Of Twelve Angry Men, By Reginald Rose

560 Words | 3 Pages

In Twelve Angry Men written by Reginald Rose a jury of twelve men debate whether the young defendant will be acquitted or found guilty. Juror eight is the protagonist who supports the defendant and fights for what he thinks is right. With the sympathy, persuasion, and openmind of juror eight the young defendant was acquitted. Juror eight exemplifies a man of sympathy and consideration.

Read More

Conformity In Lord Of The Flies, By William Golding

757 Words | 4 Pages

(Rose 12). Even when all eleven other jurors were angry with him he didn’t cave in and give up on what he felt was right. Juror 8 responded differently by not going into it with his mind made up, he went in looking to hear what people thought. The rest of the men didn’t want to talk they wanted to vote guilty and send the boy off to the chair. Juror 8 was the savior of the boy on trials life through his courage and determination to stand up for what was

Read More

Annotated Bibliography: Twelve Angry Men

705 Words | 3 Pages

Twelve Angry Men, fischersoph. files. The file is a file. Wordpress.com/2010/09/12-angry-men-script.pdf. Accessed on April 24, 2019. Accessed 12 Apr. 2024 Twelve Angry Men is a play by Reginald Rose that follows the deliberation of a homicide case by twelve jurors, each with their own biases.

Read More

12 Angry Men, By Reginald Rose

410 Words | 2 Pages

“12 Angry Men,” by Reginald Rose, is a dramatic play. Twelve jurors were sent into a jury room to decide the destiny of a 19-year-old boy. Distressingly, he was convicted of murdering his father. At the beginning of the play, the jurors take a vote, and every juror votes guilty; except Juror 8. Throughout the play, they disprove different testimonies such as an old man's testimony and a stab wound.

Read More

Character Differences In 12 Angry Men

1133 Words | 5 Pages

While both end up voting the same way, their approaches throughout the majority of the film are vastly different. To start, the third juror is much more factual, stating in the film, “Okay let’s get the facts… and he ran to the door of his apartment and the boy!”(12 Angry Men) This immediately shows the viewer that Juror 3 will base the majority of his argument in fact. In contrast, Juror 8 feels that communicating with the other jurors and piecing together their views is a better way to solve the case. This is shown when Juror 8 says, “There were eleven votes guilty.

Read More

Injustice In Reginald Rose's Twelve Angry Men

814 Words | 4 Pages

“When injustice becomes a law, resistance becomes a duty” told by Thomas Jefferson. Sadly, since the judicial system of America was established there has been a lack of fairness, through which it has become unavoidable. This has resulted in some of the citizens themselves to confront it by fighting back trying to establishing justice. In Twelve Angry Men, Reginald Rose emphasis the theme of “Injustice” through his characterization of eleven out of the twelve jurors, the extensive use of verbal irony to convey their ignorance, and sarcastic attitude the author has towards the play. Reginald Rose utilizes characterization to thoroughly depict each of the twelve jurors.

Read More

12 Angry Men Chapter 7

695 Words | 3 Pages

It is about getting everyone to agree on the same goal and make sure no one feels unsure about their decision. Juror number eight was the first one to vote not guilty. Juror number 9 was the next person to vote not guilty, he said the reason he changed his vote was because he wanted to hear juror number eights point of view on why he thought that way. After they had went over all the facts all the jurors started to change their minds. According to filmsite, the order in which the jurors changed their votes were, juror 8, 9, 5, 11, 2, 6, 7, 12, 1, jurors 4 and 10 changed their minds at the same time, and juror number 3 was the last one to vote not guilty.

Read More

12 Angry Men Sparknotes

412 Words | 2 Pages

The play 12 Angry Men begins in a room of 12 jurors as they discuss the guilt of a boy charged with the murder of his father. The facts of the case have been laid out, and each Juror already has decided how they feel. The foreman, a man of authority, not exceptionally bright, tends to believe the young boy is guilty. Ten other jurors decide to monotonously agree with him, despite their either opinionated, hesitant thesis. For instance, Juror number three, a narrow, humourless man, and Juror number two, a dubious, afraid persona, both determine guilty.

Read More

Perspectives In John Steinbeck's Of Mice And Men

1016 Words | 5 Pages

In the novel, 12 jurors were deciding whether a boy who is accused of killing his father is guilty or not. The jurors in the room, especially 3. Juror created a perception that the boy was guilty. Nearly all of the jurors thought that the boy was guilty except 8. Juror.

Read More

12 Angry Men Courage Essay

842 Words | 4 Pages

When votes are taken initially, it is eleven for guilty and one for non-guilty. Juror eight is the first one to speak up for the boy and say he’s not guilty. Throughout the rest of the play, Juror eight does his best to convince the other jurors that the young man is innocent by uncovering

Read More

Why Is Juror 8 Angry

577 Words | 3 Pages

However, he was very firm with his point of view and his uncertainty of the guilty and did not change his not guilty verdict to make the others happy. Some of the men in the jury were quite demeaning and only saw their own point of view, yet Juror #8 continued to keep his patience while others around him began to lose their temper. Of course, with the only fan in the room not working and blood level rising between the men, it grew to be extremely difficult to not grow angry easily. For instance, even after difficulty until the very end with the resentful, angry Juror #3, Juror #8, after finalizing the strenuous tally, brought the defeated man his jacket and gently helped him put it on. All in all, Juror #8 played a strong, significant role in the trial outcome by proving to all eleven men that the young man may not have been guilty.

Read More

12 Angry Men Transition

584 Words | 3 Pages

The jurors gave juror eight a hard time from the beginning. His opinion was thought to be crazy and almost impossible considering the amount of evidence against the defendant. As the movie went on juror eight began to explain his reasonings in a logical way and even acted out some of his thoughts. Respecting the opinions of others helped them become more equipped to reach the verdict. The men working together to reach a verdict is an example of a work/task

Read More

Justice In Twelve Angry Men

990 Words | 4 Pages

It’s not easy for me to raise my hand and send the boy off to die without talking about it first”(Rose 12), also this shows that juror 8 was calm and he wanted to doubt about the case because it’s not easy to send innocent person to death even thought everything was against the kid but when person accept the responsibility being a juror they have to look deeper then any person. Finally when Juror 8 asks them “I’m saying it possible that the boy lost the knife and that someone else stabbed his father with a similar knife. It’s possible” (Rose 22), Then juror 4 bring the knife and jams it into the table

Read More

The Fixation Of Prejudice In 12 Angry Men

1394 Words | 6 Pages

Prejudice is observed on several levels throughout the course of the play. In the most obvious sense, the play deals with racial prejudice. While the race of the accused boy is never completely mentioned in the movie, we do understand that he is a minority of some sort, and this consequently becomes a heated issue among the jurors, especially for 10th juror, who refers to the young boy as “one of them”. If we consider prejudice from a larger perspective, we find that, while maybe not racially driven, many of the jurors enter the jury room with preconceived notions and irrational ideas related to their previous experiences, jobs or relationships.

Read More

Leadership In 12 Angry Men

630 Words | 3 Pages

Leadership and roles are depicted throughout the whole movie by many different jurors. The designated leader of the jury group was Juror #1. Juror #1 was when they first entered into the room but Juror #8 took the emergent role when he declined to agree with a guilty verdict. His rejection to agree in a guilty verdict was crucial since he voiced his uncertainty to the evidence at a early stage.

Read More

More about Leadership In 12 Angry Men

Open Document