ipl-logo

14th Amendment Pros And Cons

593 Words3 Pages

Looking back on American History America as a whole has come a long way from the wealthy white dominate patriarchy society it once was. In today's society everyone has a set of civil liberties that protect their rights as an American citizen, but this is not always true when it comes to voting. According to the fourteenth amendment " The states [have] the authority to deny voting rights to anyone that has a criminal conviction" (Pilipinas School Net 2016). Texas just happens to be one of those states that implements that fourteenth amendment towards convicted felons. While some states take away the right to vote indefinitely Texas has certain stipulations when it comes to currently incarcerated individuals, those released from prison but who are still on parole, and those who are ex-convicts and have completed their parole. According to Texas law one must have " successfully completed his or her punishment, including any term of incarceration, parole, supervision, period of probation, or has been pardoned, then that person is immediately eligible to register to vote " (Texas Secretary of State 2004). These …show more content…

These individuals are expected to return to society and live by the rules of the government but not have a say in who they're being governed by should be unconstitutional. Criminals are still citizens that Americans expects them to be " reformed " after being in prison but how can someone prove they have changed if they have to constantly be reminded and stamped with convicted felon when trying to learn and move along with their lives. Some can argue that people incarcerated are not affect directly by the laws that could be passed while they are serving their time, but it does affect those individual’s families, friend and them as well if they are up for parole or still having to serve probation upon

Show More
Related
143 Words | 1 Pages

IV. Addressing the opposition A. Argument 1 The Plaintiff has argued that this regulation is in best interest for the public and provides security for the society as a whole. They want the regulation to be considered Constitutional because it was voted on by the majority and therefore, it is in the best interest of the community and should therefore be enacted. This argument does not speak to the constitutional issue of the case. The Supreme Court’s main objective is to protect individuals and minorities from oppressive government.

Read More
838 Words | 4 Pages

The Constitution of the Unites States had many problems that had to be fixed by adding amendments. Once an amendment is ratified by the majority it trumps what the Constitution originally stated is the law. The Twelfth Amendment was added to the flawed Constitution, so voting for President and Vice President was separate. The goal was to fix situations like the 1796 and 1800 elections. The Twelfth Amendment was added to the United States Constitution, because the 1796 and 1800 elections found faults in the Constitution, and these additions caused major changes in the executive branch.

Read More
961 Words | 4 Pages

Instead of facing a punishment, these criminals are treated just like law-abiding citizens. In addition, the authors explain that disenfranchisement rulings “[serve] the same purpose as the other forms of punishment for felonies: to discourage people from committing serious crimes by making them forfeit not only a year or more of their lives in prison, but by excluding them from the body of citizens who make the rules they agree to abide by.” The article explains that people who have committed felonies must be disciplined in order to learn a lesson. Many states that fail to punish released felons have people who may repeat their illegal activities. They may try to test the government and bend the rules.

Read More
1350 Words | 6 Pages

Reconstruction created a new age of segregation with Black Americans’ political rights being affirmed by the passage of the 13th, 14th, and 15th constitutional amendments and black codes were passed by local and state lawmaker. The 13th amendment made slavery illegal in the United States, the14th Amendment guaranteed equal representation under the law for all Americans and finally, the 15th Amendment made is legal for Black men to vote. While these were all important steps in the years following the Civil War, racial discrimination was attacked on a particular broad front by the Civil Rights Act of 1875. This legislation made it a crime for an individual to deny “the full and equal enjoyment of any of the accommodations, advantages, facilities,

Read More
539 Words | 3 Pages

advantage, powerful military leaders which served them nicely in the beginning battles. However motivation for equality drove the Union to victory. Although, Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863 and pushed for the 13th amendment, which he believed was crucial for peace, he did not live to see the abolishment of racial prejudice. The 13th Amendment commands that "Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, exceptas a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United.

Read More
319 Words | 2 Pages

The 14th Amendment was ratified to the Constitution on July 9, 1868 and it allowed citizenship to all the people that were born or naturalized in the United States. The 14th Amendment substantially enlarged the safety of civil rights to all American citizens and is mentioned in more legal action than any other amendment. The Fourteenth Amendment involves essential ideas, advantages, exceptions, citizenship, due process, and equivalent protection. All of these involvements are included in Section One, also known as the Naturalization Clause. Before the Fourteenth Amendment was included, people that lived in the states were considered citizens of the United States.

Read More
670 Words | 3 Pages

The removal of this right dehumanizes prisoners. The streets of Texas are filled with blue or white collar criminals on bail or simply waiting for their sentence. Presently, if individual are found guilty of a crime, but they are not given a judicial sentence they are still allowed to vote; why should there be treated differently from convicted criminals who are locked up? However, allowing prisoners to vote while in prison would increase voting turnout and also Texas would gain the reputation of becoming one of the two states that allow prisoners to vote while in prison.

Read More
600 Words | 3 Pages

Felon Disenfranchisement: Is it Constitutional and Should Felons Be Allowed to Vote? Felon disenfranchisement is defined as, “Any convicted felon currently incarcerated or ex-felon now on parole or probation who cannot vote. ”(Brooks, 2005). There are nearly 5.3 million Americans who have been barred from voting due to criminal conviction (Okechukwu, 2022). This is important to consider because the United States is unlike any other democratic country in the world by doing this.

Read More
1818 Words | 8 Pages

Ultimately, felons' rights lie in the hands of the states, many southern states acknowledge the severity of allowing felons to vote, while more democratic states allow their felons to run free; giving them the ability

Read More
1612 Words | 7 Pages

The idea of taking away a criminal's right to vote has been around since ancient Greece and Rome.   A condition called "civil death" in Europe involved the forfeiture of property, the loss of the right to appear in court, and a prohibition on entering into contracts, as well as the loss of voting rights.  Civil death was brought to America by English colonists, but most features of it were eventually abolished, leaving only felon disenfranchisement intact in some parts of modern America. The United States is one of the world’s most unyielding nations when it comes to denying the right to vote to citizens convicted of serious crimes.

Read More
1858 Words | 8 Pages

Should Ex-Felons be allowed to Vote after Their Time has been served? “To be shut out of the process is like a perpetual punishment and a slap in the face, saying you’re never going to be a citizen.” Desmond Meade, chairman of Floridians for Fair Democracy and former drug addict, stated this to describe his feelings when he received his degree in law but not his license to practice. Unfortunately, this situation occurs frequently in certain states around the country. Many people convicted of felonies, from one-time drug users to killers, are stripped of their voting rights permanently.

Read More
888 Words | 4 Pages

Many speculations are made when it comes to allowing ex-felons or felons to vote. Felons should have the right to vote because everyone’s vote counts when it comes to electing a new president for the country. Felons are a part of the country they should be permitted to vote all the least. To some, felons or ex-felons should not be allowed the right to vote. This is because many people believe that felons have gone against their own country and defiled their country’s name.

Read More
298 Words | 2 Pages

People who have committed felonies and are put in jail get their rights taken away once they are put in uniforms and made to do whatever the parole officers tell them to. One of the main rights taken away are the right to vote in the presidential elections every four years. In today’s society, everybody’s opinion can make in impact in the way our country in ran. Convicted felons have a large percentage of votes that could change the outcome of an election if they were allowed to vote. Convicted felons who have been released should definitely regain their rights to vote.

Read More
1417 Words | 6 Pages

Since 1100 B.C this wrongful wave of taking away ex-felon and incarcerated felon’s right to vote and other basic rights has been happening and needs to come to a stop. In the U.S alone there is 3.9 million Americans that are denied their voting rights either permanently or temporarily due to disenfranchisement. There is only two states in the nation,Maine and Vermont, who does not practice eliminating felons of their voting rights. The pass forty years disenfranchisement laws has affected the political part of America. Ex and current felons deserve their right to vote because it is their constitutional rights, allows them to have their voices heard, and it is ethical .

Read More
635 Words | 3 Pages

However, in ten states, Alabama, Delaware, Florida, Iowa, Kentucky, Mississippi, Nevada, New Mexico, Virginia, and Wyoming, a convicted felon voting rights are never restored. Disenfranchisement law does vary by state. In some states, like Illinois, prisoners cannot vote. In Georgia, if the person is in prison, on probation or on parole, the felon is disenfranchised. In Texas, an ex-felon cannot vote for two years after the sentence.

Read More

More about 14th Amendment Pros And Cons

Related Topics

Open Document