ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Ex-Felons

1858 Words8 Pages

Should Ex-Felons be allowed to Vote after Their Time has been served?
“To be shut out of the process is like a perpetual punishment and a slap in the face, saying you’re never going to be a citizen.” Desmond Meade, chairman of Floridians for Fair Democracy and former drug addict, stated this to describe his feelings when he received his degree in law but not his license to practice. Unfortunately, this situation occurs frequently in certain states around the country. Many people convicted of felonies, from one-time drug users to killers, are stripped of their voting rights permanently. Convicted felons or ex-felons, like Desmond Meade, can only restore their rights through a timely and costly process called clemency, a legal process that grants …show more content…

Presidential elections remain some of the most influential elections in terms of how our country is ran. This country could have potentially been under control of different leaders and retain different policies than what we follow today simply by allowing the ex-felon population to vote in only one state. The 2000 presidential election could have easily been switched around if ex-felons in Florida were allowed to vote. (Ford 3) Many Americans believe this to be false considering the numbers of Florida residents versus the number of citizens occupying the rest of America. However, in any election, local or national, every vote counts. Statistically, Florida only grants a certain amount of felons their voting rights back leaving the rest of them to sit home and watch the elections. With how close elections can be, it really can come down to only a small number of votes needed. Republican legislatures believe that by allowing ex-felons to vote, they would give up the thought of ever having another republican member in the head of government because they feel that felons would register as democrats, which shifts the political views and number of voters during elections. 1 in 10 voting age Floridians could not cast a ballot in the last presidential election (Kander 9) Republican legislatures contribute to the ratio by not allowing ex-felons to vote simply by claiming they will register as democrats. Because they believe this, it throws off the whole political bias and clearly effects the outcome of important government decision. A one in ten ratio really defines how this restoration process affects Americans and their opinions. By shifting the election outcome, it has set back the restoration process even farther. It became so large of a setback that now felons

Open Document