ipl-logo

4fr 119 Case Study

169 Words1 Pages
The Defendant, as the Airport operator directly and vicariously caused foreseeable harm to Plaintiff by, among other things: a) negligently failing to supervise daily operations of the Airport according to the Federal Aviation Regulations and due diligence. b) failing to provide correct information and intentionally concealing and falsifying the information on the company’s website and by doing so failing to warn Plaintiff and others of the risk associated with the violations of the Code of Federal Regulations 4CFR 91 119, while Defendant had a duty to disclose the wrongdoing and potential harm; c) negligently failing to report violations to the Federal Aviation Administration and governmental agencies responsible for public welfare and

More about 4fr 119 Case Study

Open Document