McAleer also found written accounts of flammable well water far before fracking began in 1947. When asked why this information was omitted from GasLand, Josh Fox says it is not relevant. He is, however, mistaken. These facts are not only relevant, but their omission makes Josh Fox an even more unreliable
Paul Galley an accomplished environmentalist enters the controversial debate about Hydrofracking in New York, with his article “Hydrofracking: A bad Bet for the Environment and the Economy” published in the Huffington Post on January 05, 2012. Galley states “Net-Net, fracking is simply bad bet” fracking poses serious risk to New Yorkers. Galley, president of Hudson Riverkeeper has worked for over twenty-five years to protect the environment and support local communities, as a non-profit, public official and educator. This piece continues his devotion to protection of the Hudson River, and the drinking water supply of New Yorkers. Galley effectively convinces his audience through his use of appeals to pathos and logos that hydrofracking will have negative impacts on New Yorkers.
Gasland Summary The documentary Gasland, structured in the form of a travelogue, is written, directed and narrated by John Fox. Fox travels through various parts of the United States in search of instances where water, and waterways, are polluted by “produced water” (industrial term for waste water) of hydraulic fracturing. He had heard of various instances of water contamination and other hazards caused by fracking. He wanted to investigate the likelihood of him facing the same circumstances, because his land was on a proposed fracking site.
The author of the article Greg Ip, believes that despite Obama’s statement, the President knows very well that even though the pipeline will not go into fruition, fossils fuels will still
Jimmy Carter and Environmental Conservation In former President Jimmy Carter's account of his visit to the far north Arctic Refuge in "Arctic National Wildlife Refuge: Seasons of Life and Land," he recalls the unbelievable beauty of the wildlife and nature in the area, calling on conservationists, as well as those whose intentions for the land may permanently damage the wilderness of the region, to consider the effects of construction, industrialization, and oil-drilling in such a rare and environmentally precious area. Carter uses his personal experience in the Arctic Refuge as well as his knowledge of conservationist and environmental affairs as President to establish credibility, along with vivid diction and tone elements to further strengthen his argument against industrial development in an area of the world that should be kept sacred. Carter establishes his knowledge of the Arctic Refuge area almost immediately, recalling his visits to the area with his wife.
The Dakota Access Pipeline is a mile-long from Northwestern North Dakota to Illinois. This pipeline affects drinking water for everyone and invades reservation and treaty land owned by the Native Americans. The Standing Rock Sioux tribe, when informed about the pipeline, declared the tribe objected to the pipe construction. The Standing Rock Sioux begin to fight a “legal battle against the pipeline” and soon a “protest diverge” In “An Indian Protest for Everyone” by David Treuer builds an argument that Native Americans have developed a new type of protest when gathering at Standing Rock.
After months of clashes from protestors and the police, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers issued an eviction notice to the Dakota access protest camps. News articles such as Dakota pipeline protest camp: Ten arrested, dozens more believed to remain after evacuation deadline, by Mark Berman from the Washington Post and Arrest made in North Dakota, as group of pipeline protesters remain at camp, by William Lajeunesse from Fox News, describe the event that happened on the day of the eviction that resulted with their readers concluding with different implications of the event. Lajeunesse and Berman defined key ideas that shaped the view of their readers. They both choose to give and omit specific information that give their readers one side of the eviction.
What The Frack, an anti-fracking video campaign showcasing an array of entertainers, including Lance Bass, Daryl Hannah, Hayden Panettiere, Marissa Tormei and Wilmer Valderrama, recently received a rebuttal from the common man. “Celebrities; You don’t know what the Frack you are talking about” was the Western Alliance’s response. This video features no celebrities, just folks who appear to work in the oil and gas industry touting fracking’s safety record and importance of providing low cost energy to homes all across the U.S specifically at a time when Americans need a break. They point out that fracking has been used for over six decades. The “frack and forth” is the direct result of environmental groups crying wolf about expanding energy technologies in states like Colorado,tSorry Hollywood, this is not a movie, it’s the
From watching this documentary, I believe that there should be another way to make natural gas that does not harm people. I find it awful that companies have found a way around the government to create these policies that permit them to run a business that no one knows what the effects of it are. During the documentary, I neglected to realize that there was a lot of propaganda present in the film and seeing this side made me very interested in seeing FrackNation so that I could make an informed opinion about how I feel about fracking in our
Proposition P================ Propostion P was advanced by an advocacy group known as the Santa Barbara Water Guardians, mainly to prohibit the usage of hydraulic fracturing (i.e fracking) within Santa Barbara, threatening its water supply. As such, Proposition P is absolutely essential, not only to ensuring the health of residents in Santa Barbara, but to ensuring long term social, economic, and environmental stability. Where opponents to Proposition P may tend to make arguments which solely favor the number of jobs in the community, or which perhaps presume the importance of the oil industry in Santa Barbara, over other concerns in the community, these other concerns need to be considered more fully in order to illustrate why support of Proposition P is absolutely essential.================
In the movie Promised Land, two employees from Global Crosspower Solution, Steve and Sue, arrive in an economically struggling Pennsylvania in an attempt to persuade people living in a small farm town to sign off for drilling rights. The ethical dilemma in this movie is fracking. Fracking is the process of drilling and injecting fluid into the ground at a high pressure in order to fracture shale rocks to release the natural gas inside. Fracking is a dilemma. Not only is it highly dangerous, but this is not a safe way to drill these natural gases out without possibly contaminating the groundwater or having these chemicals leak back onto the land.
The Shale gas revolution is an open issue with facts and figures accessible to any interested researcher; hence, this analysis is free from moral and ethical irresponsibilities. Gallagher (2009) defines Research ethics as concerned with the standards of right and conduct, which reflect different paradigms and methodological practices within a particular context (Trussell, 2008). The advantage of using secondary data is, it enables researchers from all walks of life to work together over a period, discipline and geology which an essential part of the culture of collaborative inquiry. The data used was found in the public domain, again no human participation was required and, therefore, no confidentiality code needed to gather data.
Thesis statement The benefits of natural gas hydraulic fracking do not justify the adverse effects it causes through continuous earthquakes, pollution of the water table, or potential health hazards to human populations. This subject is interesting to me because I work for a natural gas company. I have had many conversations with other employees regarding natural gas fracking, and most of them are biased to the views of the drilling companies which means they do not see any harm in it. There also used to be companies fracking for natural gas in Arkansas on the Fayetteville Shell. The number of small earthquakes did rise (3.0 or smaller), but there was nothing resulting in a large amount of devastation.
"Envision going to get your car gasoline for a big day ahead of you, however, you notice that the gas prices increase at your favorite gas station. Distraught, you still fill it up, but ponder over why are the gas prices have increased. This brought you to a realization that we depend too much on nonrenewable sources which can harm our society later on. Dating back to the 1970’s, petroleum has brought a big effect on our society. Stagflation, an economic slow growth of high unemployment and prices, brought Americans to fear for their economic state.
Researchers have “requested data from Pennsylvania, Ohio, West Virginia, and Texas, all states heavily involved in the recent surge of oil and gas drilling, about complaints related to hydraulic fracking for oil and gas” for their research on fracking (Dechert). The research collected was shocking, over 2,000 complaints in Texas alone and several cases on well water contamination within the states mentioned in Decherd’s article. People need to be alerted about how real fracking is and the damages it is doing. These complaints and cases should be a wakeup call to the world and say that we should put it to a
