ipl-logo

A Question Of Ethics 'And Animal Research Saves Lives'

987 Words4 Pages

“A Question of Ethics” by Jane Goodall and “Animal Research Saves Lives” by Heloisa Sabin presents two sides of the same coin in regards to Animal testing. Thereby, questioning the validity or necessity of animal research and testing today. In “A Question of Ethics” by Goodall she presents a scenery of the living conditions of the animals which are often isolated; posing the ultimate questions of, whether animal research is essential to medical research? Or How many tests are performed only to conform to laws and not out of scientific merit? The Suggestion was made that scientists should explore alternative options, such as testing on cell and tissue cultures. On the other hand, Sabin also puts forward an argument in support of animal testing, as her dear late husband Albert Sabin conducted many tests on animals whilst perfecting his vaccine against polio. The sacrifice of these animals has enabled entire generations of humans to grow up without fear of the crippling effects of polio. Animal rights advocates who see animal experimentation as cruel and wasteful overlook the fact that it has been instrumental in developing medicines that have saved countless human …show more content…

In “Animal Research Saves Lives” by Sabin, she purports “…. those who support an “animal rights’ agenda would cripple research and halt medical science in its tracks are slamming the door on the possibilities of new treatment and cures.” In, Goodall’s “A Question of Ethics” argument, she states “I believe that more and more people are becoming aware that to use animals thoughtlessly, without any anguish or making an effort to find another way, diminishes us as human beings.” Clearly, both arguments had a claim for what would be the premise of their essay, setting the stage for their readers to understand the background of the argument and the accepted or understood

Show More
Related
1543 Words | 7 Pages

In his work, Tom Regan establishes the rights of animals used in scientific research. He argues that when animals are used as objects of experiment, they are not respected and their inherent value is not acknowledged. Having inherent value, as defined by Regan, is a state, in which a being is not just a vessel, but a being with a complex mental life. All who have inherent value are to have it equally.

Read More
2744 Words | 11 Pages

Introduction Animals testing have significantly contributed to the advancement of scientific knowledge in general and to biomedical progress specifically. Many example showing that laboratory animals in medical development and other aspects have significantly influenced human health and reduced suffering, for example improved diagnosis of infectious disease (Hau, Jann, Schapiro & Steven, 2002). But since 1960s and 1970s, animals testing protests has gained prominence and strength, people start to argue is it moral to continue “cruel” animal testing. Animal Testing is a Moral Act In the rest of this article, I shall apply different concept under utilitarianism try to discuss whether animal testing are moral acts. It is important to notice that (1) in this article, applying the general idea of utilitarianism which is “the greatest happiness of greatest number” and (2) the animals testing under the rules and regulations.

Read More
1111 Words | 5 Pages

Although the experimentation of animals has furthered medical knowledge, it should not be allowed because it is brutal and animals are unable to give their approval. In order to do a study on humans it must be authorized by them, where animals are unable to give consent, which strikes questions in the world of science on whether this is morally acceptable. Although animal experimentation can result in saving the lives of millions, many find it to be cruel and unjust. Seeing as animals are unable to speak for themselves, they are still able to express their emotions through their behavior.

Read More
966 Words | 4 Pages

all of the sick individuals that it helps because the act of utilizing non-humans in research does the most good for the most people (Lyons, 2001). Protesters are also considered stakeholders due to the fact that they are usually advocating animal sentience and their rights to live naturally, and not in a laboratory setting. Typically, protestors often have an issue concerning this dilemma due to their own ignorance. Unfortunately, this ignorance usually centers on misinformation obtained from the internet, their own imaginations, and the fact that they do not believe that animal research is necessary. Due to their position of ignorance, a protestor cannot present fair scientific data unless they have actually experienced the animal research

Read More
353 Words | 2 Pages

Animal research, a debate for animal rights. Several experts believe the idea valid to debate, while numerous deem the idea absurd. Richard L. Cupp Jr., professor of law at Pepperdine University School of Law, states in his article,¨Animal Cruelty Laws Don't Depend on Animal Rights,¨ that,¨ Rather than focusing on rights for cats and dogs, we should focus on human moral responsibility.¨ People are arguing that we should give animals personhood. ¨Biomedical researchers must study laboratory animals to discover new medicines and therapies, and deem them safe and effective,¨ says Frankie Trull, president of the National Association for Biomedical Research (NABR). She says this, stating that without animal research, there would be no cure for

Read More
1866 Words | 8 Pages

Abstract Animal testing the experiments performed on animals that are used to test the effectiveness and safety of a wide range of things, from medication to cosmetics. They are also used to understand how the human body works. Animal testing is one of the major controversial issues, but animal testing has dramatically contributed to science. First, some people think that animal testing should not be used for testing medical techniques and drugs. However, medical research involving animal testing improved the health of human beings.

Read More
151 Words | 1 Pages

Everyday, non-human animals are being harmed and killed for medical training, biology lessons, and chemical, cosmetics, drug, food testing. It is estimated that 26 million animals are being used yearly for scientific and commercial testing, in the United States alone. The public debate between scientists and animal rights supporters has been happening since the seventeenth century about whether the use of animals in research through experimentation is right. Animal testing, also known as animal experimentation, refers to the process of performing procedures on non-human animals for research purposes, ---Animals have been used innumerable times throughout the history of biomedical research. Utilizing animals to expand our knowledge on numerous

Read More
375 Words | 2 Pages

Animals are used for research in today's society, this research is growing bigger and bigger as the years go by. There is many different view points on animal research both good and bad, There is many different outlooks and view points on animal research that have people wondering if it should be allowed or illegal. Scientists use this for their own benefits and money, while the outsiders are looking in and think it is cruel. In 2011, over 1,000 biochemist scientists were polled, 90% of these agreed that animal research was good to use.

Read More
1084 Words | 5 Pages

Thesis Sentence: The experiments on animals have become a widely discussed ethical issue considering being based on the cruelty towards the animals and the limitations of the practice that need to be overcome but still experiences barriers. Preview of Main Points (these exact words will be used to recap/summarize). Today we will discuss: 1. First, we will speak about the ethical side of the issue of animal experiments which even resulted in the banning of practice in some countries.

Read More
473 Words | 2 Pages

Topic Sentence/Main Claim: Many people think animal testing is bad because it is “unethical”. This is not a very good claim because animal testing helps us with so many things without harming humans. The government is also taking away all of the unnecessary animals in labs. Many people say that we would fund new medicines faster if we use humans for testing. If we did testing on humans we would find cures faster but we would be harming ourselves, when animals do a good job and don’t harm any humans.

Read More
793 Words | 4 Pages

Many argue that animal testing is inhumane, and that animals should no longer be used for the benefit of mankind. However, I can confidently argue that animal testing is, in fact, the best way to prove a product to be safe. In a survey done in the US, 99% of the active physicians thought that animal testing should be continued - for the present, it is clear that no alternative to animal testing is accurate enough to replace it. Without animal testing, we will become the subject of experiments. People should be aware that without any alternative in place, it would be the same as saying that human rights are less important than animal rights.

Read More
967 Words | 4 Pages

Animal testing is a phrase that most people have heard but are perhaps still unsure of exactly what it involve. Whether it is called animal testing, experimentation or research, it should be defined as all testing methods on animals including, medical exploration, cosmetics, toxicology trialing, and psychological examination involving animal subjects. It is used to assess the safety and effectiveness of medications and beauty products as well as understanding how the human physiology works. While supporters believe it is necessary practice, those against animal testing believe that it involves torture and suffering to animals. Medical research is the hardest case of proposition in the debate whether animal testing should be banned or not, since it has previously yielded substantial benefits for humanity.

Read More
1084 Words | 5 Pages

There are both negatives and positives to this argument, although there has been medical discoveries which have saved lives, the lives of the innocent animals being tested on are terminated. Why aren't the lives of animals valued as much as that of a human? Solemnly because they are not able to speak English? No.

Read More
859 Words | 4 Pages

When putting on your lipstick, do you know what brand your lipstick is? If you are not aware, you might indirectly support animal testing without realizing it. Animal testing is a scientific experiment performed on animals to study the effects of drugs, cosmetic products and other chemical products on humans. In other words, it is used to evaluate the effectiveness of new drugs. About 1.4 million animals die each year because of animal testing.

Read More
1130 Words | 5 Pages

In spite of that, some people believe that animal testing is not essential and it should be banned because animals are different from humans physically. In addition, they believe that animal tests are a waste of time and money and there are lower cost alternative methods and more effective. Our purpose of this essay is to prove that animal testing is important and has a lot of benefits and advantages for humanity. Using animals in medical and scientific experiments is necessary, because it finds many cures and treatments, animals bodies are almost similar to the human bodies, also it benefits the animals themselves from diseases.

Read More

More about A Question Of Ethics 'And Animal Research Saves Lives'

Related Topics

Open Document