‘The Tampa Decision: Examining the Australian Government’s prerogative power to detain and expel unlawful non-citizens in 2001’ The executive power of the Commonwealth has largely been neglected, both by the High Court and by commentators, receiving scant attention in comparison with the Commonwealth 's legislative and judicial powers. However, it was just fourteen years ago, in 2001, when a Norwegian cargo vessel MV Tampa being denied entry into Australia after rescuing 438 asylum seekers sparked one of the most controversial yet illuminating civil cases in Australian legal history. The result was a civil suit (Ruddock vs Vadarlis 2001) in which the Federal Government successfully appealed the initial ruling to the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia, where it was found that the government does indeed possess a prerogative power to prevent the entry of non-citizens into
Every well working and strong nation needs a strong foundation. For the United States we use the constitution for our government. Though nations foundations can be unfair and be not for the people(like a dictatorship). Though the U.S constitution guards against tyranny by Using checks and balances to make no branch of government more powerful than another, Federalism, and fair representation. Tyranny is important to analyze because of the effect it can have in any group or organization.
As Benjamin Franklin wrote, the press is able “to strike with the Iron in hot,” allowing news and new ideas to spread throughout the people. In the late 18th century, newspapers used “exchanges,” which was a system in which newspapers from different cities would exchange copies and use stories and news from other papers; therefore, no matter where someone lived, they were able to hear the same news and build a sense of small, yet significant, unity. Newspapers, as well as pamphlets, became more radical throughout this time, straying from their typical stories of European news to recounts of events in the colonies, such as the Boston Massacre or the Boston Tea Party. Along with the ability to report on events throughout the colonies as they occurred, the press could spread ideas and rekindle aggravation by returning to and building upon past issues; therefore, the press was not only creating the fire for the revolution but it was also able “to heat it by continual Striking.” As with Common Sense by Thomas Paine, pamphlets were able to incite a revolutionary fever amongst the common man.
To start, the Freedom of the Press is so important in America that it is the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. In addition the people of the nation at this time were well educated and well read. This free press, educated society combined with the citizens’ desire to become involved within it meant there was more demand than ever for newspapers. These factors meant that the number of different newspapers in the United States increased from 31 in 1775 to 1,200 in 1835, with the number more than tripling between 1810 and 1835 (Document G).
The author’s inclusion of a variety of sources ranging from union publications, newspaper articles and government archives showcases a broad spectrum of both primary and secondary research. The articulation of this research was well written and allowed readers a multi faceted look at how the labour movement was interpreted by those working within factions such as the CIO as well as those working against them. The author missed out on a valuable opportunity in the sense that she makes mention of certain propaganda images, and magazine covers through a descriptive narrative to make a point; a point that would have been a more suitable presentation if the actual images had been included in the text. Overall, the authors use of both primary and secondary sources, coupled with the chronological breakdown of the text and use of subheadings gave readers an easy to follow and interpret look at the arguments made throughout the text. The book is a valuable resource for those looking to expand their knowledge of labour unionism through a Canadian perspective during the Second World
An enduring topic of political debate is executive power, the power to enforce the law. Because the Constitution only loosely defines this power (Document A), the presidents themselves define much of their own authority, which has led to inflated presidential power over the past two and a half centuries. There are many examples of presidents expanding their power in history. For example, Abraham Lincoln broke boundaries no president had before. “Lincoln called for 75,000 military volunteers after Confederates fired on Fort Sumter, and he later suspended habeas corpus—seemingly both congressional powers” (Document E).
“[The press] were not carriers of ideals,” According to Robert G. Parkinson, “but rather tools of propaganda to dupe an unsuspecting public into ratifying policies that lined the pockets of political and economic elites”. (Parkinson). In Parkinson’s opinion, the press used sneaky tactics in order to trick the people into agreeing with their views, which wasn’t always false. There are many examples of press creating depicting images that sway its viewers towards their beliefs, especially when it came to passing certain governmental issues.
On the Arrogance of Power, 1966 Senator J. William Fulbright’s essay, “On the Arrogance of Power, 1966” is a very inspiring and moving piece. It conveys the growing arrogance of America as a Nation and gives reasoning behind such accusation. In addition, Fulbright also gives a solution to such problem and freely contributes his opinion to inform his audience what rewards he predicts. In his essay Fulbright is able to reach his audience through the effective use of the organization and pathos, on the other hand, due to the negligence of ethos his work in turn becomes unsuccessful. Starting with the organization, Fulbright placed the facts in chronological order.
The article, written by Richard Weight, made great agreements to what seemed to be towards nationalism. Though, his main point was that allowances were made for the left-intelligentsia’s role in advancing British culture and achievements for the reason that they were looked at as doing the government’s patriotic work. The British intelligentsia also achieved this through overpowering propaganda, to influence the British people and foreigners, while masking it as a regain of patriotism. Weight suggested in the article that propaganda had changed over periods of time.
Nancy Scheper-Hughes Death Without Weeping, she states that “even the most ‘advanced’ state can resort to threats of violence or to open violence against ‘disorderly’ citizens” (Fassin 2013). This quote suggests that the state uses its discretionary power to maintain the order of society. This discretionary power applies to the police as well. Baldwin’s “A Report from Occupied Territory” provides examples of a state using violence against citizens that society perceives to be disorderly. Baldwin criticizes this use of violence.
Evaluating the Power of Fear in George Orwell’s 1984 Societies that function under the pretense of one caste benefitting from the other's oppression is nothing new. However, it does come with consequences, a major one being class struggles. When applying Marxist criticism, it is unmistakable that George Orwell’s 1984 presents a totalitarian government by maintaining control of citizens and putting them in a frightening state, consequently placing an overwhelming sense of paranoia and fear in citizens' everyday lives. For example, the Inner Party instills fear in citizens by utilizing propaganda, enforcing negative terms and ideas to trigger anxiety, and maintains constant surveillance of its citizens. Therefore, it is evident that Orwell illustrates how the highest class retains their power and
In recent years there has been debate on whether or not the president has too much power. The president 's power has increased over the years, I believe that this increase has given the president way too much power. The amount of power that the president has, can cause total destruction and can manipulate people into doing things that they do not actually believe in. A president should not have some of the powers that he possess, but they are given to him simply because he is the leader of the country. In my opinion the president should be allowed certain powers in order to run the country properly, he is also the leader of the country which grants him the right to have certain powers according to the constitution.
The overarching theme explored within this essay is the tendency of working-class conservatism within society. This has been analyzed above in regards to class-consciousness and hegemony. The popular Marxist explanation of working class Toryism sees a manifestation of false-consciousness on part of a large majority of the working class- a condition which is felt to be redeemable under the right conditions of proletariat education. In addition to this, some scholars have suggested that hegemonic pressures play a role in influencing the class consciousness of certain sects of persons within society. Political allegiances are to a large extent, a reflection of the vales persons within a society subscribe to in areas of their life outside the realm of politics.
understand the 'hidden face' of power as in Steven Lukes' (1974) “three faces of power” it is necessary to explore beyond what initially appears from a policy decision or political standpoint. The realms in which the media operate can be quite complex, gauging an understanding to these is essential when trying to understand the various sources of power that the media controls and hence can manipulate. There have been numerous theories and theorists which have been introduced throughout this course regarding various conceptions of power, the 'two faces' view of Bachrach and Baratz (1970) provided the framework for the view on power. However, it was not until Lukes (1974) “three faces of power” theory which expanded on the work of Bachrach and
Suffrages chose to take a more militant style approach to capture the attention of the government in a way that could not be ignored. They became a public nuisance in terms of publically demonstrating their frustration through actions rather than words. In “Freedom or Death,” Pankhurst speaks on behalf of the suffrage women, “we were called militant, and were quite willing to accept the name. We were determined to press this question of the enfranchisement of women to the point where we were no longer ignored by the politicians” (Pankhurst, 2). Though militant had a negative association, the suffragists prided their actions fighting for an honourable peace.
