ipl-logo

Absolute Authority In Julius Ceaser

776 Words4 Pages

Module A: Comparative study of texts and context Shakespeare’s “Julius Ceaser” explores the concept of absolute authority and how manipulation can cause chaos whereas the Prince by Machiavelli asserts that without absolute authority there is chaos. Understanding of authority has been enhanced by the comparative study of ‘The Prince’ by Niccolo Machiavelli and Shakespeare’s ‘Julius Ceaser’ in the aspect that they are both bold statements to their respective political situation. Understanding of these texts is further enhanced by watching the Charlton Heston rendition of Mark Antony’s speech to the people. Niccolo Machiavelli wrote the prince to serve as a political treatus for an effective leader who is void of morals to achieve his goals, Julius Ceaser is a political play that serves as a statement as …show more content…

The Charlton Heston version of the speech enhances understanding of contextual authority effectively in the presentation of the speech and the way he speaks, Heston puts a large amount of emphasis on the word “Ambition” when he asked the crowd “Was this ambition?” then he praises Brutus for being honourable this is a rhetoric technique that appeals to Ethos, making the audience believe Antony and find credibility in Brutus as he is an honourable man. Logos is used also in Mark Antony’s speech where he makes the audience see the logic behind Brutus being an honourable man and how Ceaser was not as ambitious as they had thought. Pathos is the last of the trio to be used in Mark Antony’s speech, pathos is used when Antony says “you all did love him once” appealing to the audiences feelings and emotions which in turn made them trust Antony and Brutus even

Show More
Related

Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay

850 Words | 4 Pages

In Antony´s speech at Julius Caesar’s funeral, had a hidden, alternate motive. Antony uses rhetoric all throughout his speech, the rhetoric being used are pathos, ethos, and logos. He uses pathos when he is addressing the crowd about how Caesar has compassion for all the people in Rome. Antony also uses logos and ethos to undermine the conspirators. Antony is the speech giver and his target audience are those who admired, and adored Caesar.

Read More

Ethos Pathos And Logos In Julius Caesar's Death

1009 Words | 5 Pages

Brutus and Antony both spoke to the Plebeians at Caesar’s funeral with the intent to persuade the crowd to be in favor of themselves. Since Brutus utilized Ethos and Logos to explain his actions and nothing more, his speech was logical. Correspondingly, he had spoken with the hope that the situation would resolve with the Plebeian’s understanding and his entry into Kingman ship. Meanwhile, Antony made use of Pathos with Logos. Therefore, Antony’s monologue was based emotionally.

Read More

Ethos Pathos And Logos In Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

644 Words | 3 Pages

Throughout Antony’s monologues, he is trying to nonchalantly convince the crowd of people of the conspirators wrong doings to Caesar. Antony uses many methods such as logos and pathos. Using logos, Antony makes the crowd remember exactly how Caesar was towards them and the way Caesar felt about them. Antony uses pathos to appeal to the crowds emotions about how the conspirators killed Caesar. Antony does this to get the crowd away from how Brutus left them, so he does that by using logos and pathos.

Read More

Ethos And Figurative Language In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar

1173 Words | 5 Pages

Following Caesar's death, a funeral is held at which both Brutus and Mark Antony speak. Each attempts to sway the crowd towards their own cause, and both are successful to some degree. However, Antony’s use of rhetorical strategies, figurative language, and tonal shifts allows him to incite enough outrage at the conspirators that Cassius and Brutus are forced to flee the city. The largest component in Antony’s ability to turn the people of Rome against the conspirators is his use of ethos, logos, and pathos.

Read More

Ethos Pathos Logos In Julius Caesar

431 Words | 2 Pages

Julius Caesar: Effective Manipulation Using Rhetorical Fallacies People can be very quick to misjudge a situation when they don’t understand the full story. Mark Antony knows this, effectively manipulating the crowd he gathered at Caesar's funeral. In the play, Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, Antony uses Pathos and Logos to create the more effective speech as a means to turn the people against Caesar’s murderers. Antony uses pathos to convince his audience that Brutus isn’t an honorable man.

Read More

Brutus Use Of Ethos In Julius Caesar

394 Words | 2 Pages

In the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare , Brutus and Antony both have different ways of getting the people’s attention through their speeches. Brutus and Antony appeal to ethos, logos, and pathos. Both use them differently to manipulate the people. Brutus uses them to confuse the people to justify the killing of Caesar. Antony uses them to take advantage of the plebeians and turn them against Brutus.

Read More

How Does Antony Use Ethos In Julius Caesar

482 Words | 2 Pages

Brutus and Antony are the most predominant characters in the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare. In act three Antony and Brutus give a very important speech to the people of rome in which the plebeians get to see their personality. In their speech they both engage one of the three Classical appeals: logos, an appeal to logic; ethos, an appeal to character; pathos which is an appeal to emotion. Although both speeches are similar in structure Antony’s speech is more effective because he wins over the plebeians, gets them to turn on noble Brutus and builds an army.      Antony doesn’t have it great to begin.

Read More

Rhetorical Devices In Julius Caesar

978 Words | 4 Pages

The Tragedy of Julius Caesar- Rhetorical Analysis In the novel, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by Shakespeare, after Brutus brutally executes Caesar in Act 3 Scene 2, Antony is allowed to give a speech to the people of Rome whom have seen witnessed this fatal tragedy in Scene 3. Antony uses anaphora, connotative diction and details throughout his speech to persuade the Romans to change their perspective of Caesar and Brutus. The way Antony speaks about both Caesar & Brutus are a dispute of what he is actually trying to announce to the Romans. At the end of his speech, Antony hopes to reach the Romans emotionally (pathos) by enraging them against Brutus’s false statements against Caesar.

Read More

Ethos Pathos Logos In Julius Caesar

614 Words | 3 Pages

In the tragedy, Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare, two men, Brutus and Antony, use many different techniques to manipulate the minds of the people. Some of these techniques included in their speeches are ethos, logos, and pathos. Both of them appeal to these three rhetorical strategies in their language, but indeed want exceedingly different outcomes. To start off, Brutus applies ethos, the appeal to knowledge, to his speech when he says, “Believe me for mine honor, and have respect to mine honor, that you may believe” (III,ii.

Read More

Ethos Pathos Logos In Julius Caesar

1601 Words | 7 Pages

There are several instances of logos, ethos, and pathos in Shakespeare's play “Julius Caesar”. This improves comprehension of the characters, particularly Antony. Furthermore, in William Shakespeare's play, Antony is always by Caesar's side and is heartbroken when Caesar dies. Because of his emotions, his speech elicits a range of diverse emotions that are intricately related to his logos, ethos, and pathos. As a result of Caesar's death, Antony uses powerful rhetoric throughout his renowned speech to persuade the populace to go to war.

Read More

Ethos Pathos Logos In Julius Caesar

984 Words | 4 Pages

Mark Antony formulates his words in the perfect way that replies to Brutus’s speech prior to his, contradicting every point Brutus attempts to make. The old form of rhetoric, created by Aristotle, consists of Ethos, Pathos, and Logos, each applying to contrasting points that is used to sway the audience. To start off, Ethos is used by Antony when he establishes that “he was [Antony’s] friend, faithful and just to [him]”, making it personal, as well as giving himself inside credibility (Shakespeare, III, ii, 87). Antony also lowers the value of Brutus’s ethos by stating over and over again, using repetition, that Brutus might not be as credible as he made it seem,

Read More

How Does Antony Use Ethos In Julius Caesar

414 Words | 2 Pages

Antony’s speech is bursting with many rhetorical devices to persuade the plebeians that demonstrates his orator skills of using ethos, pathos, and logos. Ethos is prevalent within Antony’s speech when he addresses the credibility of Brutus by saying Brutus is an honorable man. For instance, Antony uses repetition of saying that Brutus is an honorable man that altogether questions his credibility in the following lines: “Yet Brutus says he was ambitious / And Brutus is an honorable man (103-104). By using this clever phase with a tone of sarcasm it degrades Brutus’s orator skills and as a person.

Read More

Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

422 Words | 2 Pages

In William Shakespeare's "The Tragedy of Julius Caesar," two powerful speeches are given by Mark Antony and Marcus Brutus. Both speeches are delivered at Caesar's funeral, and each orator seeks to sway the Roman citizens to their side. Although both Mark Antony and Marcus Brutus deliver powerful speeches, Antony delivers the more effective speech because he appeals to the emotions of the people, provides evidence to support his claims, and undermines the credibility of the conspirators. Mark Antony appeals to the emotions of the people. Antony's use of rhetorical questions and repetition, such as "Brutus is an honorable man," is designed to challenge the credibility of Brutus and the other conspirators.

Read More

Rhetorical Mastery: The Effectiveness Of Antony

656 Words | 3 Pages

In the end, Antony beat Brutus’s speech by a mile. But why is this a problem? Antony used specific literary techniques including ethos, logos, and pathos, as well as, irony, and anecdote to further evolve his speech. Antony uses the ethos in this line to gain the trust of the audience through the fact that Brutus allows Antony to speak today. This builds trust in Antony, and that he is an “honorable man”.

Read More

Compare And Contrast Brutus And Antony's Speech

884 Words | 4 Pages

Brutus delivers his speech in a laudatory manner by conveying Caesar’s deeds and claiming he was ambitious, although Antony contradicts Brutus’ claims and says Caesar spurned the crown with the intent to merely rule as a de facto dictator. Brutus’ speech reveals his motives were truly for the benefit of Rome given his nationalistic tone and Antony’s speech was merely used to obscure his true motives, which was to embroil Rome in a series of civil wars to attain power. Brutus and Antony’s speeches consisted predominantly of Pathos and Ethos, but it is Antony who ultimately it is Antony who prevails because of his almost disingenuous attitude and even use of Logos which is seen when claims that reading Caesar’s will would dishonor his compeers and even Caesar

Read More

More about Absolute Authority In Julius Ceaser

Related Topics

Open Document