Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on restorative justice in school
Restorative justice in schools essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on restorative justice in school
Restorative justice in schools essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Kristin Lewis, the author of "Your Phone Could Ruin Your Life", believes that smartphones do more harm than good. First off, one piece of evidence is that the author writes "58% of pedestrian deaths are kids under 19. Experts believe these tragedies are mainly due to digital distraction. " This means that when crossing streets many people are looking at their phones and not checking the road like they should. Also, another piece of evidence is in the article the author said, "80% of teenagers sleep with their phone nearby.
I am writing to let you know that I am concerned about a student in you 1st period choir class. On 3/7 Ethan Nooner hit Spencer with his back pack. The backpack had pencils positioned in such a way that lead from the pencils wounded Spencer 's right hand. You sent Spencer to the nurse. The nurse removed the pencil lead from Spencer 's hand.
110). According to the author, the aim of restorative justice is to heal communities from an incident where people were harmed and, ideally, help prevent the same thing from happening again. I believe that, there is going to be a higher possibility of crime reduction in schools and in different neighborhood if victims and offenders mediate a restitution agreement to the satisfaction of each other. In conjunction to this, if the government can be more committed in supporting these approaches, I believe that there will be a massive drop in crime
This type of justice system is designed very differently when compared with the retributive justice system. The restorative justice system endeavours to bring the victim and the offender together and allow them to speak with each other in the hopes to support the healing process. It will enable the victims to express themselves to the offender and lets the offender apologize and express their feelings to the victim. The restorative justice system often offers the victims of crime closure. The system encourages both parties to reveal themselves to each other and develop a solution for the future to satisfy both parties involved.
As expressed in our textbook, Restorative Justice Today, one of the most rudimentary aspects of a restorative application is to, “bring harmed people together with those who cause the harm to discuss how they were affected, to take accountability… and to address ways the harm might be repaired” (Wormer & Walker, 2013). Hence, the documentary’s deposition is its inability to identify approaches towards bringing several societal members together such as those perceived to cause the harm (prosecutors, judges, and police officers) with those harmed (the wrongfully convicted, their families, and members of the community). Thus, while institutional errors of this magnitude are understandably difficult to address and are equally difficult to contrive ways to convene, a severe weakness of this film is its inability to obtain perspectives outside of its own such as that of the offending parties. Although understandable as a work seeking to recount the suppressed stories of this marginalized community, through a restorative lens, its debility is its lack of attempts to conduct restorative practices such as attempting to contact offending individuals willing to right these wrongs.
The actions taken by the staff of the school were harmful to the point of
Restorative justice also known as balanced and restorative justice is “a sentencing model that builds on restitution and community participation in an attempt to make the victim whole again (Schmalleger 269).” Restorative justice focuses on “crime as harm and justice as repairing the harm”. This type of justice places crime control primarily in the hands of the community. 3. Indeterminate sentencing encourages rehabilitation using general unspecific sentences.
The impacts and benefits youth restorative justice has on victims are that it allows for the victims to talk to the youth offender and tell their story, ask questions of the offender, and understand the offence committed against them and the offender's story. This allows the victim to have a say about not only the crime but also the outcome and what the young person should do to make up for the harm. From this, the victim can begin to move on from the crime and regain their confidence and sense of safety while they are out and in the community. Not only does restorative justice conferencing impact the victims, but the victims also have an impact on the youth offenders.
The Restorative Justice System focuses on problem solving, liabilities, and obligations. It focuses on the future instead of the past. It would help the boys take responsibility for their actions and be able to restore the crime they committed in the community. The four boys are also first time offenders, which also plays a huge factor because you can see they never intended for what they did to turn out so bad in the end. For the Restorative Justice System you have to be first time offenders so that they are able to help you.
This focuses on non judgemental discussion, developing empathy, and repairing damage that has been done. In the article it states “ After that, we walked down to the cafeteria, where she had tough conversations with the lunch workers and cleaned up the mess she had made. We talked to the teachers who were on lunch duty, so Cindy could understand how difficult and scary it is to intervene in a physical confrontation between high school students.” Although suspending a student can help them catch up on school work (sometimes), the restorative justice system teaches a kid what they have done wrong and take responsibility for their
Today our justice system has a multitude of options when dealing with those who are convicted of offenses. However, many argue that retributive justice is the only real justice there is. This is mainly because its advantage is that it gives criminals the appropriate punishment that they deserve. The goals of this approach are clear and direct. In his book The Little Book of Restorative Justice, Zehr Howard (2002), illustrates that the central focus of retributive justice is offenders getting what they deserve (p. 30).
Restorative Justice processes are likely to reduce criminals from repeating offenses, as numerous recidivism studies have demonstrated. Thus, it would be more than justified to employ restorative processes a response to crimes under
Introduction Restorative justice denotes a program that emphasizes respect, responsibility, and establishing and repairing relationships (Umphrey, 2013). The main focus is on agreement instead of punishment to ensure children stay in school. The program also facilitates the development of a safe environment where learning thrives. On another note, restorative justice brings to fore fundamental changes regarding response to violation of rules or misbehavior in schools. Typically, the response to bad behavior has often been punishment; however, restorative justice focuses on resolving disciplinary problems through cooperative and constructive means (Umphrey, 2013).
Batley (2005) stated that restorative justice is about restoring, healing and re- integrating victims, offenders, as well as the society and also preventing further harm. In this assignment, I will be discussing approaches to restorative justice and illustrating their advantages and disadvantages to offending. I will also provide the applications of these five approaches of restorative justice which are retributive approach, utilitarian deterrence approach, rehabilitation approach, restitution approach and restorative approach in the given case study. I will then explain my preferred approach to justice through identifying a personal belief or value that underpins my choice.
ELIMINATING CORRECTIVE JUSTICE The Supreme Court quoting Weinrib’s concept of corrective justice, dismisses the plea against a number of pharmaceutical manufacturers by Alex .The medical side effects suffered by him due to negligent marketing of the drug CUD could not be attributed to any one pharmaceutical and thus no one could be held liable for the injury. Corrective justice deals with the maintenance and restoration of equality between two parties entering in a transaction. Corrective justice firstly, functions without regard to social rank or moral character; secondly, it regards the transacting parties as equals; and lastly, it focuses on the immediate relationship of doer to sufferer.