She states that “history is written by winners,” with the assumption that there is no God or higher power in this world to create a moral code that all humans should live by. She emphasizes the idea that those who are successful in life and have more power have the opportunity to lay down the law. Because there is no God, all things are lawful and at the discretion of the “winners” in this world. Those who are more successful, regardless of how they came to power, write laws and are the determining factors in what actions are considered moral and what are not. The example of Adolf Hitler shows that it does not matter how he assumed his position, but since he is in the top tier of society, he has the power to implement the governing moral code. This definition of morality given by Aunt May is very subjective and only includes the input of those who are powerful. It limits …show more content…
In society, individuals should create his or her own moral opinions when defining what is lawful. Factors that can influence one’s opinions include the society that one has grown up in as well as social norms. It is important to realize that our society does not need an all powerful figure to dictate what is lawful and what is not. Aunt May’s subjective approach in not needing a supernatural power to state what is right and wrong is partially correct. However, I disagree with her statement that only the most powerful human can form the foundations of morality. Individuals must be sensible enough to take responsibility for his or her actions and create his or her own judgments.
Finally, Professor Louis Levy from the film provides his perspective regarding morality in the world. Levy stresses that actions are deemed immoral or moral as individuals label them using their own sense of character and values. There are