The film Juno, directed by Jason Reitman. Juno was a film that came out in 2007 and tackled many issues, the one that was the clearest among them all was Adoption issue? It explored Jenifer Garner’s character and how she desperately wanted to have Juno’s daughter from the start. This initially sparking from a add that both Garner and Batman put in the paper, asking for the chance to be parents. Juno was apprehensive to do this as she was planning to have an abortion, but with a change of heart she decided to have the baby. Now how would you compare the laws of SA to the laws of adoption? Firstly, in the South Australia the effect of forced adoption has left thousands of people without a proper connection to each relative. In the film they make an effort to enlighten the …show more content…
Thus creating severe trauma obviously as well. There has been attempt by lawyers to take class, but it’s still remains to be a major concern. In the film, everything regarding adoption was dramatized in the sense. Where it tried to make Juno look like she has a lot of options when she was looking for a family to care for her baby. The church also doesn’t condemn abortions either, as well as nothing can happen to the two, before the marriage. Which is something commonly known in SA, but not in the Juno movie. To the point, where they decacted a fully-fledged segment of girl announcing how bad and wrong it is. Thus comparing the two points together. In the end, this topic is so board and is multi coloured that you can’t just paint in black. In SA, it takes up to 2 years to adopt a child and at least the way it was depicted in the film showed it to be instant. The reasoning behind it taking so long in South Australia is because the required workshop for all of the applicants takes about once a year. Which is defiantly not the case in the film, ‘Juno (2007)’. This ends the