ipl-logo

Advantages Of Ratifying The Constitution

389 Words2 Pages

There are always two sides of an argument, in this case for ratifying the constitution there were the Federalist and the Anti-Federalist. Federalist wanted to ratify the constitution because a powerful government would help many individuals under it, “The constitution would find its supporters among the farmers and workingmen of the nation, of course. Urban artisans and small shopkeepers saw the advantages of a government powerful enough to increase commerce and trade. And backcountry subsistence farmers facing hostile Indians and their Spanish allies on state borders saw the virtue in a government strong enough to repel frontier enemies or negotiate favorable international treaties”(pg 173). Furthermore, the only people that opposed it were the wealthy and educated which were the very few in the nation, they even wanted a new constitution but not the one being …show more content…

After these articles and essays, states like New York, Virginia, and New Hampshire were influenced to vote for ratification even though there was a strong number in Anti-Federalist. It was even seen in votes, Delaware anonymous (ratified), Pennsylvania 46-23 (ratified), New Jersey 39-0 (ratified), Georgia 26-0 (ratified) , Connecticut 128-40(ratified), Massachusetts anonymous (ratified), Maryland anonymous (ratified), South Carolina 149-73 (ratified), New Hampshire 57-47 (ratified), Virginia 89-79 (ratified), New York 30-27 (ratified), North Carolina anonymous (not ratified), and Rhode Island anonymous (not ratified). Even though North Carolina and Rhode Island did not ratify , they later joined, North Carolina at November 1789, and Rhode Island at March 1790. Thus, Hamilton being cautiously optimistic made him work to even influence his own state to ratify the constitution, write two-third of the 85 papers, he was able to influence the whole nation to

Show More
Related
1511 Words | 7 Pages

Lectures Lecture 14 “Questions to Consider #1”: Why did the Anti Federalists object so strongly to the Preamble to the Constitution? The Anti-Federalists objected so strongly to Preamble to the Constitution due to the fact the Preamble establishes powers for the three branches of government, states’ relations, mode of amendment, debts, national supremacy, oath of office, and amendment ratification. This group felts as though when the federalists wanting to create a strong central government would not be strong enough if the Preamble was not put into place. Lecture 14 states, “Anti-federalists suspicious of central power fought the new Constitution tenaciously…..

Read More
663 Words | 3 Pages

Each party present during the drafting of the Constitution had their own ideas about what it should accomplish. As a result, it was very difficult to formulate a document that appeased all groups and parties, who often voiced their opinions of how it should be written. The U.S. Constitution was the father of many worries concerning the rights of the people, the role of government, and the balance between the aristocrats and poor, the government and the people. The Federalists, or supporters of the Constitution, were not completely satisfied with the task they were given. They were supposed to revise the old Articles of Confederation, but they felt like it needed to be completely rewritten.

Read More
438 Words | 2 Pages

The Constitution was scribed subsequent to the delegation that occurred at the Constitutional Convention, held in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. This document was intended to be an improvement of the Articles of Confederation, in which the ending result was an entirely new government called the republic. The idea of institutionalizing a constitution created differences between the participants of the meeting. Those who opposed the idea of a new government and the constitution were called the Antifederalists and those who supported the ratification of the Constitution were federalists, which is the idea of federalism vs. state’s rights. The Constitution failed to protect the rights of the civilians despite Federalists attempts to persuade individuals

Read More
827 Words | 4 Pages

Hence Federalists came up with the Bill of Rights as a way to get the Constitution ratified and for people to really see a needed change. The Bill Of Rights which lists specific prohibitions on governmental power, lead the Anti-Federalists to be less fearful of the new Constitution . This guaranteed that the people would still remain to have rights, but the strong central government that the country needed would have to be approved. The 1804 Map of the nation shows that even after the ratification of the United States Constitution there still continued to be “commotion” and dispute in the country.(Document 8) George Washington stated that the people should have a say in the nation and government and everything should not be left to the government to decide.(Document 3) Although George Washington was a Federalist many believed he showed a point of view that seemed to be Anti-Federalists. Many believed that The Bill of Rights needed to be changed and modified and a new document’s time to come into place.

Read More
386 Words | 2 Pages

Before I state my opinion, I must lay out the two opposing sides between the federalists and the anti Federalists. To put it simply, federalists were people who supported the ratification of the constitution. 
On the other side of the spectrum the anti-Federalists were people who opposed the ratification of the constitution. If I was living in the in the 1780’s I probably would have voted and supported the ratification of the constitution. I am the type of person that wants a strong and unified central government.

Read More
99 Words | 1 Pages

The Federalists wanted a strong central government. The Anti- Federalists claims Constitution gives the central government too much power and, and they worried about the new constitution will not give them any rights. That the new system threatened freedom; Also, threatened the sovereignty of the states and personal liberties; failed to protect individual rights. Besides, some of famous peoples such as " Patrick Henry" and artists have came out against the Constitution. Although the anti-Federalists were unsuccessful in stopping the passage of the Constitution, their efforts have been responsible for the creation and implementation of the Bill of

Read More
784 Words | 4 Pages

As reported by many history books, the Constitution required the approval of 9 out of 13 states to win ratification. The Federalists where the group that favored ratification. Mostly the Federalist were wealthy people. Many Americans who were not wealthy supported the Constitution was because they believed that the United States needed a new and stronger national government.

Read More
85 Words | 1 Pages

The Articles of Confederation was the original constitution of the United States, which was ratified in 1781, and replaced by the US Constitution in 1789. The Articles of Confederation was put into place to give the colonies a sense of unified government during the Revolutionary war. There were strengths and weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation. Strengths of the Articles of Confederation consist of declaring war and to make money, to borrow money, detail with foreign countries and sign treaties, as well as operate post-offices.

Read More
203 Words | 1 Pages

When it came to the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists the differences are many and at times very complex, due to the beliefs that the Federalists are nationalist at heart. The Federalists had an incredibly big role in shaping the new Constitution, which the Federalists used to create a stronger Constitution at great cost to the Anti-Federalists. If you ask the Anti-Federalists They believe that should be a ratification of the US Constitution in every state. But due to the Anti-Federalists being poor at organizing they really didn’t gain any ground. Although they didn’t achieve their goals of ratification of the US Constitution, but they did force the first congress under a new Constitution along with the bill of rights.

Read More
360 Words | 2 Pages

The ratification of the constitution first needed to be approve of two thirds of the thirteen state governments before it became accepted as the law of the land. While there certainly were people who were happy with the constitution there are also many who were suspicious of it. Those people who were afraid was because of a strong powerful federal government. To kind of ease people’s fears and to state what it was all about they wrote a series of essays that are known as the Federalist papers.

Read More
642 Words | 3 Pages

Henry was one of the firsts to come out and publicly oppose the Constitution. He argued that the strong national government proposed by the Federalists was a threat to the rights of individuals and that the President would become a king. That taxes would be enforced again, and nothing would change from the separation of the British other then than a new face under a crown. In Rhode Island resistance against the Constitution was so strong that civil war almost broke out on July 4, 1788 on because of the issue of federalism to vs. Anti-Federalism (otherwise known as the battle between the yankees to and the loyalists). At the bitter convention of in Massachusetts, letters essays, debates, and conflict arose to product the devise a solution of 5 and assure that five more states ratifying would ratify the Constitution, and work on solutions They also worked to amend the Bill of Rights.

Read More
885 Words | 4 Pages

They believed that because people are instinctively selfish, that people would have a hard time coexisting in a land where all people were supposed to be treated equal. Though the government was created to aid the people, it was also established to teach the people how to “live properly”. The fact that the constitution was written in the mindset that people needed to be, in a sense, controlled is was and remains a controversial topic. Many view the constitution’s favor for the rich, white, and male property owners was not so much of an “easier way to unify a nation” but more of a list of who it was going to be more desireable to govern. These facts aside, in order to instill equality to a newlywed nation, the people were given some basic human rights and the power to choose who was going to represent them in order to still make sure that the people were still the basis of the new government while still having control over them.

Read More
445 Words | 2 Pages

The Anti- Federalists claimed the Constitution gave the central government an excessive amount of power, and while not a Bill of Rights the folks would be in danger of oppression. Both Hamilton and Madison argued that the Constitution did not want a Bill of Rights, that it might produce a "parchment barrier" that restricted the rights of the folks, as critical protective

Read More
834 Words | 4 Pages

They didn’t expect people to just “accept the merit of the constitution on faith alone.” The federalists knew they had to prove themselves, so they claimed that the constitution was written by ordinary people like the ones criticizing it. They said that there is no plan that is faultless. The articles of confederation were very unstable, so they wanted to make the constitution to where the government was more stable, but it wouldn’t threaten the people’s liberties. They came to a conclusion that to avoid too much power, they would let people be

Read More
494 Words | 2 Pages

They felt the Constitution would create a system of federalism, a system in which the national government holds significant power, but the smaller political subdivisions also hold significant power. They felt the country needed a strong central government so that it didn’t fall apart. The Ant-Federalists were on the opposing side, they felt the Constitution granted the government too much power. They also felt there wasn’t enough protection of their right with an absent Bill of Rights. Another concern of the Anti-Federalists mainly came from the lower classes, from their standpoint they thought the wealthy class would be in main control and gain the most benefits from the ratification of this document.

Read More

More about Advantages Of Ratifying The Constitution

Related Topics

Open Document