ipl-logo

Affirmative Action Case Study

981 Words4 Pages

Affirmative action has been relevant in the United States since the Civil Rights Movement. President John F. Kennedy created Executive Order 10925, which created the Committee on Equal Employment Opportunity, to enforce equal opportunities for blacks or other historically oppressed minorities. Affirmative action programs spread from the work force into the admission process for colleges and universities across the United States. The University of Michigan had two Supreme Court cases challenging their undergraduate and law school admission policy. In Gratz v. Bollinger, an applicant to the undergraduate program, who was denied admission, challenged it because she felt she was denied admission because she did not belong to a minority. In Grutter …show more content…

Affirmative action started during the Civil Rights Movement, when President John F. Kennedy issued Executive Order 10925 that would create the Committee on Equal Employment Opportunity, “comprised of representatives from the major federal agencies and the public, and included a new nondiscrimination clause for all government contracts” (Sewell, 2004, p. 357). This committee would be federally funded for their projects, such as affirmative action, to make sure that all hiring and employment policies were free of discrimination. Eventually, these affirmative action practices were adopted by colleges and universities. While in its beginning, many people saw affirmative action as a form of reverse discrimination, but today it is one of the most debated topics because many people view it as unfair. This is because those jobs or positions may not be going to the most qualified candidate for that job or position, and some feel that they are being penalized just because of their …show more content…

Bollinger, Barbara Grutter challenged the University of Michigan Law School’s admission requirements when she was rejected from the law school. She claimed that she was only rejected because, “the law school used race ‘as a predominant factor, giving minority applicants a significantly greater chance of admission than students with similar credentials form disfavored racial groups’” (Epermanis, Franklin, Robinson, 2007, p. 34). The Federal District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan claimed that Grutter would have been admitted if she would have been black or Hispanic. Epermanis, Franklin, and Robinson (2007) found

Show More
Related

Bakke V. California Davis Medical School Case Study

601 Words | 3 Pages

SUMMARY In this landmark case Allan Bakke, a white applicant to the University of California, Davis Medical School, sued claiming his denial of admission on racial grounds was a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. The standing rule at the time was that race may be a factor in determining admission to educational institutions; however it cannot be the sole determining factor. FACTS OF THE CASE The University of California, Davis Medical School had been reserving 16 spots in each class out of 100 for disadvantaged minorities.

Read More

Abigail Fisher Case Study

927 Words | 4 Pages

In the court case Grutter v. Bollinger, it was ruled that that race had an appropriate but limited role in the admissions policies of public universities. Both Fisher and Michalewicz believed that the school was selecting more people that where of color over equally as eligible whites due to this court case. Fisher decided to bring this

Read More

Jennifer Gratz V. Lee Bollinger Case Study

58 Words | 1 Pages

The case was Jennifer Gratz v Lee Bollinger. Jennifer Gratz, a caucasian women, applied to the University of Michigan College of Literature, Science, and the Arts (LSA) and got denied. The University of Michigan’s admission was based on a 100 point, point system. The University automatically awarded 20 points to students who were a member a minority

Read More

Bollinger V. Gratz Case Study

274 Words | 2 Pages

The second case filed against the University of Michigan is Grutter v. Bollinger (2003). The suit was filed by non-minority applicants who alleged the university for using race as the prevailing factor in admitting students and therefore violated the Equal Protection Clause, Title VI and Section 1981 (Green, 2004, p. 144). In their defense, the University of Michigan argued that the university seeks to ensure their ability to make unique contributions to the character of the student body by enrolling a “meaningful number” of underrepresented minority students (Green, 2004, p. 147). In contrast to the Gratz case, the district court did not follow Justice Powell’s rationale in the Bakke case and the district court ruled in favor of the plaintiff.

Read More

Supreme Court Case: Abigail Fisher V. University Of Texas

776 Words | 4 Pages

The equal protection clause dictates that the Federal government must grant, “the equal protection of the law” to all U.S. citizens. Through this clause, affirmative action was developed, but only under certain circumstances; for a law dealing with discrimination to be upheld, it must be reasonable, must further a state objective, and must be a compelling state objective. In the case Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin, the debate is whether or not promoting educational diversity is a compelling state objective. The use of race in college admissions is found to be unconstitutional.

Read More

Grutter V Bollinger Case Study

151 Words | 1 Pages

Joshua Sisk AP Government Dr. Smith 5/13/2017 Citation- Grutter v Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 Facts- When a white woman, Barbara Grutter a resident of Michigan, applied for the University of Michigan law school, she was denied based on so called “soft variables”, such as race. Grutter sued the University of Michigan for racial discrimination. President of the university, Lee Bollinger, was elected the defendant of the case.

Read More

Barbara Grutter Case Summary

403 Words | 2 Pages

Procedural history. Barbara Grutter (Plaintiff), a white resident from the state of Michigan, was denied admission to the University of Michigan Law School (Defendant). She sued the Law School in a federal district court, and alleged racial discrimination against her in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment on the basis of the Defendant’s consideration of race as a key factor in the school’s admissions process. The district court upheld the Plaintiff’s claim. The court of appeals reversed.

Read More

A Brief Case Of Regents Of The University Of California V. Bakke

960 Words | 4 Pages

In the case of Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, Allan Bakke a white male was rejected from regular admissions into California University. He was rejected twice; meanwhile, minority students with lower grade point averages were being admitted into the same school under a special admissions program. After his second rejection, Allan Bakke was very upset, so he filed a law suit to the Superior Court of Yolo County, California. He wanted the chance to be admitted into medical school through the special admissions program. The University said that their admissions program was important and it ought to be kept in the University.

Read More

California Vs Bakke

1496 Words | 6 Pages

The Supreme Court case of The Regents of the University of California versus Bakke questioned the use of affirmative action in applications. The medical school of the University of California at Davis reserved sixteen out of one hundred seats of every entering class for minorities (Blacks, Chicanos, Asians, and American Indians) (Banfield pg.82). Allan Bakke a white male in his mid-thirties was twice denied access to the University strictly based on quotas, although Bakke had MCAT scores and GPA higher than other minority applicants admitted (McBride par.3). Bakke would later sue The University of California on the basis that the school had violated the civil rights act of 1964.

Read More

Grutter V. Bollinger Essay

1526 Words | 7 Pages

Grutter V. Bollinger Research Paper 2 Abstract Barbara Grutter (plaintiff) which is a resident of Michigan who was denied admissions into the University of Michigan Law School. Lee Bollinger (defendant) was president of the University of Michigan. Grutter filed this suit because the University had discriminated against the basis of race. Supreme Court ruled that the use of affirmative action in school admissions is constitutional if it treats race as some factor.

Read More

Affirmative Action: The Case Of Gratz V. Bollinger

379 Words | 2 Pages

Affirmative action is the policy of giving special consideration to minorities and women. People should be chosen based on their abilities and not race, or gender. In the case of Gratz v. Bollinger (2003), the Supreme Court ruled that it is unconstitutional if affirmative action automatically increases an applicant 's chances over others just because of their race or gender. The University of Michigan used a 150-point scale to rank applicants, with 100 points needed to guarantee admission. The University gave minorities an automatic 20-point bonus towards their score.

Read More

Affirmative Action Hurts White People

845 Words | 4 Pages

Gratz and Hull are not alone on the defense side of affirmative action. In his article “University Affirmative Action Admissions Policies Are Toxic,” Robert Cherry asserts that “affirmative action admissions policies disportionately accept students with lower-than-average test score and grades. As a result, they are not adequately prepared for the rigors of top-tier universities.” In making this comment, Cherry clearly favors for affirmative action to be taken out of higher education. He supports his argument with data that suggest that minorities are not performing as well as whites because some colleges lower their standards in order to accept more minorities.

Read More

Affirmative Action: Reverse Discrimination

1480 Words | 6 Pages

RESEARCH PAPER Affirmative action is a set of governmental policies which tend to give privileges to minorities who suffered from discrimination in the past by providing them with access to educational and employment opportunities. First nuanced by Franklin Roosevelt with war-related work, Affirmative action only became an executive order (10925) in 1961 under John F. Kennedy to ensure that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, creed, color or national origin, to which was later on added sex by Lyndon Johnson in 1965 (11246). From that day till now affirmative action has been a controversial issue in America, with some who find it fair and some other who consider it as a reverse discrimination.

Read More

Argumentative Essay On Race-Conscious Admissions

1013 Words | 5 Pages

The main precedent that has stuck with the court from Bakke to now Fisher is that a diverse student body is a compelling enough interest for a university to pursue. This goal is to be carried out in a narrowly tailored manner which the court has accepted as a race-conscious admissions program. The program is deemed constitutional on the basis that it only uses race as a plus factor in the admissions process. These programs, however, run in stark contrast to the provisions set forth in the Equal Protection Clause; in which the state is not allowed to treat individuals differently based on the category of race. The race-conscious admissions program albeit better than a pure quota system still uses race as a crucial factor.

Read More

Serial Killers Vs Serial Killers

1479 Words | 6 Pages

Differentiating between spree killers and serial killers in an ongoing debate between criminologists (Montaldo 2019). Criminologists focus a lot on the psychological issues of spree and serial killers when studying. Serial killers differ from spree killers in many ways, this can include their motivations for killing and their behavior at the crime scenes (Morton 2023). When researching, you should look into past spree and serial murders, like Ted Bundy and Jeffrey Dahmer who were serial killers and Charles Starkweather and William Cook who were spree killers. Serial killers are when somebody kills three or more victims but each victim is killed on separate occasions (Montaldo 2019).

Read More

More about Affirmative Action Case Study

Related Topics

Open Document