Agriculture Populism And The Rise Of Fusion Summary
Edwards voices the drastic growth in production and new inventions in the North, but points out the South’s struggle with keeping up with the drastic growth. It is clear Edwards wanted reader to fully understand that the South was struggling greatly after the war and because of it the North led the Industrial Revolution. Edwards focuses around the following question: What does the South do to reestablish itself and become economically stable again after facing an overwhelming loss agriculturally? Edwards use of evidence to back up her argument of the South’s struggles after the war and the lack of reconstruction make it a reliable statement. Her evidence includes groups such as Ku Klux Klan and the Republican corruption to be main evidence to why the South was behind the rest of the nation.
Throughout the Civil War, as well as the 1860’s as a whole, it was evident that United States was sparsely growing, in industrial goods, the production of agriculture, and the spread of settlements. At this time, the United State’s population was more than double than its previous period. At this time the United states population was Approximately 31,443,321 million citizens (Joseph C. G. Kennedy, The Eight Census; 1864). In this time period we see most of the United State’s economical growth coming from the Midwest as well as the Northeast. As for the South, they remained rather agricultural, due to the desire of one of the biggest crops to ever support the United States, Cotton.
Virginia During the Reconstruction Era The Reconstruction Era, spanning from 1865 to 1877, stands as a pivotal chapter in American history following the Civil War. It was a period marked by ambitious efforts to rebuild the war-torn nation, reintegrate the Southern states into the Union, and confront the enduring effects of slavery. During this time, federal and state economic policies played a crucial role in shaping the trajectory of Virginia's economic recovery and societal transformation. This essay aims to delve into the intricate effects of these policies on Virginia, revealing a complex combination of factors including attempts to rejuvenate the economy, shifts in political power, and the persistent challenges of racial inequality.
Although, the North is often portrayed as the “good guys” when it comes to the fall of Reconstruction but in actuality they were equally as guilty as the south was. According to Document C In the 1870s, the people of the north were beginning to grow indifferent to the events happening in the south because their focus shifted to the scandals going on around them, such as the Panic of 1873.The government at this time in the North was ran by “carpetbaggers” or a political candidate who sought election in an area they had no local connections to. The North began to grow tired of this type of government and they also began to become tired of fighting against discrimination in the south because of this. Increased anger about government corruption lead to less interest in Reconstruction. Racism still existed in the North and contributed to the fall as well, for example many people believed that people of color were unfit to be government officials.
Contrary to the South, the North came to rely increasingly on trade than threshing due to their rocky soil and potation climate. Industry and Commerce became the focus of the North as many factories sprung up all over the North. The North had the wholesomeness in each of the categories that were based on population, number of soldiers, number of factories, and miles of railroad tracks (Doc. B). While the North was worldly-wise to provide them with a steady economy based on mass-production, factory work, and sophisticated ways to help transport manufactured goods, the South's economy was based on threshing and an wide-stretching transmission labor force. They needed a never-ending supply of workers who were cheap, so African Americans were their first choice.
The South became a crop-based society that depended on the cheap labor of slaves. The North became a manufacturing and trading society that had saw slaves as helpful, but not absolutely crucial. Further into the future, this difference would drastically affect the Americas, through racial tension and ethical dilemmas. It would become a huge part of the civil war’s cause, a war that irrefutably shaped today’s world. All of these implications arose simply from the fact that the Northern colonies adapted to their environment in a way that did not require workers whereas the South adapted differently, demanding slave
Southerners who couldn’t vow that they never betrayed the union were not allowed to vote and therefore were stripped of their political power. The North for once also had the population majority due to all the immigration happening. The bulk of the political choices therefore would be made with a republican bias. Wit this they won office coming into the twentieth century and destroyed the populist
The mixture of military controlled southern governments that allowed African Americans to vote, and loyal unionists in the North,
The great Civil War that engulfed the United States in 1861 resulted from a fundamental cleavage between its two most powerful sections, North and South. (Reid: 88) Prior to the American Civil War there were significant differences between the Northern and the Southern States in terms of social, economic and political preferences. The Industrial Revolution transported from Great Britain to the Northern States fueled this dichotomy. The society in the North was industrializing and urbanizing, creating a suitable environment for entrepreneurship and improved job opportunities. In addition, the enormous expansion of the railroad network, new means of communication and the politics of economic liberalization contributed to the formation of
The Civil War Era was a period of great division for the United States of America. Growing Sectionalism between the North and South about politics, economics and ethics culminated in one of the most devastating wars in American history. During the time period from the early 1860s till Restoration, while the changes to the country’s legislature illustrated the growing power of the Republican Party’s ideals on government and democracy, the opinion of the southern white population remained the static; however, marginally new wide-spread ideals about freedom in politics drastically changed the country’s legal standards of democracy. Consequently, these laws created groups of citizens that were adamant about maintaining the pre-war status quo of
The North was producing about $1.5 billion in manufactured goods in 1861 compared to the South’s mere $155 million (Document 2). With the North producing about ten times more in value, the South became inferior and struggled for power. Also, all of the products in the North was made without any slaves at all, while the South relied on 3.5 million slaves to produce about five million bales of cotton that year. (Document 2). When the North threatened to take away slavery and the South’s livelihood, the South started to become agitated.
From segregation and voting laws to sharecropping, reconstruction did not turn out to be the success it had the potential to be. Many years later, we are
Despite these efforts, the white Southerners resisted strongly by trying to control the black population in the South. They were able to maintain economic dominance on the freed slaves by the sharecropping system. As times went by, Northerners become exhausted from the Southern resistance and they had their own growing concerns such as economic Panic of 1873; they had increasingly become disinterested in the freed black populations in the South. The South was also able to regain political control back in the region through violence and intimidation. As a result, they were able to regain some political power in the congress.
The South was able to produce 7/8 of the worlds cotton supply. The South became more dependent on the planted field system and it’s full of force part, slavery. Notably, at that moment, the North was flourishing industrially. The North depended on factories and others
With air-conditioning, skyscrapers, interstates, rural improvement to shopping malls, the new South was no more plainly separated from the rest of the country. The political, economic and social change in the South brought historical movements, belief systems and patterns into the Modern South. I will be concentrating on Modern South 's political parties, social identities, culture wars, environmental conditions and change in economic aspects in the middle of WWII and today. By the most recent years of the twentieth century, the Republican Party had turned into a noteworthy power in the South.
More about Agriculture Populism And The Rise Of Fusion Summary
Summary Of New Spirits By Rebecca Edwards
1168 Words | 5 PagesPacific Railroad Dbq
1103 Words | 5 PagesFederal And State Economic Policies In Virginia During The Reconstruction Era
2899 Words | 12 PagesHow Did The South Contribute To The Failure Of Reconstruction
236 Words | 1 PagesCivil War Dbq Essay
1116 Words | 5 PagesHow Did The Environment Affect The Development Of The Northern And Southern Colonies
738 Words | 3 PagesWhy Did The North Won The Civil War Essay
611 Words | 3 PagesReconstruction Dbq Essay
1367 Words | 6 PagesCivil War Dbq
1067 Words | 5 PagesCivil War Dbq Essay
1088 Words | 5 PagesCivil War Dbq Essay
734 Words | 3 PagesReconstruction Dbq
491 Words | 2 PagesWas Reconstruction A Success Or Failure Essay
688 Words | 3 PagesCivil War Economic Causes
837 Words | 4 PagesThe Modern South In The Twentieth Century
990 Words | 4 Pages