ipl-logo

Albert Beveridge Annexation Of The Philippines Summary

790 Words4 Pages

The following publication of Albert J. Beveridge’s powerful speech, strongly advocates the annexation of the Philippines, which took a virtually major relationship between religion, race, and profit for imperial expansion. The most striking point about Albert J. Beveridge text, however is his five poorly thought out reasons justifiying Americas to colonize the Phillippines, which were religion, trade, keeping up with other countries, resources, and “barbarous” natives.

Albert J. Beveridge, a first-term Republican senator from Indiana, was one of the most ardent advocates of imperialism. Noted for his speaking abilities and fervent nationalism, Beveridge traveled to the Philippines in order to gather information. In Albert J. Beveridge’s 1900 …show more content…

Especially with the Philippines being the closest trading port for the US. But nothing is so natural as trade with one's neighbors. The Philippines make us the nearest neighbors of the East. Nothing is more natural than to trade with those you know. This is the philosophy of all advertising. The Philippines bring us permanently face to face with the most sought-for customers of the world. National prestige, national propinquity, these and commercial activity are the elements of commercial success. The Philippines give the first; the characters of the American people supply the last. It is a providential conjunction of all the elements of trade, of duty, and of power. If we are willing to go to war rather than let England have a few feet of frozen Alaska, which affords no market and commands none, what should we not do rather than let England, Germany, Russia, or Japan have all the Philippines? And no man on the spot can fail to see that this would be their fate if we retired. Now with the profit of trading supplies, the wood of the Philippines can supply the furniture of the world for a century to come and the wood, hemp, copra, and other products of the Philippines supply what the U.S needs and cannot

Show More
Related
588 Words | 3 Pages

“We hold with Abraham Lincoln, that ‘no man is good enough to govern another man without that other’s consent’... ‘that is despotism (rule by a tyrant),”(document A). Even though he was not alive, Abraham Lincoln posed a great point as to why the Philippines should not be annexed; they did not give their consent. The Philippines was taken over and annexed against their will by the US. Document A also says that annexing the Philippines extinguishes “the spirit of 1776 in those islands”.

Read More
616 Words | 3 Pages

Both Nell Irvin Painter and Kristin L. Hoganson have two different prospective on the annexation of the Philippines. Painter’s approach of explaining the annexation was more of an economic view rather then Hoganson’s, which was a more sexiest view. An example of Painter’s view is when he said,” the culprit, it seemed, was agricultural and industrial overproduction” (Painter). He is saying the America simply produced too much, and they did not care. Business thought taking over The Philippines would help American gain access to trading with China.

Read More
447 Words | 2 Pages

Many Americans thought occupying foreign countries, like the Philippines after the Spanish American War, was a bad idea because it contradicts the American values of equality found in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. (Doc D) However, a majority of America sided with people like Senator Albert J. Beveridge who believed people were chosen by God to expand into China and the Philippines to open more Asian markets. (Doc E) This was a continuation of past expansionism because acquiring land for money Manifest Destiny have been motives for expansionism for

Read More
667 Words | 3 Pages

The immediate positive effects of the imperialism in

Read More
749 Words | 3 Pages

In 1899, the United States annexed the Philippines after a short but bloody war with Spain. These rich, plentiful islands full of resources were in great demand. The U.S. saw the Philippines; fighting against Spain so like them when they were rebelling, and decided to step in and aid ‘the spirit of 1776’ (Doc. A). However, the question still remains: should the United States have annexed the Philippines?

Read More
1532 Words | 7 Pages

He believes that only the strenuous life can play great role in the prosperity and welfare of the individuals and nation as well. Practically, Roosevelt was an ardent supporter of imperialism and wanted America to play integral role in world affairs and politics. This speech also depicts his policy of interventionism and imperialism. Roosevelt defends American imperialism by taking America’s national interests into consideration. However, his imperialist approach in foreign policies raises many questions for the audience sitting outside the borders of America.

Read More
816 Words | 4 Pages

What were Beveridge's economic motives for imperialism? Beveridge’s economic motives for imperialism derived from industrialization and the current economic growth America was already witnessing. This was the period where industrialization was growing at a rapid pace not only in the United States but worldwide. He made the case that the opposition was correct in resisting imperialism in the past because there was no need for new land back then.

Read More
738 Words | 3 Pages

Imperialism was a controversial idea that a nation can extend its power outward through means of diplomatic or military force. This often results in a shift of power from one major force currently in control to another. The people of that nation under control conflict may also experience wars, rebellions, or cultural destruction. Looking at some of these events, we see some positives and negatives of imperialistic action taken by the United States, and how it affected the nations imperialized by the United States. For starters, let’s look at Hawaii’s annexation.

Read More
374 Words | 2 Pages

William McKinley in his thoughts on American Expansionism has identified the reasons why America had no other choice but to incorporate Philippines as a part of it. This writing has been lifted from the excerpts of an interview with William McKinley soon after Spain had surrendered in the Spanish-American war. McKinley cleverly talks in this interview about how Philippines just came and fell into the laps of America thereby suggesting the helpless stance of America. He talks about how America’s sole intention and purpose had only been to safeguard its own interests as a country. He had to order that the Spanish fleets in Manila be destroyed because if left unattended, they would have crossed the Pacific and wreaked havoc in the American states

Read More
329 Words | 2 Pages

Gail Bederman from the university of Notre Dame claims that Theodore Roosevelt, who was the greatest supporter of the attack on Spain and Philippines, had it engineered by both race and gender. These two concepts made him perceive imperialism as being the next stage of growth in a healthy republic. To him, expansion and domination were necessary if America was to civilize the world. For people like Theodore Roosevelt, as the United States advanced, the democratic vision was also progressing (Bederman, 1996). Theodore Roosevelt, just elected to office in 1882, felt that he was very important and had many ambitions.

Read More
437 Words | 2 Pages

The Philippines had been fighting for their freedom against the Spanish for many years. Naturally, when America defeated the Spaniards in the war, the Filipinos rejoiced at the thought that they may be able to finally return safely and peacefully back to their home, Manila. Where this information comes from in the text, would be: “These Filipinos believed that

Read More
518 Words | 3 Pages

The annexation of Texas occurred in the early 1800’s. American colonists were expanding into the Northern sector of the Rio Grande, which developed the need for Texas to become a part of the United States. In the South, the people supported the drive toward the annexation of Texas, but the Northerners opposed this idea. Texas was another slave state and the nature of their society did not appear appealing to the North.

Read More
468 Words | 2 Pages

Hawaii, Puerto Rico, Cuba, Panama are all on the list of island the U.S are interested in From the evidence shown above this shows that imperialism is not the best option. Although it could lead to the spreading of U.S commerce it does not follow our constitution, it could lead to tyrant like behavior, and could lead to conflicts with other countries that might also be imperialist

Read More
332 Words | 2 Pages

Zinn is keen on the abroad dominion that got to be vital in the US in the 1890s. Zinn contends that the colonialism was brought on to a limited extent by a craving for Americans to have the capacity to be masculine and brave. This yearning is most broadly associated with Theodore Roosevelt. Be that as it may, there were different explanations behind the colonialism. For instance, colonialism was additionally determined by the yearning for abroad markets in which to offer oil and homestead items.

Read More
1691 Words | 7 Pages

In 1512, a watershed moment in history occurred: the Portuguese became the first European power to come across the Indonesian Archipelago. What had been found could not be unfound; European contact with the East Indies and mainland Southeast Asia would be a defining force in shaping the region for the last half of the millennium. In the next century, the British East India Company (EIC) and Dutch East India Company (VOC) were established to facilitate trade between Europe and Asia. Around the same time as the "discovery" of modern-day Indonesia, Ferdinand Magellan arrived in the Philippines and declared it a colony on the behalf of the Spanish Crown. Prior to European arrival, the people of Southeast Asia were no stranger to sea trade.

Read More

More about Albert Beveridge Annexation Of The Philippines Summary

Related Topics

Open Document